Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
geography/russia

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Chuvash people

Turkic ethnic group

Chuvash people

Summary

Turkic ethnic group

FieldValue
groupChuvash
native_nameчӑвашсем
çăvaşsem
imageOld Chuvash men.jpg
captionOld Chuvash men, the beginning of 20th century
total
region1Russia
(Chuvashia)
pop11,067,139
684,930
ref1
region2Kazakhstan
pop222,305
ref2
region3Ukraine
pop310,593
ref3
region4Uzbekistan
pop410,074
ref4
region5Tajikistan
pop53,904
ref5
region6Turkmenistan
pop62,281
ref6
region7Belarus
pop72,242
ref7
region8Moldova
pop81,204
ref8
languagesChuvash
Russian
religionsMajority:
Orthodox Christianity
Minority:
Vattisen Yaly (ethnic religion)
Sunni Islam
relatedVolga Tatars, Mari

çăvaşsem (Chuvashia) 684,930 Russian Orthodox Christianity Minority: Vattisen Yaly (ethnic religion) Sunni Islam

The Chuvash people, also called Chuvash Tatars, are a Turkic ethnic group, a branch of the Oğurs, inhabiting an area stretching from the Idel-Ural region to Siberia.

Most of them live in the Russian republic of Chuvashia and the surrounding area, although Chuvash communities may be found throughout Russia as well as in Central Asia. They speak Chuvash, a Turkic language that diverged from other languages in the family more than a millennium ago. Among the Chuvash believers, the majority are Eastern Orthodox Christians although a minority follow Vattisen Yaly or Sunni Islam.

Etymology

Chuvash women in workaday costumes

There is no universally accepted etymology of the word Chuvash, but there are two theories. One theory suggests that the word Chuvash may be derived from Common Turkic jăvaş ('friendly', 'peaceful'), as opposed to şarmăs ('warlike').

Another theory is that the word is derived from the Tabghach, an early medieval Xianbei clan and founders of the Northern Wei dynasty in China. The Old Turkic name Tabghach (Tuoba in Mandarin) was used by some Inner Asian peoples to refer to China long after this dynasty. Gerard Clauson has shown that through regular sound changes, the clan name Tabghach may have transformed to the ethnonym Chuvash.

Language

Main article: Chuvash language

Chuvash is a Turkic language spoken in European Russia, primarily in the Chuvash Republic and adjacent areas. It is the only surviving member of the Oghur branch of Turkic languages, one of the two principal branches of the Turkic family.

Although there is no direct evidence, some scholars believe that Chuvash may be descendant from a dialect of Volga Bulgar language while others support the idea that Chuvash is another distinct Oghur Turkic language. Since the surviving literary records for the non-Chuvash members of Oghuric (Bulgar and possibly Khazar) are scant, the exact position of Chuvash within the Oghuric family cannot be determined.

Some scholars suggest Hunnish had strong ties with Bulgar and to modern Chuvash and refer to this extended grouping as separate Hunno-Bulgar languages. However, such speculations are not based on proper linguistic evidence, since the language of the Huns is almost unknown except for a few attested words and personal names. Scholars generally consider Hunnish as unclassifiable.

Chuvash woman in traditional attire

Despite grammatical similarity with the rest of Turkic language family, the presence of changes in Chuvash pronunciation (which are hard to reconcile with other members of the Turkic family) has led some scholars to see Chuvash as originating not from Proto-Turkic, but from another proto-language spoken at the time of Proto-Turkic (in which case Chuvash and all the remaining Turkic languages would be part of a larger language family).

The Oghuric branch is distinguished from the rest of the Turkic family (the Common Turkic languages) by two sound changes: r corresponding to Common Turkic z and l corresponding to Common Turkic š. The first scientific fieldwork description of Chuvash, by August Ahlqvist in 1856, allowed researchers to establish its proper affiliation.

Chuvash is so divergent from the main body of Turkic languages that Chuvash was first believed to be a Turkified Finno-Ugric language, or an intermediate branch between Turkic and Mongolic languages. Russian language and neighboring Mari and Volga Tatar heavily influenced the Chuvash language.

Mongolian, Arabic and Persian also influenced Chuvash. Chuvash language has two to three dialects. Although Chuvash is taught at schools and sometimes used in the media, it is considered endangered by the UNESCO, since Russian dominates in most spheres of life and few children learning the language are likely to become active users.

The subdivision of the Chuvash people are as below:

  • Virjal (вирьял, тури, 'upper')
  • Anat jenchi (анат енчи, 'mid-lower')
  • Anatri (анатри, 'lower')
  • Hirti (хирти, 'steppe') (this is a sub-group that is recognized by some researchers)

History

Main article: History of Chuvashia

Origins

There are two rival schools of thought on the origin of the Chuvash people. One is that they originated from a mixing between the Sabir tribes and the Finno-Ugrians. The other is that they have descendant from Volga Bulgars. Throughout history, they have experienced significant infusion and influence, not only from Russian and other Turkic peoples but also from neighboring Uralic tribes with whom they were persistently and mistakenly identified for centuries.

The Sabirs who believed to have come from Siberia, they lived there at least the end of the third millennium BC. They were skilled in warfare, used siege machinery, had a large army (including women) and were boatbuilders. Sabirs led incursions into Transcaucasia in the late-400s/early-500s, but quickly began serving as soldiers and mercenaries during the Byzantine–Sasanian Wars on both sides. Their alliance with the Byzantines laid the basis for the later Khazar-Byzantine alliance.

Early history

Chuvash girls in traditional costumes

In the early first century AD, the Bulgars whom may related to Chuvash started moving west through Zhetysu and the steppes of modern-day Kazakhstan, reaching the North Caucasus in the 2nd to 3rd centuries AD. There they established several states (Old Bulgaria on the Black Sea coast and the Suar Duchy in modern-day Dagestan). Old Bulgaria broke up in the second half of the 7th century after a series of successful Khazar invasions. Sabirs who were a tribe within the Khazar Khanate, subsequently undertook a migration to the Volga-Kama region along with other Oghuric tribes, ultimately founded the Volga Bulgaria, which eventually became extremely wealthy: its capital then being the 4th-largest city in the world.

Shortly after that, another state founded by Sabirs in Caucasus known as Suar Principality was forced to become a vassal state of Khazaria. About half a century later, the Suars took part in the Arab–Khazar wars of 732–737. The adoption of Islam in the early tenth century in Volga Bulgaria led to most of its people embracing that religion.

After the Mongols destroyed Volga Bulgaria in 1236, the Golden Horde kept control of the region until its slow dissolution from 1438. The Kazan Khanate then became the new authority of the region and of the Chuvash. The modern name "Chuvash" began to appear in records starting from the sixteenth century from Russian and other foreign sources.

In 1552, the Russians conquered the Kazan Khanate and its territories. The Chuvash, required to pay yasak, gradually became dispossessed of much of their land. Many Chuvash who traditionally engaged in agriculture were forced to become bonded laborers in the timber industry or to work in barges due to growing poverty. The subsequent centuries saw the Christianization and Russification of the Chuvash. During this period, most Chuvash converted to Orthodox Christianity, but the Tsars never achieved their complete Russification.

After conversion, Russian historian Vasily Nikitich Tatishchev visited the lands of Volga Bulgaria and wrote that Bulgars also migrated to Bashkortostan and North of Kazan (i.e. modern-day Chuvashia).

Modern history

Chuvash diaspora in [[Volga Federal District

The 18th and 19th centuries saw the revival of Chuvash culture and the publication of many educational, literary, and linguistic works, along with the establishment of schools and other programs. The Chuvash language began to be used in local schools, and a special written script for the Chuvash language was created in 1871.

On 24 June 1920, the Bolshevik government of the RSFSR established the Chuvash Autonomous Region; it became the Chuvash Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic on 21 April 1925. Around this time Chuvash nationalism grew, but the Soviet authorities attempted to suppress nationalist movements by re-drawing the borders of the republic, leaving many Chuvash living in neighboring republics or in Russian districts. During most of the Soviet period of 1917–1991, the Chuvash were subjected to Russification campaigns.

The Chuvash language vanished from educational and public use. In 1989, another Chuvash cultural revival began - partly in response to these changes. Soon the Chuvash language once again came into use in educational, public, and political life. , schools in the Chuvash Republic and in areas outside that have large Chuvash populations teach the Chuvash language and culture. Chuvash people around Russia also have media available to them in their local communities.

Genetics

bibcode=2015PLoSO..1035820K }}</ref>

Physical anthropologists using the racial frameworks of the early 20th century saw the Chuvash as a mixed Finno-Ugric and Turkic people. An autosomal analysis (2015) detected an indication of Oghur and possibly Bulgar ancestry in modern Chuvash. These Oghur tribes brought the Chuvash language with them. Another study found some Finno-Ugric components in Chuvash people.

Phenotypically, there is no particular differences among the Chuvash, as more Caucasoid or more Mongoloid phenotypes can be found among all subgroups. In 2017, a full genome study found Chuvash largely show a Finno-Ugric genetic component despite having a small common Turkic component with Bashkir and Tatar peoples. This study supported language shift hypothesis among Chuvash population.

Culture

They speak the Chuvash language and have some pre-Christian traditions. The Chuvash have specific patterns used in embroidery, which is found in their traditional clothing. Many people also use the Russian and Tatar languages, spoken in Chuvashia and nearby regions along the middle course of the Volga River, in the central part of European Russia.

Religion

Baptized Chuvash people, 1870

Most Chuvash people are Eastern Orthodox Christians and belong to the Russian Orthodox Church while a minority are Sunni Muslims or practitioners of Vattisen Yaly. After the Russian subjugation of the Chuvash in the 16th century, a campaign of Christianization began. However, most Chuvash were not converted until the mid-19th century. The Chuvash retain some pre-Christian and pre-Islamic shamanism traditions in their cultural activities. Parallel pray in the shrines called cv and sacrifice geese there. One of the main shrines is located in the town of Bilyarsk. Vattisen Yaly is a contemporary revival of the ethnic religion of the Chuvash people.

A minority of Chuvash may have been exposed to Islam as early as the Volga Bulgaria era but most of those early Chuvash likely converted during the Golden Horde period. An inscription dated at 1307 indicates that some Chuvash were converted to Islam, and religious terms occur in Chuvash in the form of Tatar loanwords. However, sources do not specify the practices of the Chuvash during this period. Some Chuvash who converted to Christianity following the Russian conquest converted to Islam during the 19th and early 20th century. During this period, several Chuvash communities were influenced by Tatars and became Muslim. This caused some Muslim Chuvash to define themselves as Tatars but they retained their language and several Chuvash customs.

Notes

References

References

  1. [http://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Tom5_tab1_VPN-2020.xlsx Ethnic groups of Russia in the 2021 census]. {{in lang. ru
  2. (2013-03-21). "Демоскоп Weekly - Приложение. Справочник статистических показателей".
  3. "Всеукраїнський перепис населення 2001 - English version - Results - Nationality and citizenship - The distribution of the population by nationality and mother tongue - Selection".
  4. [http://ula.uzsci.net/portal/library/atlas/ethnic_minorities.pdf]{{dead link. (May 2016)
  5. "Chuvash". Ethnologue.
  6. (2013-03-21). "Демоскоп Weekly - Приложение. Справочник статистических показателей".
  7. "НАЦИОНАЛЬНЫЙ СОСТАВ НАСЕЛЕНИЯ РЕСПУБЛИКИ БЕЛАРУСЬ (ETHNIC COMPOSITION OF POPULATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS)".
  8. (2013-03-21). "Демоскоп Weekly - Приложение. Справочник статистических показателей".
  9. (2021-10-08). "Татары и чуваши ветви одного древа".
  10. "Chuvash". [[Oxford University Press]].
  11. "Chuvash". [[Oxford University Press]].
  12. Gerard Clauson, ''Studies in Turkic and Mongolic Linguistics''. Routledge, 2002, p. 23.
  13. Clauson, Gerard. (2002). "Studies in Turkic and Mongolic linguistics". Taylor & Francis.
  14. Price, Glanville. (2000). "Encyclopedia of the languages of Europe". Wiley-Blackwell.
  15. Agyagási, K.. (2020). "A Volga Bulgarian Classifier: A Historical and Areal Linguistic Study". University of Debrecen.
  16. (2021). "The Turkic Languages". Routledge.
  17. Pritsak, Omeljan. (1982). "The Hunnic Language of the Attila Clan". [[Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute]].
  18. Ramer, Alexis Manaster. "Proto-Bulgarian/Danube Bulgar/Hunno-Bulgar Bekven".
  19. (1982). "The Hunnic Language of the Attila Clan". Harvard Ukrainian Studies.
  20. Savelyev, Alexander. (27 May 2020). "Chuvash and the Bulgharic Languages". Oxford University Press.
  21. Golden, Peter B.. (1992). "An introduction to the history of the Turkic peoples: ethnogenesis and state-formation in medieval and early modern Eurasia and the Middle East". O. Harrassowitz.
  22. RÓNA-TAS, ANDRÁS. (1999-03-01). "Hungarians and Europe in the Early Middle Ages". Central European University Press.
  23. Sinor, Denis. (1997). "Studies in medieval inner Asia". Ashgate.
  24. "Encyclopedia of Linguistics".
  25. Johanson (1998); cf. Johanson (2000, 2007) and the articles pertaining to the subject in Johanson & Csató (ed., 1998).
  26. Korhonen, Mikko. (1986). "Finno-Ugrian Language Studies in Finland 1828-1918". Societas Scientiarum Fennica.
  27. Savelyev, Alexander. (June 2020). "The Oxford Guide to the Transeurasian Languages".
  28. "Chuvash language {{!}} Alphabet, People, & Meaning {{!}} Britannica".
  29. (2021). "The Turkic Languages". Routledge.
  30. (24 June 2015). "Negation in Uralic Languages". John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  31. "Chuvash".
  32. Poppe, Nicholas. (1977). "On Chuvash-Mongolian Linguistic Contacts". Journal of the American Oriental Society.
  33. (2005). "Encyclopedia of the world's minorities". Routledge.
  34. Savelyev, Alexander. (2020-06-30). "The Oxford Guide to the Transeurasian Languages".
  35. "Zheltov, Pavel. An Attribute-Sample Database System for Describing Chuvash Affixes".
  36. Tapani Salminen. (22 September 1999). "UNESCO red book on endangered languages: Europe".
  37. "Chuvash origins: Evidence from mtDNA Markers. (2010)".
  38. Krueger, John R.. (1961). "Chuvash Manual. Introduction, Grammar, Reader, and Vocabulary".
  39. Sinor, Denis. (March 1990). "The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia". Cambridge University Press.
  40. Golden, Peter B.. "An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples".
  41. Golden, Peter B.. "Studies on the Peoples and Cultures of the Eurasian Steppes".
  42. Golden, Peter B.. "Studies on the Peoples and Cultures of the Eurasian Steppes".
  43. Golden, Peter B.. "Studies on the Peoples and Cultures of the Eurasian Steppes".
  44. Golden, Peter B.. "Khazar Studies".
  45. (2005). "Encyclopedia of the World's Minorities". Routledge.
  46. (2005). "Encyclopedia of the World's Minorities". Routledge.
  47. Akiner, Shirin. (1986). "Islamic Peoples Of The Soviet Union (With an Appendix on the non-Muslim Turkic peoples of the Soviet Union". Routledge.
  48. Tatishchev, Vasily Nikitich. (1768). "История Российская. Часть 1".
  49. (2005). "Encyclopedia of the World's Minorities". Routledge.
  50. (2015). "Genetic Heritage of the Balto-Slavic Speaking Populations: A Synthesis of Autosomal, Mitochondrial and Y-Chromosomal Data". PLOS ONE.
  51. {{cite EB1911
  52. (21 April 2015). "The Genetic Legacy of the Expansion of Turkic-Speaking Nomads across Eurasia". PLOS Genet.
  53. (1 October 2012). "HLA gene and haplotype frequencies in Russians, Bashkirs and Tatars, living in the Chelyabinsk Region (Russian South Urals)". International Journal of Immunogenetics.
  54. http://xn--c1acc6aafa1c.xn--p1ai/?question=chuvashi-kto-oni-na-samom-dele Chuvash people — who are they really
  55. [http://xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/su/node/935 Anthropological material about the origin of Chuvash people]
  56. (2017-12-28). "Between Lake Baikal and the Baltic Sea: genomic history of the gateway to Europe". BMC Genetics.
  57. (December 2023). "Неведомый, чудный узор".
  58. Cole, Jeffrey. (2011). "Ethnic Groups of Europe: An Encyclopedia". ABC-CLIO.
  59. "Chuvash {{!}} Encyclopedia.com".
  60. (2020-06-01). "Chuvash 'Paganism' at the Turn of the 21st Century: Traditional Rituals in the Religious Practice of Volga–Urals Chuvash Groups". Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics.
  61. Arik, Durmuş. (2007-04-01). "Islam among the Chuvashes and its Role in the Change of Chuvash Ethnicity". Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs.
Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Chuvash people — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report