Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/cultural-concepts

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Culturgen

Term used to denote a unit of culture


Term used to denote a unit of culture

Culturgen (culture + -gen) is a term used to denote a theoretical 'unit' of culture or cultural evolution. More specifically, analogous to a gene, it is a cultural artifact or element of behaviour whose repetition or reproduction is transmissible from one generation to the next. It has largely been displaced by the similar term meme.

The term was coined in 1980 by two American scientists—the biomathematician Charles J. Lumsden and the sociobiologist E. O. Wilson—in a controversial attempt to analyse cultural evolution by using techniques borrowed from population genetics, to develop a comprehensive theory of how genes interact with cultural variation, and to infer a theory of the evolution of the human mind.

The fullest exposition of their theory appeared in their book Genes, Mind, and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process (1981), which expanded upon the agenda that Wilson had laid out in Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (1975) and On Human Nature (1978). In the book, the two assume that culturgens are stored in long-term memory, are readily observable in the external world, and are to be transmitted via socialization. Genes, Mind, and Culture received many highly negative reviews in the scientific press, however; it was re-issued in 2005 with a review of subsequent developments.

It also effectively means much the same as the older term cultural trait used by anthropologists, and offers similar difficulties of identification and definition. The term has declined in popularity; the slightly older term meme—coined by Richard Dawkins in his book The Selfish Gene (1976)—is now used in its stead, almost universally (even by Wilson in his later writings).

References

References

  1. (September 2022). "Culturgen".
  2. Lumsden, Charles J., and E. O. Wilson. 1980. ''[[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA]]'' 77(4382).
  3. Bell, Adrian, and Peter Richerson. 2008. "[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23636652_Charles_J_Lumsden_and_Edward_O_Wilson_Genes_Mind_and_Culture_25th_Anniversary_Edition Review - Charles J. Lumsden and Edward O. Wilson, Genes, Mind, and Culture: 25th Anniversary Edition]." ''Journal of Bioeconomics'' 10:307–14. {{doi. 10.1007/s10818-008-9041-x.
  4. Lumsden, Charles J., and E. O. Wilson. 1982. "The ‘Culturgen’: Science or Science Fiction?" ''[[Behavioral and Brain Sciences]]'' 5(1):12–13. {{doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00010190.
  5. William, B. J. 1982. "[https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1525/aa.1982.84.4.02a00080 Have We a Darwin of Biocultural Evolution?] [PDF]." ''American Anthropologist'' 84:848–52. [Review of ''Genes, Mind, and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process''].
  6. Lumsden, Charles J., and E. O. Wilson. 2005. ''Genes, Mind, And Culture: The Coevolutionary Process'' (25th Anniversary ed.). Singapore: World Scientific. [https://books.google.com/books?id=VOXICgAAQBAJ&dq=Culturgen&pg=PA384 Google Books].
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Culturgen — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report