Climate Change Act 2008

Carbon emissions target

On 16 October 2008 Ed Miliband, Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, announced that the Act would mandate an 80% cut overall in six greenhouse gases by 2050.

When first published the Government proposed that the Act would set a target of a 60% cut, excluding international aviation and shipping, a figure that had been a Government ambition for some years. The original 60% figure was adopted based on the recommendation of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, made in their June 2000 report Energy – The Changing Environment.{{cite web |access-date=2007-03-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070103000009/http://www.rcep.org.uk/news/00-2.htm |archive-date=3 January 2007 |url-status=dead |access-date=2007-03-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070220162203/http://www.rcep.org.uk/newenergy.htm |archive-date=20 February 2007 |url-status=dead |access-date=2007-03-16

The Royal Commission's figures were based on a June 1996 decision of the EU Council of Ministers to limit emissions to 550 ppm, contained in their Community Strategy on Climate Change.{{cite web |access-date=2007-03-15 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080128225004/http://ue.eu.int/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/envir/011a0006.htm |archive-date=28 January 2008

A scientific assessment at the 2005 international Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change conference, held in Exeter under the UK presidency of the G8,{{cite web |access-date=2007-03-15 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930154651/http://www.gnn.gov.uk/content/detail.asp?NewsAreaID=2&ReleaseID=134475 |archive-date=30 September 2007 |access-date=2007-03-15 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20060318090104/http://www.stabilisation2005.com/outcomes.html |archive-date=18 March 2006}}

Based on the current rate of increase – averaging about 2 ppm per year{{cite web |access-date=2007-03-17 |access-date=2007-04-20

Following pressure from the public, MPs and a recommendation from the Climate Change Committee, the 80% target was finally adopted.

Legislative progress

The procedure for enacting legislation in the United Kingdom Parliament sometimes involves numerous consultative and debating stages.

Previous bill

The 2008 Climate Change Bill was preceded by a Private member's bill of the same name{{cite web|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/pabills/200506/climate_change.htm|title= 2005 Climate Change Bill |access-date=2007-03-14 |archive-date=25 November 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061125084031/http://www.epolitix.com/EN/Legislation/200507/86622a91-d7f8-44b0-a6d7-032c64f3c778.htm |url-status=usurped

Early day motion

Shortly after the 2005 general election, 412 of the 646 Members of Parliament signed an early day motion calling for a Climate Change Bill to be introduced, to include a requirement for 3% annual cuts in carbon emissions.{{cite web |access-date=2007-03-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060113141314/http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=28373 |archive-date=13 January 2006 |url-status=dead |access-date=2007-03-15 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070324004623/http://www.southhamsfoe.co.uk/node/168 |archive-date=24 March 2007

Pre-legislative scrutiny

The Labour Government announced the introduction of a Climate Change Bill in the Queen's speech, on 15 November 2006. The draft Bill was published on 13 March 2007, but proposed five-year 'carbon budgets' rather than the annual targets many had called for. The Government believe that varying weather conditions make annual targets impractical.{{cite news |access-date=2007-03-15

The draft Bill was scrutinised by three parliamentary committees. A Joint Select Committee of 24 members from the House of Lords and the House of Commons, chaired by Lord Puttnam, was immediately established to scrutinize the Bill. The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Select Committee of the House of Commons also carried out its own inquiry into the draft Bill, as did the Environmental Audit Committee. These Committees received evidence from a series of interested parties between April and July and cast votes on the final wording of their reports.

Among the critics giving evidence was Nigel Lawson who argued that the entire concept was counter-productive because humans would easily be able to adapt to the worst predictions of a 4-degree rise in temperature by the end of the century because, with an average world economic growth of 2%, they would be "seven times as well off as we are today", therefore it was not reasonable to impose a sacrifice on the "much poorer present generation".

The Government response to the report was printed in October 2007.

Lords debates

The Bill was introduced to the House of Lords by the Government on 14 November 2007. The first debate on the floor of the House (Second Reading) was held on 27 November 2007 and lasted six hours. This was followed by eight sittings in the Committee Stage, four further sittings at Report Stage and one more for Third Reading. All of these sittings (including Committee stage) took place on the floor of the House and ten votes for various amendments.

One of the votes rejected a proposal by a majority of 148 to 51 to change the target for 2050 from 60% to 80% below baseline 1990 emissions on the basis that they should wait for new scientific advice from the Committee on Climate Change before changing the target from 60%.

An amendment, to remove the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change's absolute duty to ensure that the 2050 target was met, and replace it with a duty to propose policies to meet the target, was narrowly defeated by 132 votes to 130 in the Third Reading in the House of Lords on 31 March 2008. The bill passed to the House of Commons.

Commons debates

On 9 June 2008, following the Second Reading of the Bill, only five members of the House of Commons voted against. The five were Christopher Chope, Philip Davies, Peter Lilley, Andrew Tyrie, and Ann Widdecombe.

During the debate on the Third Reading on 28 October, the government rejected an opposition amendment to allow the Secretary of State to set the maximum level of carbon dioxide that may be emitted per unit of output by any generating station. After the Committee on Climate Change's advice on the level of the 2050 target was brought forward, the 2050 target was revised from 60% of 1990 carbon dioxide emissions to 80% of the six major greenhouse gas emissions at the instigation of the government. It was also agreed that the British share of aviation and shipping emissions would form part of the target, when a method of measuring these could be agreed.{{cite web|url=https://www.ft.com/content/b511d18a-a53f-11dd-b4f5-000077b07658|title=MPs support tough bill on CO2 reporting|publisher=Financial Times

The bill passed into law on 26 November 2008.

Amendments

In 2019, by the Climate Change Act 2008 (2050 Target Amendment) Order, Section 1 of the Act was amended, replacing the target to reduce greenhouse gases by 80 per cent by 2050 with a target of 100 per cent.

Positions

Political parties

The opposition Conservative Party supported the concept of a bill, and proposed their own variation ahead of the Government's. One of the key differences is that they were demanding annual carbon targets, and that the Committee on Climate Change should have an enhanced role, setting targets as well as advising governments.

The Liberal Democrats took a similar stance to the Conservatives, and were also of the opinion that setting targets every five years would be an abdication of responsibility, because a government typically remains in power for only four years. They also stated that the proposed 60% cut by 2050 may not be sufficient, and that "we may well need to aim more towards about 80%".

A stronger response was provided by the Green Party of England and Wales. They considered that legislation provides a 'massive opportunity', but that the draft Bill was 'dangerously unambitious'. Among their demands were annual targets and an overall emission cut of 90% by 2050.{{cite web |access-date=2007-03-14 |access-date=2007-03-14 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070214084828/http://www.respectcoalition.org/index.php?sec=39 |archive-date=14 February 2007

Among the nationalist political parties whose views were known, the concept of a Climate Change Bill was supported in principle by the Scottish National Party and the Democratic Unionist Party.{{cite web |access-date=2007-03-14 |access-date=2007-03-14 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20070527195338/http://www.plaidcymru.org/content.php?nID=14;ID=157 |archive-date=27 May 2007}}

The UK Independence Party believed that the Bill was only necessary because of a failure to devise a viable plan for other sources of energy to replace fossil fuels. They considered that the Bill was 'deeply misguided', likely to cripple the economy and that it would destroy investment in alternative technologies. Instead they believed that the Government and Opposition 'need to be looking into proper alternatives like nuclear power', and that plans to invest in renewable alternative energies such as wind power and solar power, as well as cutting carbon emissions by 60%, were 'unachievable and unnecessary'.{{cite web |access-date=2007-03-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070322212822/http://www.ukip.org/ukip_news/gen12.php?t=1&id=2910 |archive-date=22 March 2007 |url-status=dead

Environmental groups

Friends of the Earth's Big Ask Campaign was one of the factors that influenced the government to include the Climate Change Bill in their legislative programme. The organisation demanded that the Bill should include legally binding targets for a reduction of at least 3% a year, amounting a total cut of around 80% by 2050. They considered that a 60% cut in carbon emissions by 2050 was not a sufficient contribution from developed countries to the international action on climate change.

The UK arm of WWF supported the Bill, but launched its Get on Board campaign for the 2050 carbon reduction target to be raised to at least 80%, including the UK share of emissions from international aviation and shipping. In addition, WWF-UK called for retention of the House of Lords' amendment that at least 70% of the UK's reduction should be achieved domestically (limiting to 30% the proportion of the reduction that can be achieved through purchasing 'carbon credits').

The other 50 or so environmental, international development and other organisations belonging to the Stop Climate Chaos coalition backed the Big Ask Campaign and shared similar views. The coalition itself criticised the Government for failing to acknowledge the 'global warming danger threshold' of 2 °C. Taking this into account, they believed that the 2020 target should be a minimum of 30%, with an 80% target for 2050. They also considered that the Bill should include annual 3% reduction targets, cover aviation and shipping within its scope, and ban the purchase of carbon credits from overseas, a practice which they believe exports the emissions problem elsewhere.{{cite web |access-date=2007-03-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071007154853/http://www.icount.org.uk/news/i_count_media/news_releases_i_count/198.asp |archive-date=7 October 2007 |url-status=dead

The Joint Public Issues Team of the Baptist, Methodist, and United Reformed churches called for an 80% reduction in carbon emissions [by 2050], for not ignoring the contribution of air and sea travel, and for reductions of the United Kingdom's own emissions rather than relying on buying carbon credits from other countries.

Trade unions and businesses

The Confederation of British Industry, which has created its own climate change task force, welcomed the proposed Bill, stating that it combined two vital elements, long-term clarity on policy direction and flexibility in its delivery.{{cite web |access-date=2007-03-14 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070513190040/http://www.cbi.org.uk/ndbs/press.nsf/0363c1f07c6ca12a8025671c00381cc7/c89c2266d47c69128025729d003952ef?OpenDocument |archive-date=13 May 2007

Support for the Bill was also given by the Trades Union Congress.{{cite web |access-date=2007-03-14 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070318155814/http://www.tuc.org.uk/economy/tuc-13068-f0.cfm |archive-date=18 March 2007

Committee on Climate Change

The Committee on Climate Change, whose powers are invested by Part 2 of the Act, was formally launched in December 2008 with Lord Adair Turner as its chair. There is also an Adaptation Sub-Committee (ASC), which sets the direction for adaptation matters including independent advice on preparing for climate change. The ASC is made up of experts from all fields of climate change, science and economics and is currently chaired by Baroness Brown of Cambridge.

Outputs/reports

As required by this legislation, the UK Government has produced several reports, some of which are set to be updated at regular intervals. These reports include:

• Climate Change Risk Assessment (CCRA), first report published in 2012,{{cite web |access-date=2013-12-05 |access-date=2017-01-24 |access-date=2022-11-28

• National Adaptation Programme (NAP), first report published in 2013,{{cite web |access-date=2013-12-05

• Adaptation Reporting Power (ARP), first comprehensive set of reports published in 2011 (from over 100 key organisations),{{cite web |access-date=2013-12-05 |access-date=2015-10-15 |access-date=2018-08-08 |access-date=2019-09-06

The above reports and outputs were supported by the UK Climate Impacts Programme (now known as UKCIP),{{cite web |access-date=2013-12-05 |access-date=2013-12-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130923044941/http://ukclimateprojections.defra.gov.uk/ |archive-date=23 September 2013 |url-status=dead |access-date=2018-08-08

References

References

1. The citation of this Act by this [[short title]] is authorised by [https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/section/101 section 101] of this Act.
2. "Climate Change [HL] Bill – 2007–08".
3. "Climate Change Act".
4. [http://getonboard.wwf.org.uk/aboutParliamentaryBlog.php A sip of the bubbly (but hold the cigar for a couple of weeks)] {{webarchive. link. (1 January 2009 , 30 October 2008, [[WWF-UK]])
5. Sturcke, James. (15 November 2006). "Climate change bill to balance environmental and energy concerns". Guardian Unlimited.
6. "Joint Committee on the Draft Climate Change Bill – official website".
7. (24 July 2007). "Joint Committee on the Draft Climate Change Bill First Report – FORMAL MINUTES".
8. (24 July 2007). "Joint Committee on the Draft Climate Change Bill – First Report".
9. (16 May 2007). "Examination of Witnesses (Questions 32–39)".
10. (October 2007). "Taking Forward the UK Climate Change Bill: The Government Response to Pre-Legislative Scrutiny and Public Consultation – Command Paper 7225".
11. "Climate Change [HL] Bill – 2007–08".
12. (27 November 2007). "Climate Change Bill [HL] – Second Reading Debate".
13. (14 January 2008). "Climate Change Bill – Committee of Commission". [[Publicwhip]].
14. "Policy votes – Climate Change Bill". [[Publicwhip]].
15. (25 February 2008). "Climate Change Bill = Target for 2050 is 60%".
16. "Lords Hansard Text for 31 March 2008". Parliament.
17. [[Charles Moore, Baron Moore of Etchingham. Charles Moore]], "To win the battle for the consumer, Cameron must cut taxes soon", ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'', 28 September 2013.
18. "House of Commons Hansard Debates for 28 October 2008". Parliament.
19. "Climate Change Bill [HL] 2007–08". Parliament.
20. [https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2019/9780111187654 The Climate Change Act 2008 (2050 Target Amendment) Order 2019], [[legislation.gov.uk]], accessed 1 February 2025
21. "Can I have the Bill please?". Conservative Party.
22. (13 March 2007). "Ministers to unveil climate change bill". Independent Online Edition.
23. (13 March 2007). "Key elements missing from draft Climate Change Bill". Conservative Party.
24. (13 March 2007). "Chris Huhne: We must monitor carbon targets annually". Independent Online Edition.
25. (13 March 2007). "'Binding' carbon targets proposed". [[BBC]].
26. (26 January 2006). "SNP joins cross-party force on Climate Change". [[Scottish National Party]].
27. (12 October 2006). "UK planning law on climate change". [[BBC]].
28. (13 March 2007). "Draft climate bill published". Friends of the Earth.
29. (4 June 2008). "Climate Change Bill – What needs strengthening". WWF-UK.
30. "Joint Public Issues Team of the churches: briefing on the Climate Change Bill (December 2007)".
31. "Climate change: second national adaptation programme (2018 to 2023)".
32. Gardiner, A., [https://www.theccc.org.uk/2022/10/04/deepening-our-understanding-of-summertime-overheating-in-homes/ Deepening our understanding of summertime overheating in homes]
33. "Understanding climate adaptation and the third National Adaptation Programme (NAP3)".