From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Coercion
Forcing involuntary behavior in another
Forcing involuntary behavior in another
Coercion involves compelling a party to act in an involuntary manner through the use of threats, including threats to use force against that party. It involves a set of forceful actions which violate the free will of an individual in order to induce a desired response. These actions may include extortion, blackmail, or even torture and sexual assault. Common-law systems codify the act of violating a law while under coercion as a duress crime.
Coercion used as leverage may force victims to act in a way contrary to their own interests. Coercion can involve not only the infliction of bodily harm but also psychological abuse (the latter intended to enhance the perceived credibility of the threat). The threat of further harm may also lead to the acquiescence of the person being coerced. Although the concepts of coercion and persuasion are similar, various factors distinguish the two. These include the intent, the willingness to cause harm, the result of the interaction, and the options available to the coerced party.
Political authors such as John Rawls, Thomas Nagel, and Ronald Dworkin consider whether governments are inherently coercive. In 1919, Max Weber, building on the view of Rudolf von Ihering, defined a state as "a human community that (successfully) claims a monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force". Morris argues that the state can operate through incentives rather than coercion. Healthcare systems may use informal coercion to make a patient adhere to a doctor's treatment plan. Under certain circumstances, medical staff may use physical coercion to treat a patient involuntarily, a practice which raises ethical concerns. Such practices has also been shown to cause moral distress among healthcare staff, especially when staff attitudes toward coercive measures are negative. To minimize the need for coercion in psychiatric care, various models like Safewards, as well as Six Core Strategies, have been implemented with promising results.
Overview
The purpose of coercion is to substitute one's aims with weaker ones that the aggressor wants the victim to have. For this reason, many social philosophers have considered coercion as the polar opposite to freedom. Various forms of coercion are distinguished: first on the basis of the kind of injury threatened, second according to its aims and scope, and finally according to its effects, from which its legal, social, and ethical implications mostly depend.
Physical
Physical coercion is the most commonly considered form of coercion, where the content of the conditional threat is the use of force against a victim, their relatives or property. An often used example is "putting a gun to someone's head" (at gunpoint) or putting a "knife under the throat" (at knifepoint or cut-throat) to compel action under the threat that non-compliance may result in the attacker harming or even killing the victim. These are so common that they are also used as metaphors for other forms of coercion.
Armed forces in many countries use firing squads to maintain discipline and intimidate the masses, or opposition, into submission or silent compliance. However, there also are nonphysical forms of coercion, where the threatened injury does not immediately imply the use of force. In 2000, Byman and Waxman defined coercion as "the use of threatened force, including the limited use of actual force to back up the threat, to induce an adversary to behave differently than it otherwise would." Coercion does not in many cases amount to destruction of property or life since compliance is the goal.
Pain compliance
Notes
References
- Lifton, Robert J. (1961) Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism, Penguin Books.
References
- (December 2023). "Definition of coercion". Merriam-Webster.
- Schelling, Thomas C.. (1966). "Arms and Influence". Yale University Press.
- Pape, Robert A.. (1996). "Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War". Cornell University Press.
- Powers, Penny. (2007-06-12). "Persuasion and Coercion: A Critical Review of Philosophical and Empirical Approaches". HEC Forum.
- Morris, Christopher W.. (January 2012). "State Coercion and Force". Social Philosophy and Policy.
- (2014). "Max Weber, Rationality and Modernity". Routledge.
- Weber, Max. (1919). "Politics as a Vocation".
- (2009). "One Nation Under Contract: The Outsourcing of American Power and the Future of Foreign Policy". Yale University Press.
- (2016). "Clinical Relevance of Informal Coercion in Psychiatric Treatment – A Systematic Review". Frontiers in Psychiatry.
- (2014-12-04). "Ethical challenges in connection with the use of coercion: a focus group study of health care personnel in mental health care". BMC Medical Ethics.
- (2025-02-28). "Moral distress among inpatient child and adolescent psychiatry staff: a mixed-methods study of experiences and associated factors". Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health.
- Bowers, L.. (August 2014). "Safewards: a new model of conflict and containment on psychiatric wards". Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing.
- (October 2017). "Outcomes of the Victorian Safewards trial in 13 wards: Impact on seclusion rates and fidelity measurement". International Journal of Mental Health Nursing.
- Bhatia, K. L.. (2010). "Textbook on Legal Language and Legal Writing". Universal Law Publishing.
- (2000). "Kosovo and the Great Air Power Debate". [[International Security]].
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Coercion — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report