Biomass (ecology)

Ecological pyramids

Main article: Ecological pyramid

An ecological pyramid is a graphical representation that shows, for a given ecosystem, the relationship between biomass or biological productivity and trophic levels.

• A biomass pyramid shows the amount of biomass at each trophic level.
• A productivity pyramid shows the production or turn-over in biomass at each trophic level.

An ecological pyramid provides a snapshot in time of an ecological community.

The bottom of the pyramid represents the primary producers (autotrophs). The primary producers take energy from the environment in the form of sunlight or inorganic chemicals and use it to create energy-rich molecules such as carbohydrates. This mechanism is called primary production. The pyramid then proceeds through the various trophic levels to the apex predators at the top.

When energy is transferred from one trophic level to the next, typically only ten percent is used to build new biomass. The remaining ninety percent goes to metabolic processes or is dissipated as heat. This energy loss means that productivity pyramids are never inverted, and generally limits food chains to about six levels. However, in oceans, biomass pyramids can be wholly or partially inverted, with more biomass at higher levels.

Terrestrial biomass

Terrestrial biomass generally decreases markedly at each higher trophic level (plants, herbivores, carnivores). Examples of terrestrial producers are grasses, trees and shrubs. These have a much higher biomass than the animals that consume them, such as deer, zebras and insects. The level with the least biomass are the highest predators in the food chain, such as foxes and eagles.

In a temperate grassland, grasses and other plants are the primary producers at the bottom of the pyramid. Then come the primary consumers, such as grasshoppers, voles and bison, followed by the secondary consumers, shrews, hawks and small cats. Finally the tertiary consumers, large cats and wolves. The biomass pyramid decreases markedly at each higher level.

Changes in plant species in the terrestrial ecosystem can result in changes in the biomass of soil decomposer communities.{{Cite journal |last1=Spehn |first1=Eva M. |last2=Joshi |first2=Jasmin |last3=Schmid |first3=Bernhard |last4=Alphei |first4=Jörn |last5=Körner |first5=Christian |date=2000 |title= Plant diversity effects on soil heterotrophic activity in experimental grassland ecosystems |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1004891807664 |journal=Plant and Soil |volume=224 |issue=2 |pages=217–230 |doi=10.1023/A:1004891807664|bibcode=2000PlSoi.224..217S |s2cid=25639544 |url-access=subscription }} Biomass in C3 and C4 plant species can change in response to altered concentrations of CO2. C3 plant species have been observed to increase in biomass in response to increasing concentrations of CO2 of up to 900 ppm.

Ocean biomass

Ocean or marine biomass, in a reversal of terrestrial biomass, can increase at higher trophic levels. In the ocean, the food chain typically starts with phytoplankton, and follows the course:

Phytoplankton are the main primary producers at the bottom of the marine food chain. Phytoplankton use photosynthesis to convert inorganic carbon into protoplasm. They are then consumed by zooplankton that range in size from a few micrometers in diameter in the case of protistan microzooplankton to macroscopic gelatinous and crustacean zooplankton.

Zooplankton comprise the second level in the food chain, and includes small crustaceans, such as copepods and krill, and the larva of fish, squid, lobsters and crabs.

In turn, small zooplankton are consumed by both larger predatory zooplankters, such as krill, and by forage fish, which are small, schooling, filter-feeding fish. This makes up the third level in the food chain.

A fourth trophic level can consist of predatory fish, marine mammals and seabirds that consume forage fish. Examples are swordfish, seals and gannets.

Apex predators, such as orcas, which can consume seals, and shortfin mako sharks, which can consume swordfish, make up a fifth trophic level. Baleen whales can consume zooplankton and krill directly, leading to a food chain with only three or four trophic levels.

Marine environments can have inverted biomass pyramids. In particular, the biomass of consumers (copepods, krill, shrimp, forage fish) is larger than the biomass of primary producers. This happens because the ocean's primary producers are tiny phytoplankton which are r-strategists that grow and reproduce rapidly, so a small mass can have a fast rate of primary production. In contrast, terrestrial primary producers, such as forests, are K-strategists that grow and reproduce slowly, so a much larger mass is needed to achieve the same rate of primary production.

Among the phytoplankton at the base of the marine food web are members from a phylum of bacteria called cyanobacteria. Marine cyanobacteria include the smallest known photosynthetic organisms. The smallest of all, Prochlorococcus, is approximately 0.5 to 0.8 micrometres across. In terms of individual numbers, Prochlorococcus is possibly the most plentiful species on Earth: a single millilitre of surface seawater can contain 100,000 cells or more. Worldwide, there are estimated to be several octillion (1027) individuals. Prochlorococcus is ubiquitous between 40°N and 40°S and dominates in the oligotrophic (nutrient poor) regions of the oceans. The bacterium accounts for an estimated 20% of the oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere, and forms part of the base of the ocean food chain.

Bacterial biomass

Bacteria and archaea are both classified as prokaryotes, and their biomass is commonly estimated together. The global biomass of prokaryotes is estimated at 30 billion tonnes C, dominated by bacteria.

The estimates for the global biomass of prokaryotes had changed significantly over recent decades, as more data became available. A much-cited study from 1998 collected data on abundances (number of cells) of bacteria and archaea in different natural environments, and estimated their total biomass at 350 to 550 billion tonnes C. This vast amount is similar to the biomass of carbon in all plants. The vast majority of bacteria and archaea were estimated to be in sediments deep below the seafloor or in the deep terrestrial biosphere (in deep continental aquifers). However, updated measurements reported in a 2012 study reduced the calculated prokaryotic biomass in deep subseafloor sediments from the original ≈300 billion tonnes C to ≈4 billion tonnes C (range 1.5–22 billion tonnes). This update originates from much lower estimates of both the prokaryotic abundance and their average weight.

A census published in PNAS in May 2018 estimated global bacterial biomass at ≈70 billion tonnes C, of which ≈60 billion tonnes are in the terrestrial deep subsurface. It also estimated the global biomass of archaea at ≈7 billion tonnes C. A later study by the Deep Carbon Observatory published in 2018 reported a much larger dataset of measurements, and updated the total biomass estimate in the deep terrestrial biosphere. It used this new knowledge and previous estimates to update the global biomass of bacteria and archaea to 23–31 billion tonnes C. Roughly 70% of the global biomass was estimated to be found in the deep subsurface. The estimated number of prokaryotic cells globally was estimated to be 11–15 × 1029. With this information, the authors of the May 2018 PNAS article revised their estimate for the global biomass of prokaryotes to ≈30 billion tonnes C, similar to the Deep Carbon Observatory estimate.

These estimates convert global abundance of prokaryotes into global biomass using average cellular biomass figures that are based on limited data. Recent estimates used an average cellular biomass of about 20–30 femtogram carbon (fgC) per cell in the subsurface and terrestrial habitats.

Global biomass

The total global biomass has been estimated at 550 billion tonnes C. A breakdown of the global biomass is given by kingdom in the table below, based on a 2018 study by Bar-On et. al.

Land animals account for about 500 million tonnes C, or about 20% of the biomass of animals on Earth. Terrestrial arthropods account for about 150 million tonnes C, most of which is found in the topsoil. Land mammals account for about 180 million tonnes C, most of which are humans (about 80 million tonnes C) and domesticated mammals (about 90 million tonnes C). Wild terrestrial mammals account for only about 3 million tonnes C, less than 2% of the total mammalian biomass on land.[[File:Distribution of the global biomass.png|thumb|center|700px|The global biomass broken down by kingdom and into taxonomic groups for animals. The estimates for bacteria and archaea have been updated to 30 billion tonnes C combined since this figure was made.]] Most of the global biomass is found on land, with only 5 to 10 billion tonnes C found in the oceans. On land, there is about 1,000 times more plant biomass (phytomass) than animal biomass (zoomass). About 18% of this plant biomass is eaten by the land animals. However, marine animals eat most of the marine autotrophs, and the biomass of marine animals is greater than that of marine autotrophs.

According to a 2020 study published in Nature, human-made materials, or technomass, outweigh all living biomass on earth, with plastic alone exceeding the mass of all land and marine animals combined.

Global rate of production

Net primary production is the rate at which new biomass is generated, mainly due to photosynthesis. Global primary production can be estimated from satellite observations. Satellites scan the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) over terrestrial habitats and scan sea-surface chlorophyll levels over oceans. This results in 56.4 billion tonnes C/yr (53.8%) for terrestrial primary production and 48.5 billion tonnes C/yr for oceanic primary production. Thus, the total photoautotrophic primary production for the Earth is about 104.9 billion tonnes C/yr. This translates to about 426 gC/m2/yr for land production (excluding areas with permanent ice cover) and 140 gC/m2/yr for the oceans.

However, there is a much more significant difference in standing stocks—while accounting for almost half of the total annual production, oceanic autotrophs account for only about 0.2% of the total biomass.

Terrestrial freshwater ecosystems generate about 1.5% of the global net primary production.

Some global producers of biomass, in order of productivity rates, are

References

References

1. "biomass".
2. (June 2018). "The biomass distribution on Earth". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
3. (June 1998). "Prokaryotes: the unseen majority". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
4. (October 2012). "Global distribution of microbial abundance and biomass in subseafloor sediment". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
5. Deep Carbon Observatory. (10 December 2018). "Life in deep Earth totals 15 to 23 billion tons of carbon – hundreds of times more than humans – Deep Carbon Observatory collaborators, exploring the 'Galapagos of the deep,' add to what's known, unknown, and unknowable about Earth's most pristine ecosystem". [[EurekAlert!]].
6. Dockrill, Peter. (11 December 2018). "Scientists Reveal a Massive Biosphere of Life Hidden Under Earth's Surface". Science Alert.
7. Gabbatiss, Josh. (11 December 2018). "Massive 'deep life' study reveals billions of tonnes of microbes living far beneath Earth's surface". [[The Independent]].
8. (June 2015). "An Estimate of the Total DNA in the Biosphere". PLOS Biology.
9. Nuwer, Rachel. (18 July 2015). "Counting All the DNA on Earth". The New York Times.
10. (2020). "Global human-made mass exceeds all living biomass". [[Nature (journal).
11. (2002). "Interactive Effects of Diversity, Nutrients and Elevated CO2 on Experimental Plant Communities". Oikos.
12. (2020-03-12). "Soybean photosynthetic and biomass responses to carbon dioxide concentrations ranging from pre-industrial to the distant future". Oxford University Press (OUP).
13. (December 2007). "Patterns and implications of gene gain and loss in the evolution of Prochlorococcus". PLOS Genetics.
14. (27 September 2006). "Earth from Saturn".
15. (March 1999). "Prochlorococcus, a marine photosynthetic prokaryote of global significance". Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.
16. (12 June 2008). "The Most Important Microbe You've Never Heard Of".
17. (24 September 2018). "The biomass and biodiversity of the continental subsurface". Nature Geoscience.
18. Observatory, Deep Carbon. "Life in deep Earth totals 15 to 23 billion tons of carbon—hundreds of times more than humans".
19. (21 February 2019). "Towards a quantitative view of the global ubiquity of biofilms". Nature Reviews Microbiology.
20. (2002-06-26). "Distribution patterns of attached and suspended bacteria in pristine and contaminated shallow aquifers studied with an in situ sediment exposure microcosm". Aquatic Microbial Ecology.
21. Groombridge B, Jenkins MD (2000) [https://books.google.com/books?id=_kHeAXV5-XwC ''Global biodiversity: Earth's living resources in the 21st century''] p. 11. [[World Conservation Monitoring Centre]], World Conservation Press, Cambridge
22. (2021-03-19). "The rise to dominance of lanternfishes (Teleostei: Myctophidae) in the oceanic ecosystems: a paleontological perspective". Paleobiology.
23. (2021-11-12). "The global ocean size spectrum from bacteria to whales". Science Advances.
24. (20 August 2021). "Misc All the Biomass of Earth, in One Graphic". Visual Capitalist.
25. [[Sue Hartley. Hartley, Sue]] (2010) [http://vega.org.uk/video/programme/323 The 300 Million Years War: Plant Biomass v Herbivores] {{Webarchive. link. (1 December 2010 ''[[Royal Institution Christmas Lectures). Royal Institution Christmas Lecture]]''.
26. Laville, Sandra. (December 9, 2020). "Human-made materials now outweigh Earth's entire biomass – study". The Guardian.
27. "Anthropogenic mass: Comparing human-made mass to the living Biomass on earth".
28. Nations, United. "Day of 8 Billion".
29. Hern, Warren M.. (September 1999). "How Many Times Has the Human Population Doubled? Comparisons with Cancer". Population and Environment.
30. (February 2010). "Water as an essential nutrient: the physiological basis of hydration". European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
31. (2023-03-07). "The global biomass of wild mammals". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
32. (June 2012). "The weight of nations: an estimation of adult human biomass". BMC Public Health.
33. "FAOSTAT".
34. IPCC 2006, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Eggleston H.S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T. and Tanabe K. (eds). Published: IGES, Japan.
35. (September 19, 2022). "The abundance, biomass, and distribution of ants on Earth". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
36. (3 Feb 2023). "The global biomass and number of terrestrial arthropods". Science Advances.
37. (December 1982). "A Comparative Analysis of Soil Fauna Populations and Their Role in Decomposition Processes". Oikos.
38. (2016). "Global soil biodiversity atlas". Publications Office of the European Union.
39. (October 13, 2009). "Global patterns in belowground communities". Ecology Letters.
40. (2022). "Biology and Ecology of Earthworms". Springer.
41. (25 Dec 2019). "Ant-termite interactions: an important but under-explored ecological linkage". Biological Reviews.
42. Sum of [(biomass m{{sup. −22)*(area m{{sup. 2)] from table 3 in Sanderson, M.G. 1996 ''Biomass of termites and their emissions of methane and carbon dioxide: A global database'' Global Biochemical Cycles, Vol '''10:4''' 543–557
43. (8 August 2019). "Soil nematode abundance and functional group composition at a global scale". Nature.
44. (August 2010). "The impact of whaling on the ocean carbon cycle: why bigger was better". PLOS ONE.
45. (1996). "Whaling and Deep-Sea Biodiversity". Conservation Biology.
46. Fisheries, NOAA. (2022-05-03). "Fun Facts About Fascinating Fish {{!}} NOAA Fisheries".
47. (2017). "Energy Density and Dry Matter Content in Fish: New Observations and an Evaluation of Some Empirical Models". Transactions of the American Fisheries Society.
48. (2009). "A re-appraisal of the total biomass and annual production of Antarctic krill". Deep-Sea Research Part I.
49. (2003). "Estimates of global cyanobacterial biomass and its distribution". Algological Studies.
50. (July 1998). "Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components". Science.
51. Alexander, David E.. (1999). "Encyclopedia of Environmental Science". [[Springer Science+Business Media.
52. (2000). "Ecology". Macmillan.
53. "What are wetlands?".
54. (2000). "Ecology". Macmillan.
55. Mark Spalding, Corinna Ravilious, and Edmund Green. 2001. ''World Atlas of Coral Reefs''. Berkeley, California: University of California Press and UNEP/WCMC.
56. Park, Chris C.. (2001). "The environment: principles and applications". Routledge.
57. "Tundra – Biomes – WWF".
58. (2020-01-17). "Tundra".