From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Carolina Challenge Cup
Pre-season soccer tournament in the U.S.
Pre-season soccer tournament in the U.S.
| Field | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| name | Carolina Challenge Cup | |
| image | [[File:Carolina Challenge Cup.png | 200px]] |
| organiser | Charleston Battery | |
| founded | ||
| region | United States | |
| number of teams | 4 | |
| current champions | Inter Miami CF | |
| (1st title) | ||
| most successful club | D.C. United | |
| Columbus Crew | ||
| (4 titles each) | ||
| website | ||
| current | 2022 | |
| American | yes |
(1st title) Columbus Crew (4 titles each) The Carolina Challenge Cup, officially the Breeze Airways™ Carolina Challenge Cup for sponsorship reasons, is a four-team round robin pre-season competition hosted by the Charleston Battery. It was started in 2004 and features teams from Major League Soccer and the United Soccer Leagues. The Columbus Crew edged out D.C. United on goal differential to win the 2004 competition, while the San Jose Earthquakes won the 2005 competition. San Jose's second iteration (although a separate team), the Houston Dynamo, won the 2006 and 2007 versions. The San Jose Earthquakes again won the tournament on their return to the MLS in 2008 while Real Salt Lake claimed the title in their debut in 2009.
Over the first few years of the tournament, the champion had gone on to win one of the two year-end MLS trophies, the Supporters' Shield or MLS Cup. This streak ended in 2008 as San Jose Earthquakes failed to make the playoffs, consequently missing out on both titles. Between 2008 and 2010 it either predicted the MLS Cup winner or the team with the worst record in the league. San Jose and D.C United had the worst records in 2008 and 2010 respectively, while Real Salt Lake won the 2009 MLS Cup.
Format
The tournament has always featured four clubs in a round-robin format, with each club playing three games over the span of a week.
History
The cup competition was established in 2004 by the Charleston Battery, who invited teams from Major League Soccer to participate. It was the first competition hosted by a lower-league team to feature MLS teams during their preseason.
The cup was not held in 2016, instead opting to hold individual friendly matches with Saint Louis FC, Wilmington Hammerheads and the New York Cosmos. The Carolina Challenge Cup was played again from 2017 to 2019, and resumed again in 2022 following a two-year hiatus. Breeze Airways was announced as the cup's title sponsor on January 13, 2022, in an official club statement.
Coffee Pot Cup
A highlight of the competitions that have been held so far is the Coffee Pot Cup, a game between D.C. United and the host Charleston Battery, making it a rare example of an MLS-USL team rivalry. The history behind this comes from a postgame incident after the Third Round of the 1999 U.S. Open Cup, where Charleston pulled a shocking 4-3 extra time upset at home over D.C. A news report from then:
"D.C. United apparently used the visitors' locker room to vent its frustration over losing to the Charleston Battery in last Wednesday's US Open Cup match at Blackbaud Stadium here. Members of the Major League Soccer team smashed two coffee pots and pulled off some showerheads, according to Battery officials. 'I think a bill will be sent to them,' Battery general manager Buckley Andrews said earlier this week. The US Soccer Federation website's match report on Charleston's 4-3 overtime win over the two-time MLS champion called it 'one of the biggest upsets ever seen in American soccer history ... It will surely go down as an Open Cup classic.'"
After a few years, supporters of both sides in the name of spirited competition decided to have an actual Coffee Pot played for between the sides as a friendly wager. The winner has the other team's supporters fill the Cup with beer for the winning team's supporters to enjoy. Supporters of both sides say that whenever the two sides play, they are playing for the Coffee Pot Cup (the two sides could meet in the U.S. Open Cup if drawn together, or in an arranged friendly). The inaugural winners of the Cup in 2004 were D.C. United after winning 2–1. In 2005 and 2006, the two teams played to a tie (2-2, 1-1), meaning no one had to pay for the beer to fill the Cup, but D.C. maintained possession.
Mainly due to their commitment to play in the CONCACAF Champions League, D.C. United were unable to play in the 2007 and 2008 versions of the tournament.
In 2008, the teams competed in the final of the Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup, as D.C. United defeated Charleston 2–1 on September 3, 2008, at RFK Stadium.
- 2004, Carolina Challenge Cup: D.C. United 2, Charleston Battery 1
- 2005, Carolina Challenge Cup: D.C. United 2, Charleston Battery 2
- 2006, Carolina Challenge Cup: D.C. United 1, Charleston Battery 1
- 2006, Cary, NC Friendly: D.C. United 2, Charleston Battery 0
- 2008, US Open Cup: D.C. United 2, Charleston Battery 1
- 2009, Carolina Challenge Cup: D.C. United 2, Charleston Battery 0
- 2010, Carolina Challenge Cup: D.C. United 2, Charleston Battery 0
-
- Carolina Challenge Cup: D.C. United 2, Charleston Battery 1
-
- Carolina Challenge Cup: D.C. United 3, Charleston Battery 1
-
- Carolina Challenge Cup: D.C. United 1, Charleston Battery 1
Results
| Ed. | Year | Champion | Runner-up | 3rd Place | 4th Place |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | USA Columbus Crew | USA D.C. United | USA Charleston Battery | USA Wilmington Hammerheads | |
| 2005 | USA San Jose Earthquakes | USA D.C. United | USA Columbus Crew | USA Charleston Battery | |
| 2006 | USA Houston Dynamo | USA D.C. United | USA Charleston Battery | USA New York Red Bulls | |
| 2007 | USA Houston Dynamo | CAN Toronto FC | USA New York Red Bulls | USA Charleston Battery | |
| 2008 | USA San Jose Earthquakes | USA Charleston Battery | USA New York Red Bulls | CAN Toronto FC | |
| 2009 | USA Real Salt Lake | CAN Toronto FC | USA D.C. United | USA Charleston Battery | |
| 2010 | USA D.C. United | USA Real Salt Lake | CAN Toronto FC | USA Charleston Battery | |
| 2011 | USA D.C. United | USA Charleston Battery | USA Chicago Fire | CAN Toronto FC | |
| 2012 | USA D.C. United | USA Chicago Fire | USA Columbus Crew | USA Charleston Battery | |
| 2013 | USA Chicago Fire | CAN Vancouver Whitecaps FC | USA Charleston Battery | USA Houston Dynamo | |
| 2014 | USA D.C. United | USA Seattle Sounders FC | USA Houston Dynamo | USA Charleston Battery | |
| 2015 | USA Houston Dynamo | USA New York City FC | USA Charleston Battery | USA Orlando City SC | |
| 2016 | |||||
| 2017 | USA Columbus Crew | USA Atlanta United FC | USA Charleston Battery | USA Seattle Sounders FC | |
| 2018 | USA Columbus Crew | USA Charleston Battery | USA Atlanta United FC | USA Minnesota United FC | |
| 2019 | USA Columbus Crew | USA Chicago Fire | USA FC Cincinnati | USA Charleston Battery | |
| 2020–21 | |||||
| 2022 | USA Inter Miami CF | USA Columbus Crew | USA Charleston Battery | USA Charlotte FC |
Titles by team
References
References
- (November 16, 2011). "Carolina Challenge Cup Schedule Set". CharlestonBattery.com.
- (January 20, 2009). "DC United, Toronto FC & Real Salt Lake join Charleston Battery for 2009 Carolina Challenge Cup". CharlestonBattery.com.
- Miller, Andrew. (January 10, 2016). "Charleston Battery won't hold Carolina Challenge Cup this year". [[The Post and Courier]].
- (2025-05-06). "How a US Open Cup classic, locker room vandalism inspired fans to create Coffee Pot Cup".
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Carolina Challenge Cup — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report