From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Dasht-i-Leili massacre
2001 massacre in Afghanistan
2001 massacre in Afghanistan
| Field | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| title | Dasht-i-Leili massacre | |
| partof | the War in Afghanistan (2001–2021) | |
| image | File:Mass grave from the Dasht-e-Leili massacre.jpg | |
| image_size | 275px | |
| caption | A mass grave containing Taliban prisoners in the Leili Desert, as discovered during a joint investigation by Physicians for Human Rights and the United Nations in 2002 | |
| map | {{Location map many | Afghanistan |
| width | 275px | |
| float | center | |
| marksize | 8 | |
| coordinates | ||
| position | right | |
| label | Sheberghan Prison | |
| location | Near Sheberghan Prison, Jowzjan Province, Afghanistan | |
| target | Taliban | |
| coordinates | ||
| date | December 2001 | |
| type | Massacre | |
| fatalities | 250–2,000 | |
| victims | Prisoners of war | |
| perpetrator | Flag of Afghanistan (1992–2001).svg National Islamic Movement | |
| accused | Abdul Rashid Dostum (denied by Dostum in 2009) |
In December 2001, between 250 and 2,000 Taliban insurgents who had surrendered to the National Islamic Movement of Afghanistan (part of the Northern Alliance) were massacred while being transported to Sheberghan Prison in the Jowzjan Province. Fighters loyal to General Abdul Rashid Dostum tightly packed the prisoners into shipping containers in Kunduz and sealed them inside, while denying them water and sustenance, and reportedly shot all those who had not died of suffocation by the time the convoy arrived at Sheberghan. The prisoners' corpses were subsequently buried in mass graves throughout the Leili Desert.
Controversy emerged following allegations of American involvement, particularly after the 2002 documentary Afghan Massacre: The Convoy of Death was published by Scottish journalist Jamie Doran and screened for the European Parliament. That same year, teams were dispatched by Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) and the United Nations to conduct forensic investigations in the Leili Desert, where mass graves containing recently deceased bodies were discovered, with their autopsy reports revealing causes of death that were consistent with the means of homicide that had been described by eyewitness testimonies.
In 2008, PHR reported that the mass graves had been tampered with since the initial investigation. The massacre was not widely covered in American mass media until July 2009, when Dostum denied that his troops had perpetrated the massacre shortly after the Obama administration publicly "ordered national security officials to look into allegations that the Bush administration resisted efforts to investigate a CIA-backed Afghan warlord over the killings of hundreds of Taliban prisoners in 2001."
Events
Siege of Kunduz and Taliban surrender
In late 2001, around 8,000 Taliban fighters, including Chechens, Uzbeks and Arabs, as well as suspected members of al-Qaeda, surrendered to the Junbish-i Milli faction of Northern Alliance General Abdul Rashid Dostum, a U.S. ally in the war in Afghanistan, after the siege of Kunduz. Several hundred of the prisoners, among them American John Walker Lindh, came to be held in Qala-i-Jangi, a fort near Mazar-i-Sharif, where they staged a bloody uprising which took several days to quell. The remaining 7,500 were loaded onto containers for transport to Sheberghan Prison, a journey that in some cases took several days. Human rights advocates say hundreds or thousands of them went missing.
Prisoner transports and massacres
In late 2001, Carlotta Gall, Jamie Doran and Newsweek began reporting rumors that Dostum's forces, who were fighting the Taliban alongside the US Special Forces, intentionally suffocated as many as 2,000 Taliban prisoners in container trucks in an incident that has become known as the Dasht-i-Leili massacre.
The first allegations that dozens of prisoners had suffocated in the containers appeared in a December 2001 article in The New York Times. A 2002 documentary named Afghan Massacre: The Convoy of Death by Jamie Doran produced testimony from eyewitnesses alleging hundreds or even thousands of prisoners had died, either during transport in the containers or being shot and dumped in the Dasht-i-Leili desert after arriving at the hopelessly overcrowded Sheberghan prison. Witnesses presented in the documentary also alleged that wounded and unconscious survivors of the container transports had been executed in the desert in the presence of U.S. soldiers. Doran's documentary, which was viewed by the European and German parliaments, caused widespread concern in Europe and among human rights advocates. It was not reported on in the United States mass media.
Allegations of American involvement
Allegations of American involvement were disputed by Robert Young Pelton, who had been in the area reporting for National Geographic and CNN. Pelton also said the number of prisoners who suffocated in the containers was roughly 250, a far smaller number than alleged in Doran's documentary. He claims he saw US medics treating some of the prisoners. He says some of the bodies may be victims of the Taliban or of Malik's executions in the 1990s.
In 2016, Dostum spoke to Ronan Farrow, reluctantly admitting that local commanders had loaded prisoners from the uprising at Qala-i-Jangi into multiple containers and that American forces had been present. Dostum denied that either he or the Americans murdered the prisoners and would not directly say whether he had ordered the commanders to do this nor whether witnesses were later killed.
Investigations
PHR and UN discovery of mass graves
In 2002, Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) led an investigation of alleged mass gravesites at Mazar. A UN forensic team found fifteen recently deceased bodies in a six-yard trial trench dug at a 1 acre grave site and performed an autopsy on three of them, concluding that they had been the victims of homicide, the cause of death being consistent with suffocation, as described by the eyewitness reports featured in Doran's film. A major Newsweek article on the massacre appeared in August 2002, raising questions about America's responsibility for the war crimes committed by its allies. It quoted Aziz ur Rahman Razekh, director of the Afghan Organization of Human Rights, asserting "with confidence" that "more than a thousand people died in the containers."
The 2002 Newsweek article stated that "death by container" – locking prisoners in containers and leaving them to die in them – had been an established method of mass execution in Afghanistan for some years. As the containers were sealed, the prisoners began suffering from lack of air soon after being locked in them. According to witnesses in Doran's documentary, air holes were shot into the sides of some containers, killing several of those inside. Newsweek reported that drivers were punished for giving water to the prisoners, or punching holes into the containers. Survivors of the container transports, interviewed by Newsweek, recalled that after 24 hours the bound prisoners were so thirsty that they resorted to licking the sweat of each other's bodies. Some bit into the bodies of fellow prisoners. In the containers of these survivors, only 20 to 40 prisoners of an original 150 or more were still alive when the containers arrived at their destination.
Role of the Bush administration
Further investigation of the mass grave sites were impeded by Rashid Dostum's continuing military control over the area and due to intimidation. Physicians for Human Rights have claimed that the Bush administration consistently refused to respond to PHR's calls for investigation.
Ahmed Rashid wrote in 2008 that the prisoners were "stuffed in like sardines, 250 or more per container, so that the prisoners' knees were against their chests". According to Rashid, only a handful survived in each of the thirty containers and UN officials reported that just six out of an original 220 survived in one of the containers. The dead were buried by bulldozers in pits in the desert. Rashid called the massacre "the most outrageous and brutal human rights violation of the entire war", which had occurred "despite the presence of US SOF in the region."
Probe by the Obama administration
In 2008, the United States Defense Department and State Department released documentation per a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by Raymond that indicated that 1,500 to 2,000 people were killed at Dasht-i-Leili.
On 10 July 2009, an article on the massacre by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist James Risen appeared in The New York Times. Risen stated that human rights groups' estimates of the total number of victims "ranged from several hundred to several thousand" and that U.S. officials had "repeatedly discouraged efforts to investigate the episode". Questioned about the article by Anderson Cooper of CNN during a trip to Africa, United States President Barack Obama was reported to have "ordered national security officials to look into allegations that the Bush administration resisted efforts to investigate a CIA-backed Afghan warlord over the killings of hundreds of Taliban prisoners in 2001."
Excerpts from Doran's documentary Afghan Massacre: The Convoy of Death were broadcast on Democracy Now! on 13 July 2009, with images from the documentary shown on the programme's website. The programme, which featured James Risen and Susannah Sirkin, deputy director of Physicians for Human Rights, claimed that "at least 2,000" prisoners of war had perished in the massacre. Sirkin confirmed the claims made in Afghan Massacre: The Convoy of Death that eyewitnesses who had come forward with information on the incident had been tortured and killed, and stated that a FOIA document showed that the "U.S. government and, apparently, intelligence agency – it's a three-letter word that’s redacted of an intelligence branch of the U.S. government in the FOIA – they knew and reported that eyewitnesses to this massacre had been killed and tortured."
Risen commented in the programme that in writing his article he "tried not to get caught up in something that I think in the past has slowed down some of the efforts by journalists to look into this. I think in the past one of the mistakes some journalists made was to try and prove a direct involvement by the U.S. personnel in the massacre itself. I frankly don't believe that any U.S. military personnel were involved in the massacre. And, you know, U.S. Special Forces troops who were traveling with Dostum have long maintained that they knew nothing about this. And, you know, so I tried not to go down that road." He added that "the investigation should focus rather on what happened afterwards in the Bush administration."
A New York Times editorial on 14 July 2009 called the Bush administration's refusal to investigate a "sordid legacy". Noting that Dostum was "on the C.I.A. payroll and his militia worked closely with United States Special Forces in the early days of the war", the editorial asked President Obama to "order a full investigation into the massacre. The site must be guarded and witnesses protected." Edward S. Herman, writing in Z Magazine, commented that this renewed interest by The New York Times in the massacre, after a 7-year silence on the matter, was rather late in coming and coincided with Dostum's restoration to a position of power in Afghanistan prior to the August 2009 elections, in a move that the U.S. administration disapproved of. Herman said that The New York Times had essentially looked whichever way the current U.S. administration had wanted it to look for the best part of a decade, and that this was also "part of the sordid legacy of the New York Times."
On 17 July 2009, in an article published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Dostum, recently reappointed to his government job by Afghan President Hamid Karzai, again described Doran's film as a "fake story", saying that the whole number of prisoners of war captured by his troops was less than the number Doran's film claimed had been killed, and denying there could have been any abuse of prisoners. Dostum's column was sharply criticised by human rights groups. In a rebuttal published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty in parallel to Dostum's piece, Sam Zarifi, the Asia-Pacific director for Amnesty International and a human rights investigator in Afghanistan in 2002, stated that "investigations carried out shortly after the alleged killings by highly experienced and respected forensic analysts from Physicians for Human Rights established the presence of recently deceased human remains at Dasht-e Leili and suggested that they were the victims of homicide."
In December 2009 Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) renewed its call for the Obama administration's Department of Justice to investigate why the Bush administration impeded an FBI criminal probe in the wake of the 10 July 2009 front-page article in The New York Times. On 26 December 2009, the Asian Tribune published the full transcript of a video interview given by the officials of Physicians for Human Rights, detailing nearly eight years of advocacy and investigation.
Notes
References
- Risen, James. (10 July 2009). "U.S. Inaction Seen After Taliban P.O.W.'s Died". [[The New York Times]].
- (May 2002). "Study Hints at Mass Killing of the Taliban". [[The New York Times]].
- (14 July 2009). "The Truth About Dasht-i-Leili". [[The New York Times]].
- "Nobody Killed Anybody: America’s Denial of the Deadliest Prisoner Massacre in its History".
- (2 May 2002). "Starved, hurt and buried alive in Afghanistan". [[Independent Online]].
- [http://physiciansforhumanrights.org/issues/mass-atrocities/afghanistan-war-crime/dasht-e-leili-photos.html Dasht-e-Leili Photos; Sheberghan Prison and Pit Locations at Dasht-e-Leili] {{Webarchive. link. (3 March 2012 , Physicians for Human Rights, Retrieved 19 February 2012)
- (July 13, 2009). "Opinion EDITORIAL The Truth About Dasht-i-Leili". New York Times.
- "Assessments and Documentation in Afghanistan {{!}} Assessments in Afghanistan: Dasht-e-Leili".
- Physicians for Human Rights, [http://afghanistan.phrblog.org/download/6/ Preliminary Assessment of Alleged Mass Gravesites in the Area of Mazar-I-Sharif, Afghanistan (Amended)] {{Webarchive. link. (15 June 2009 (pdf), 2002. Report amended 12 December 2008; the original 2002 report is still available from Physicians for Human Rights [http://physiciansforhumanrights.org/forensic/contact/ on request] {{Webarchive). link. (20 July 2008.)
- Heidi Vogt,"[https://www.usatoday.com/news/world/asia/2008-12-12-2525047668_x.htm UN confirms Afghan mass grave site disturbed]," ''USA Today'', 12 December 2008.
- (17 July 2009). "It Is Impossible Prisoners Were Abused". [[Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty]].
- (18 July 2009). "Afghan Warlord Denies Links to '01 Killings". [[The New York Times]].
- Saman Zia-Zarifi. (17 July 2009). "A Response To General Dostum". [[Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty]].
- Currier, Cora. (2013-06-04). "Four Years Ago Obama Promised to Investigate Afghan Massacre. Has Anything Happened Since?".
- (25 August 2002). "The Death Convoy Of Afghanistan". [[Newsweek]].
- "PHR Activities and Investigations Concerning the Mass Gravesite at Dasht-e-Leili Near Sheberghan, Afghanistan". [[Physicians for Human Rights]].
- (23 November 2001). "A Nation challenged: Siege; Fierce Fighting Erupts Near Kunduz, Despite Surrender Deal". The New York Times.
- Oppel Jr, Richard A.. (8 August 2009). "Afghan Leader Courts the Warlord Vote". The New York Times.
- (5 January 2002). "A Nation challenged: The captives; Prison Packed With Taliban Raises Concern". The New York Times.
- Gall, Carlotta. (11 December 2001). "Witnesses Recount Taliban Dying While Held Captive". The New York Times.
- Herman, Edward S.. (September 2009). "The Times Remembers the Dasht-e-Leili Massacre". [[Z Magazine]].
- "Welcome to uExpress featuring Ted Rall -- the Best Advice and Opinions the Universe!".
- (May 2018). "War On Peace: The End of Diplomacy and the Decline of American Influence". W. W. Norton.
- (19 July 2004). "Report: Preliminary Assessment of Alleged Mass Gravesites".
- Smith, James F. [https://www.boston.com/news/world/worldly_boston/2009/07/ny_times_probe_cites_phrs_afgh.html "NY Times probe cites PHR's Afghan work"] {{Webarchive. link. (15 July 2009 in ''[[The Boston Globe]]'' (10 July 2009). Retrieved 25 October 2013.)
- John F. Burns, "Political Realities Impeding Full Inquiry Into Afghan Atrocity, ''The New York Times''", 29 August 2002.
- {{YouTube. EdZlIEVtzN8. War Crimes and the White House: The Bush Administration's Cover-Up of the Dasht-e-Leili Massacre, [[Physicians for Human Rights]]
- Rashid, Ahmed. (2009). "Descent into Chaos: The U.S. and the Disaster in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Central Asia". National Geographic Books.
- [http://m.npr.org/story/106890883 "A Mass Grave In Afghanistan Raises Questions"] {{Webarchive. link. (29 October 2013 on ''[[National Public Radio]]'' (23 July 2009). Retrieved 25 October 2013.)
- Anderson Cooper. (12 July 2009). "Obama orders review of alleged slayings of Taliban in Bush era". [[CNN]].
- Andy Worthington. (14 July 2009). "The Convoy of Death: Will Obama Investigate the Afghan Massacre of November 2001". [[Foreign Policy Journal]].
- Staff (13 July 2009). [http://i2.democracynow.org/2009/7/13/obama_calls_for_probe_into_2001 Obama Calls for Probe into 2001 Massacre of at Least 2,000 Suspected Taliban POWs by US-Backed Afghan Warlord] {{webarchive. link. (5 August 2009 , ''[[Democracy Now!]]'')
- (14 July 2009). "The Truth About Dasht-i-Leili". The New York Times.
- "Brutal massacre of white flag-bearing Taliban surrendees under US watch: No criminal probe yet".
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Dasht-i-Leili massacre — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report