Ballot

Etymology

The word ballot comes from Italian ballotta, meaning a "small ball used in voting" or a "secret vote taken by ballots" in Venice, Italy.

History

In ancient Greece, citizens used pieces of broken pottery to scratch in the name of the target of the ostracism.

The first use of paper ballots to conduct an election appears to have been in Rome in 139 BC, following the introduction of the lex Gabinia tabellaria.

In ancient India, around 920 AD, in Tamil Nadu, palm leaves were used for village assembly elections. The palm leaves with candidate names were put inside a mud pot for counting. This was called Kudavolai system.

The first use of paper ballots in America was in 1629 within the Massachusetts Bay Colony to select a pastor for the Salem Church. Paper ballots were pieces of paper marked and supplied by voters.

Before the introduction of the secret ballot, American political parties distributed ballots listing their own candidates for party supporters to deposit in ballot boxes.

File:0 - Stoà of Attalus Museum - Ostraka for ostracism - Photo by Giovanni Dall'Orto, Nov 9 2009.jpg|Ancient Greek ostraca, 5th century BC, Ancient Agora Museum in Athens, housed in the Stoa of Attalus File:Athenian Secret Ballot.jpg|Ancient Greek bronze secret ballots used to cast a juror's vote on a case, 3rd century BC, Ancient Agora Museum in Athens, housed in the Stoa of Attalus File:National Union Ticket- Lincoln & Johnson (4360135844).jpg|1864 ballot of the National Union Party (United States)

Types of voting systems

Depending on the type of voting system used in the election, different ballots may be used. Ranked ballots allow voters to rank candidates in order of preference, while ballots for first-past-the-post systems only allow voters to select one candidate for each position. In party-list systems, lists may be open or closed. File:Bundestagswahl 2021 Wahlkreis 249 Stimmzettel.jpg|Ballot from the 2021 German federal election, using mixed-member proportional representation. Voters choose a candidate (left, in black) and a party (right, in blue). File:Nationalratswahl in Österreich 2017 - Wahlzettel 01.jpg|Ballot from the 2017 legislative election in Austria, using party list proportional representation. Voters choose one party, after which they may choose a preferred candidate within that party, in the lower section. File:Ballot paper for the 2021 United Kingdom local elections (Coventry, Westwood ward).jpg|Ballot from a 2021 local election in the United Kingdom, using first-past-the-post. Voters choose one candidate. File:South Australian Legislative Council Ballot Paper.png|Example ballot from a South Australian Legislative Council election using the single transferable vote, common in Australian upper houses. Voters rank candidates using numerals in one of two mutually exclusive ways: Above the line: mark “1” next to a party or group (additional preferences optional); or Below the line: number at least 1 to 12 next to individual candidates File:Voting officers visit to collect ballot papers from home- 02.jpg|Voting officers visit to collect ballot papers from home

Design

Ballot design can aid or inhibit clarity in an election. Poor designs lead to confusion and potentially chaos if large numbers of voters spoil or mismark a ballot. The "butterfly ballot" used in the Palm Beach County, Florida 2000 U.S. presidential election (a ballot paper that has names down both sides, with a single column of punch holes in the center, which has been likened to a maze{{Cite news | access-date = 2014-10-26 | archive-date = 2014-09-05 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140905020156/http://www.sptimes.com/2003/07/14/news_pf/State/Ballot_display_revive.shtml | url-status = live

File:Kalpi israel 18.JPG|Ballots may be tickets rather than forms, as in Israel. File:Butterfly Voters View.jpg|Perspective view of a 2000 Palm Beach County, Florida "butterfly ballot" File:Butterfly Ballot, Florida 2000 (large).jpg|Top view of the same 2000 Florida "butterfly ballot" File:Bulleten Gosduma 2011.jpg|Russian ballot to the 2011 State Duma elections with a list of political parties

Methods

In a jurisdiction using an optical scan voting system, voters choose by filling an oval, by completing an arrow, or (as in South Korea) by stamping a box, on the printed ballot next to their chosen option, similar to many standardized tests. Voters with disabilities may be provided with electronic ballot marking devices.

Alternatively, voters could pick from one pre-marked ballot among many (similar to the paper ballot systems in Israel and France), which would then be scanned by an optical scanner. Tabulating machines count the ballots either after the polls close or as the voters feed the ballots into the machine, in which case the results are not known until after the polls close. Officials will often manually count any ballots that cannot be read or with a write-in candidate and may recount all ballots in the event of a dispute.

In a jurisdiction using a punched card system, voters choose by removing or "punching out" a perforated chad from the ballot next to each choice, sometimes with tools as simple as a pin, but usually with a ballot marking device such as the Votomatic. The ballot may be preprinted with candidates and referendums, or may be a generic ballot placed under a printed list of candidates and referendums. Tabulating machines count ballots after the polls close. Officials may manually count the ballots in the event of a dispute. Punched card voting systems are being replaced by other voting systems because of a high rate of inaccuracy related to the incomplete removal of the perforated chad and the inaccessibility to voters with disabilities.

In a jurisdiction using a mechanical voting system, often called a "voting machine", voters choose by pulling a lever next to their choice. There is a printed list of candidates, parties and referendums next to the levers indicating which lever is assigned to which choice. When the voter pulls a lever, it turns a connected gear in the machine, which turns a counter wheel. Each counter wheel shows a number, which is the number of votes cast using that lever. After the polls close, election officials check the wheels' positions and record the totals. No physical ballot is used in this system, except when the voter chooses to write-in a candidate. Other systems are replacing mechanical voting systems because they are inaccessible to disabled voters, do not have a physical ballot, or are getting old.

In a jurisdiction using an electronic direct record voting system (DRE), voters choose by pushing a button next to a printed list of candidates and referendums, or by touching the candidate or referendums box on a touchscreen interface, or (as in Brazil) by inputting alphanumeric codes that correspond to candidates or positions. As the voter makes a selection, the DRE creates an electronic ballot stored in the memory components of the system. After the polls close, the system counts the votes and reports the totals to the election officials. Many DREs include a communication device to transmit vote totals to a central tabulator. The touchscreen systems are similar to an automated teller machine (ATM).

Most DRE voting machines in the U.S. now include an auditable paper ballot, a widely accepted best practice for election administration. After voters register their choices on the touchscreen, a paper ballot is created with the choices printed on it. The voter visually verifies that the choices are correct, then inserts the paper ballot into a secure box where ballots are accumulated for use in audits or recounts.

As of the 2024 US general election, only 1.4 percent of voters use DRE machines without a paper record, including the entire state of Louisiana.

References

References

1. "Ballot". Merriam-Webster.
2. "Ballot | Origin and meaning of ballot by Online Etymology Dictionary".
3. (February 2022). "Ballot". Merriam-Webster Learner's Dictionary.
4. "Ballot". Online Etymology Dictionary.
5. "Panchayat Raj, Policy notes 2011-2012". Rural development & panchayat raj department, TN Government, India.
6. (2 April 2010). "Heritage in a park". [[The Hindu]].
7. (27 June 2005). "Handbook on Kongu archaeological treasures". [[The Hindu]].
8. [http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/ Jones, Douglas W.] {{Webarchive. link. (2011-09-21 . [http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/voting/pictures/ A Brief Illustrated History of Voting] {{Webarchive). link. (2011-09-21 ''[http://www.uiowa.edu/ University of Iowa] {{Webarchive). link. (2011-10-29 [http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/ Department of Computer Science] ''.)
9. "Statement of Commissioner Victoria Wilson". Voting Irregularities in Florida During the 2000 Presidential Election, www.usccr.gov.
10. Dershowitz, ''[[Supreme Injustice. Supreme Injustice: How the High Court Hijacked Election 2000]]'', pp. 22–28. {{ISBN. 9780195148275
11. (2020). "This is What Democracy Looked Like". Princeton Architectural Press.
12. "The Butterfly Did It: The Aberrant Vote for Buchanan in Palm Beach County, Florida".
13. "Understanding the Japanese Election System".
14. (2023). "5 Proactive Steps to Foster Trust in Your Elections and Results".
15. Kipp, Jacob. (2018-05-09). "When Voting, Most of Us Leave a Paper Trail".
16. "Verifier".