From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Boundary-incompressible surface
In low-dimensional topology, a boundary-incompressible surface is a two-dimensional surface within a three-dimensional manifold whose topology cannot be made simpler by a certain type of operation known as boundary compression.
Suppose M is a 3-manifold with boundary. Suppose also that S is a compact surface with boundary that is properly embedded in M, meaning that the boundary of S is a subset of the boundary of M and the interior points of S are a subset of the interior points of M. A boundary-compressing disk for S in M is defined to be a disk D in M such that D \cap S = \alpha and D \cap \partial M = \beta are arcs in \partial D , with \alpha \cup \beta = \partial D , \alpha \cap \beta = \partial \alpha = \partial \beta , and \alpha is an essential arc in S ( \alpha does not cobound a disk in S with another arc in \partial (S ).
The surface S is said to be boundary-compressible if either S is a disk that cobounds a ball with a disk in \partial M or there exists a boundary-compressing disk for S in M. Otherwise, S is boundary-incompressible.
Alternatively, one can relax this definition by dropping the requirement that the surface be properly embedded. Suppose now that S is a compact surface (with boundary) embedded in the boundary of a 3-manifold M. Suppose further that D is a properly embedded disk in M such that D intersects S in an essential arc (one that does not cobound a disk in S with another arc in \partial S ). Then D is called a boundary-compressing disk for S in M. As above, S is said to be boundary-compressible if either S is a disk in \partial M or there exists a boundary-compressing disk for S in M. Otherwise, S is boundary-incompressible.
For instance, if K is a trefoil knot embedded in the boundary of a solid torus V and S is the closure of a small annular neighborhood of K in \partial V , then S is not properly embedded in V since the interior of S is not contained in the interior of V. However, S is embedded in \partial V and there does not exist a boundary-compressing disk for S in V, so S is boundary-incompressible by the second definition.
References
- W. Jaco, Lectures on Three-Manifold Topology, volume 43 of CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1980.
- T. Kobayashi, A construction of 3-manifolds whose homeomorphism classes of Heegaard splittings have polynomial growth, Osaka J. Math. 29 (1992), no. 4, 653–674. .
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Boundary-incompressible surface — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report