Damnatio memoriae

Etymology

Although the term damnatio memoriae is Latin, the phrase was not used by the ancient Romans, and first appeared in a thesis written in Germany in 1689 by Christoph Schreiter and Johann Heinrich Gerlach. The thesis was titled Dissertationem juridicam de damnatione memoriae, praescitu superiorum, in florentissima Philurea (lit. "A Legal Dissertation on the Damnation of Memory, Foreknown by Superiors, in the Most Flourishing Philurea").

Ancient world

Today's best known examples of damnatio memoriae from antiquity concern chiselling stone inscriptions or deliberately omitting certain information from them.

Ancient Mesopotamia

According to Stefan Zawadzki, the oldest known examples of such practices come from around 3000–2000 BC. He cites the example of Lagash (an ancient city-state founded by the Sumerians in southern Mesopotamia), where preserved inscriptions concerning a conflict with another city-state, Umma, do not mention the ruler of Umma, but describe him as "the man of Umma". Zawadzki sees this as an example of deliberate degradation of the ruler of Umma to the role of an unworthy person whose name and position in history the rulers of Lagash did not want to record for posterity.

Ancient Egypt

Egyptians also practiced this, as seen in relics from pharaoh Akhenaten's tomb and elsewhere. Akhenaten's sole worship of the god Aten, instead of the traditional pantheon, was considered heretical. During his reign, Akhenaten endeavoured to have all references to the god Amun chipped away and removed. After his reign, temples to Aten were dismantled and the stones reused to create other temples. Images of Akhenaten had their faces chipped away, and images and references to Amun reappeared. The people blamed their misfortunes on Akhenaten's shift of worship to Atenism, away from the gods they served before him. Other Egyptian victims of this practice include Hatshepsut and the pharaohs that immediately succeeded Akhenaten, including Smenkhkare, Neferneferuaten, and Ay. The campaign of damnatio memoriae against Akhenaten and his successors was initiated by Ay's successor, Horemheb, who decided to erase from history all pharaohs associated with the unpopular Amarna Period; this process was continued by Horemheb's successors. Tutankhamun was also erased from history in this way, even though he had restored Egypt to the Amun god, because he was one the kings who succeeded Akhenaten; he may also have been Akhenaten's son.

Ancient Greece

The practice was known in Ancient Greece. The Athenians frequently destroyed inscriptions which referred to individuals or events that they no longer wished to commemorate. After Timotheus was convicted of treason and removed from his post as general in 373BC, all references to him as a general were deleted from the previous year's naval catalogue. The most complete example is their systematic removal of all references to the Antigonids from inscriptions in their city, in 200BC when they were besieged by the Antigonid king Philip V of Macedon during the Second Macedonian War. One decree praising Demetrius Poliorcetes (Philip V's great-grandfather) was smashed and thrown down a well.

After Herostratus set fire to the Temple of Artemis, one of the Seven Wonders of antiquity, the people of Ephesus banned the mention of his name.

At Delphi, an honorific inscription erected between 337 and 327 BC for Aristotle and his nephew Callisthenes, two philosophers who were closely associated with the Macedonians, were smashed and thrown in a well after the death of Alexander of Macedon in 323BC.

Ancient Rome

In ancient Rome, the practice of damnatio memoriae was the condemnation of emperors after their deaths. If the Senate or a later emperor did not like the acts of an emperor, they could have his property seized, his name erased and his statues reworked (normally defaced).

Compounding this difficulty is the fact that a completely successful damnatio memoriae results—by definition—in the full and total erasure of the subject from the historical record. In the case of figures such as emperors or consuls it is unlikely that complete success was possible, as even comprehensive obliteration of the person's existence and actions in records and the like would continue to be historically visible without extensive reworking. The impracticality of such a cover-up could be vast—in the case of Emperor Geta, for example, coins bearing his effigy proved difficult to entirely remove from circulation for several years, even though the mere mention of his name was punishable by death.

Difficulties in implementation also arose if there was not full and enduring agreement with the punishment, such as when the Senate's condemnation of Nero was implemented—leading to attacks on many of his statues—but subsequently evaded with the enormous funeral he was given by Vitellius. Similarly, it was often difficult to prevent later historians from "resurrecting" the memory of the sanctioned person.

The impossibility of actually erasing memory of an emperor has led scholars to conclude that this was not actually the goal of damnatio. Instead, they understand damnatio: those gaps had once contained, and the reasons why the text had been removed|Polly Low, "Remembering, Forgetting, and Rewriting the Past"}}List of condemned Roman emperorsThese emperors are known to have been erased from monuments:

Middle Ages

In the Middle Ages, heresiarchs could have their memory condemned. The Council of Constance decreed the damnatio memoriae of John Wycliffe.

The practice of replacing pagan beliefs and motifs with Christian, and purposefully not recording the pagan history, has been compared to damnatio memoriae as well.

In her book Medici Women - Portraits of Power, Love and Betrayal, Gabrielle Langdon also presents compelling evidence concerning a probable damnatio memoriae issued against Isabella de' Medici, a prominent female figure of the 16th century Renaissance Medici court.

Americas

Ancient Maya

Several apparent damnatio memoriae incidents occurred within the Maya civilization during the Classic period (AD 250–900) as a result of political conflicts between leaders of the local kingdoms.

One notable incident occurred in the kingdom of Paʼ Chan (modern-day Yaxchilan, Mexico) in the middle of the 8th century. In June 742, the k'uhul ajaw (Holy Lord, i.e. king) of Pa' Chan, Itzamnaaj Bahlam III, died after a 60-year-long rule, during which he turned his kingdom into one of great riches after a large number of military campaigns which were recorded and illustrated on multiple high-quality stelae, lintels and hieroglyphic steps of temples which he dedicated to his military success (e.g. Temple 44) and his family (e.g. Temple 23). Though he had a son who eventually ascended to the throne after his death, there was a mysterious decade-long interregnum period in which Pa' Chan did not record the existence of any king. Itzamnaaj Bahlam's son, Yaxun Bʼalam IV, also known as Bird Jaguar IV, ascended to the throne in April 752, nearly ten years after his father's death.

This interregnum period may be explained by a text from the nearby northern kingdom of Yokib (modern-day Piedras Negras, Guatemala). Panel 3 of this city, largely regarded as one of the most beautiful pieces of Mayan art, was carved approximately in 782 and illustrates an episode of the reign of Itzam Kʼan Ahk II (also known as Pawaaj Kʼan Ahk II), in which he celebrated his first kʼatun (period of 7200 days) as king, on 27 July 749. Panel 3 claims that the celebration "was witnessed by Sak Jukub Yopaat Bahlam, Holy Lord of Paʼ Chan." Also known as Yopaat Bahlam II, this mysterious ruler does not appear anywhere else in the historical record, not even in his supposed homeland. Moreoever, his respectful presence at a celebration in Yokib, Paʼ Chan's centuries-old and bitter rival (which had, in fact, scored a victory in battle against Itzamnaaj Bahlam III in 726), as well as the depiction of Itzam Kʼan Ahk apparently addressing a speech (now hardly readable, but probably involving an event of Paʼ Chan's past) toward a party from Paʼ Chan—which included his son and "heir to the throne" of Paʼ Chan (chʼok paʼchan ajaw), Sihyaj Ahkteʼ—, possibly indicate that he ruled as a vassal of Itzam Kʼan Ahk, or that he used the celebration as an opportunity to ask for Itzam Kʼan Ahk's support against Yaxun Bʼalam IV, his political rival. This has led to the conclusion that if this man truly ruled Paʼ Chan, any records of his existence were destroyed during the reign of Yaxun Bʼalam IV, who notoriously led a massive propaganda campaign throughout his rule to claim legitimacy over the throne, which involved the rewriting of his kingdom's dynastic history and restoration of several historical records of previous kings. The immense texts writing Yaxun Bʼalam's own version of his kingdom's dynastic history may have been carved over existing records which would have been intentionally erased with plaster, possibly destroying the records of the king (or kings) of the interregnum.

It is possible Yopaat Bahlam and his son lived the rest of their lives in exile at Yokib, and that the "heir to the throne" never rose to power. Yopaat Bahlam may have been buried in Burial 13 of the city, judging from a text carved on four Spondylus limbatus shells found within it which bears his name and mentions that he had previously visited the city in January 747, also within the interregnum.

New Spain

Notorious incidents of damnatio memoriae occurred during the existence of the Viceroyalty of New Spain, the Spanish colony that emerged after the Spanish conquest of Mexico in 1521. Various viceroys ordered the destruction of monuments and documents depicting certain episodes of pre-Columbian Mesoamerican history and rebels to Spanish rule over the Americas.

For instance, Moctezuma I (not to be confused with his more famous great-grandson Moctezuma II), 15th-century huei tlahtoani (Great Speaker, i.e. emperor) of the Excan Tlahtoloyan ( Triple Capital), known by historians as the Mexica or Aztec Empire (also known as the Aztec Triple Alliance, whose inhabitants referred to themselves as Culhua-Mexica), ordered the creation of a portrait of himself and of his military and political advisor Tlacaelel at Chapultepec, a historically and naturally important site which is within Mexico City in modern times. This became a tradition among subsequent Mexica rulers, and portraits of Axayacatl and Ahuizotl, two of Moctezuma's successors, were also made throughout the rest of the century (Tizoc's absence may be explained by his sudden death from poisoning). Moctezuma II would create the last portrait of this kind in 1519 (which believes might be "the last Aztec monument"), at the eve of the Spanish conquest.

Antonio de León y Gama, a distinguished Mexican intellectual, wrote in the late 18th century that these portraits were well preserved up until that century. León y Gama claimed that the only portrait he got to see himself was Moctezuma II's, before its destruction was ordered by the authorities in 1753 or 1754. He mentioned that Axayacatl's portrait still existed earlier in that century before it was "broken up and removed." Indeed, the remains of Moctezuma's portrait, approximately 2 meters (over 6 feet) high, reveal that its damage was not accidental or natural. It was carved on pink-to-gray andesite, which is "slightly harder than marble," according to Hajovsky. The markings in the damaged parts show that apparently its destruction was executed with the dropping of a boulder, and that deep holes were drilled "perhaps in order to pry the stone apart or blow it up."

In another notorious instance, Spanish bishop Juan de Zumárraga ordered the destruction of a portrait depicting Nezahualcoyotl, king of Texcoco, on 7 July 1539, along with various other sculptures at the Hill of Texcotzingo "in a manner such that they would no longer be remembered."

During the Mexican War of Independence, which started in 1810, one of the earliest revolutionary leaders, Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla, nowadays remembered as a national Hero, was executed by the Spanish authorities in 1811. After his execution, according to contemporary accounts, the authorities declared a damnatio memoriae. According to one of Hidalgo's soldiers, Pedro García (1790–1873), "the fierce war against Hidalgo's memory and his ideas" was done through strict censorship.

The Spanish efforts to erase his memory, however, were in vain. The War of Independence continued, and the leaders who continued the revolution after Hidalgo's death made great efforts to commemorate his legacy. José María Morelos, for example, declared in 1813 that 16 September, the anniversary of the beginning of the war, would be celebrated every year "remembering always the merit of the great Hero Don Miguel Hidalgo and his partner Don Ignacio Allende."

Similar practices in modern times

While complete damnatio memoriae has not been attempted in modern times—naming or writing about a person fallen from favour has never been made subject to formal punishment—there are several examples of less total damnatio memoriae in modern times.

Soviet Union

During the Soviet period

Main article: Censorship of images in the Soviet Union

In the Soviet Union, photos were retouched to remove individuals such as Leon Trotsky, Nikolay Yezhov, and even Stalin. After Stalin ordered the murder of Grigory Kulik's wife Kira Kulik-Simonich, all photographic records of her were destroyed; although she was described as very pretty, no photographs or other images of her survive. Following their fall from favour, Lavrentiy Beria and others were removed from articles in the Great Soviet Encyclopedia.

The graphic designer David King had a strong interest in Soviet art and design, and amassed a collection of over 250,000 images. His most striking examples of before-and-after alterations were published as The Commissar Vanishes.

''Damnatio memoriae'' of the Soviet Union in post-Communist countries

Following the fall of communism in Eastern Europe, many communist statues, particularly of Lenin and Stalin, were removed from former Soviet satellite states. Following a 2015 decision, a process of decommunization in Ukraine successfully dismantled all 1,320 statues of Lenin after its independence, as well as renaming roads and structures named under Soviet authority.

Poland

19th century Polish writers often omitted mentioning two kings from the list of Polish monarchs, Bezprym and Wenceslaus III of Bohemia, which has resulted in their being omitted from many later works as well.

China

The treatment of Chinese politician Zhao Ziyang following his fall from grace inside the Chinese Communist Party is regarded as another modern case of damnatio memoriae.

The major painting The Founding Ceremony of the Nation has been modified several times as individuals depicted have fallen from political favour or been rehabilitated.

Germany

The destruction of all copies of The Victory of Faith in order to erase Ernst Röhm is considered an act of Nazi damnatio memoriae. In the end, two copies survived: one preserved in London and one preserved by the Communist government of East Germany.

North Korea

In December 2013, Jang Song-thaek was abruptly accused of being a counter-revolutionary and was stripped of all his posts, expelled from the Workers' Party of Korea (WPK), arrested and executed. His photos were removed from official media and his image digitally removed from photos with other North Korean leaders.

United Kingdom

An instance of damnatio memoriae-esque policy instituted without governmental decree occurred in the aftermath of the Jimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal. Following extensive accusations of sexually abusing underage, disabled, and dead individuals, various public institutions in the United Kingdom took extensive measures to remove posthumous relics of Savile's public presence. This included taking down monuments and memorials to Savile (including his headstone), rechristening locations and awards previously named after him, dissolving charity organizations named after him, and suppressing episodes of television and radio shows which featured or explicitly referenced him. In the immediate aftermath of the scandal, BBC News reporter Finlo Rohrer commented that "As bloggers have already noted, the Romans would have understood the Savile erasures as damnatio memoriae [...] people will be able to see the spot where a plaque to him once rested. They may know that a path was once named after him."

Fiction

The practice is a key function of the Big Brother government in Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell, associated with the Newspeak word "unperson" which has resultantly become another general synonym for it. TV Tropes uses this term in listing numerous other fictional cases.

Analysis

The term is used in modern scholarship to cover a wide array of official and unofficial sanctions through which the physical remnants and memories of a deceased individual are destroyed.

Looking at cases of damnatio memoriae in modern Irish history, Guy Beiner has argued that iconoclastic vandalism only makes martyrs of the "dishonored", thus ensuring that they will be remembered for all time. Nonetheless, Beiner goes on to argue that the purpose of damnatio memoriae—rather than being to erase people from history—was to guarantee only negative memories of those who were so dishonored. Pointing out that damnatio memoriae did not erase people from history but in effect kept their memory alive, Beiner concluded that those who partake in the destruction of a monument should be considered agents of memory.

Author Charles Hedrick proposes that a distinction be made between damnatio memoriae (the condemnation of a deceased person) and abolitio memoriae (the actual erasure of another from historical texts).

In case of removal of Soviet monuments in Eastern Europe, the primary reason was that they were established as a symbol of occupation, domination or cult of personality, rather than simple historic mark. It has been pointed out that all Nazi-established monuments and street names have been removed after World War II which has been perceived as natural reaction after liberation at that time.

References

Bibliography

References

1. (January 2010). "History and Silence: Purge and Rehabilitation of Memory in Late Antiquity". University of Texas Press.
2. Omissi, Adrastos. (28 June 2018). "Emperors and Usurpers in the Later Roman Empire: Civil War, Panegyric, and the Construction of Legitimacy". OUP Oxford.
3. Zawadzki, Stefan. (2011). "Damnatio memoriae w europejskiej kulturze politycznej". IPN.
4. Wilkinson, Richard H.. (1 January 2011). "Controlled Damage: The Mechanics and Micro-History of the Damnatio Memoriae Carried Out in KV-23, the Tomb of Ay". Journal of Egyptian History.
5. Jarus, Owen. (24 July 2014). "Egyptian Carving Defaced by King Tut's Possible Father Discovered".
6. Redford, Donald. (1984). "Akhenaten: The Heretic King". Princeton University Press.
7. (9 November 2020). "The Routledge Companion to Women and Monarchy in the Ancient Mediterranean World". Taylor & Francis.
8. Callataÿ, François De. (18 May 2020). "Celebrity, Fame, and Infamy in the Hellenistic World". University of Toronto Press.
9. Byrne, S. G.. (2010). "Philathenaios : studies in honour of Michael J. Osborne". Hellēnikē Epigraphikē Hetaireia.
10. (26 September 2023). "Herostratus: The man who destroyed an ancient wonder of the world".
11. Harriet I. Flower, The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace & Oblivion in Roman Political Culture (University of North Carolina Press, 2006).
12. "Geta: The One Who Died".
13. (2013). "Finding Nero: shining a new light on Romano-British sculpture". Internet Archaeology.
14. Sandys, John. (1919). "Latin epigraphy: an introduction to the study of Latin inscriptions". [[Cambridge UP]].
15. Gizewski, Christian. (1 October 2006). "Damnatio memoriae: Historisch". Brill.
16. Edoardo Bianchi. (2014). "Il senato e la "damnatio memoriae" da Caligola a Domiziano". Politica Antica.
17. "Article". riviste.unimi.it.
18. Strzelczyk, Jerzy. (1987). "Od Prasłowian do Polaków". Krajowa Agencja Wydawnicza.
19. Langdon, Gabrielle. (2007). "Medici Women – Portraits of Power, Love and Betrayal". University of Toronto Press.
20. (2008). "Chronicle of the Maya Kings and Queens". [[Thames & Hudson]].
21. (2019). "El Panel 3 de Piedras Negras. Historias desafiantes y recuerdos ignominiosos". [[Arqueología Mexicana]].
22. (2013). "El nombre náhuatl de la Triple Alianza". Estudios de cultura náhuatl.
23. Hajovsky, Patrick Thomas. (2015). "On the Lips of Others: Moteuczoma's Fame in Aztec Monuments and Rituals". [[University of Texas Press]].
24. Brenes Tencio, Guillermo. (2010). "Miguel Hidalgo a la luz del arte: iconografía del héroe nacional — Padre de la Patria mexicana (siglos XIX y XX)". [[University of Costa Rica]].
25. Kohonen, Iina. (1 July 2017). "Picturing the Cosmos: A Visual History of Early Soviet Space Endeavor". Intellect Books.
26. (1 September 1999). ""The Commissar Vanishes" in ''The Vanishing Commissar''".
27. (14 January 2016). "Public Places: Sites of Political Communication". Rowman & Littlefield.
28. Joseph Abraham, (2020) ''Kings, Conquerors, Psychopaths: From Alexander to Hitler to the Corporation'', Hidden Hills Press, p. 147 {{ISBN. 9780578680590.
29. (22 October 2018). "The Materiality of Text – Placement, Perception, and Presence of Inscribed Texts in Classical Antiquity: Placement, perception, and presence of inscribed texts in classical antiquity". BRILL.
30. Nead, Lynda. (August 1999). "Law and the Image: The Authority of Art and the Aesthetics of Law". University of Chicago Press.
31. Wilford, Greg. (20 August 2017). "Ukraine has removed all 1,320 statues of Lenin". The Independent.
32. Mroziewicz, Karolina. (2020). "Same Kings, Different Narratives: Illustrated Catalogues of Rulers of Poland, Bohemia and Hungary in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries". Zeitschrift für Ostmitteleuropa-Forschung.
33. Gerard, Bonnie. "Damnatio Memoriae in China: Zhao Ziyang Is Laid to Rest". The Diplomat.
34. "Smarthistory – Dong Xiwen, the Founding of the Nation".
35. Álvarez, Jorge. (19 November 2019). ""La victoria de la fe", el documental propagandístico del nazismo que Hitler mandó destruir". La Brújula Verde.
36. Trimborn, Jürgen. (2008). "Leni Riefenstahl: A Life". Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
37. (10 December 2013). "Der retuschierte Onkel". Der Spiegel.
38. Rohrer, Finlo. (1 November 2012). "Jimmy Savile: Erasing the memory". BBC.
39. Davies, Katie. (13 October 2012). "Jimmy Savile removed from Great North Run history". [[Evening Chronicle]].
40. Jeeves, Paul. (9 October 2012). "Council orders removal of Jimmy Savile tribute". Daily Express.
41. (10 October 2012). "Jimmy Savile's headstone removed from Scarborough cemetery". BBC News.
42. (10 October 2012). "Savile's headstone removed by family". The Irish Times.
43. (17 October 2012). "Jimmy Savile cafe renamed at Stoke Mandeville".
44. (23 October 2012). "Jimmy Savile charities have no future, say trustees". BBC News.
45. (2 November 2012). "BBC axes Jimmy Savile 'Top of the Pops' reruns". Digital Spy.
46. (20 January 2013). "BBC receives 216 complaints for Tweenies Jimmy Savile spoof". BBC News.
47. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Unperson
48. Varner, Eric R.. (2004). "Monumenta Graeca et Romana: Mutilation and transformation: damnatio memoriae and Roman imperial portraiture". BRILL.
49. "The Oxford Handbook of Roman Sculpture". Oxford.
50. Beiner, Guy. (2018). "Forgetful Remembrance: Social Forgetting and Vernacular; Historiography of a Rebellion in Ulster". [[Oxford University Press]].
51. Beiner, Guy. (2007). "Remembering the Year of the French: Irish Folk History and Social Memory". [[University of Wisconsin Press]].
52. Beiner, Guy. (2021). "When Monuments Fall: The Significance of Decommemorating". Éire-Ireland.
53. Hedrick, Charles W. Jr.. (2000). "History and Silence: Purge and Rehabilitation of Memory in Late Antiquity". [[University of Texas Press]].
54. Andrejevs, Dmitrijs. (17 August 2022). "Ukraine war prompts Baltic states to remove Soviet memorials".
55. "Should Soviet monuments be dismantled or preserved? – DW – 07/09/2023".