From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Counternull
In statistics, and especially in the statistical analysis of psychological data, the counternull is a statistic used to aid the understanding and presentation of research results. It revolves around the effect size, which is the mean magnitude of some effect divided by the standard deviation.
The counternull value is the effect size that is just as well supported by the data as the null hypothesis. In particular, when results are drawn from a distribution that is symmetrical about its mean, the counternull value is exactly twice the observed effect size.
The null hypothesis is a hypothesis set up to be tested against an alternative. Thus the counternull is an alternative hypothesis that, when used to replace the null hypothesis, generates the same p-value as had the original null hypothesis of “no difference.”{{cite journal | author-link = Dawn Iacobucci | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20051108183721/http://wiscinfo.doit.wisc.edu/jcr/PDFs/p-values.pdf | archive-date = 2005-11-08 | url-status = dead
Some researchers contend that reporting the counternull, in addition to the p-value, serves to counter two common errors of judgment:{{cite journal | doi-access = | url-access = subscription
- assuming that failure to reject the null hypothesis at the chosen level of statistical significance means that the observed size of the "effect" is zero; and
- assuming that rejection of the null hypothesis at a particular p-value means that the measured "effect" is not only statistically significant, but also scientifically important. These arbitrary statistical thresholds create a discontinuity, causing unnecessary confusion and artificial controversy.
Other researchers prefer confidence intervals as a means of countering these common errors.
References
References
- (2002). "Steven's handbook of experimental psychology". John Wiley & Sons.
- (2000). "Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: a correlational approach". Cambridge University Press.
- Pasher (2002), p. 348: "The reject/fail-to-reject [the null hypothesis] dichotomy keeps the field awash in confusion and artificial controversy."
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Counternull — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report