Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
law

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights


Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. This includes the freedom to change a religion or belief, and to manifest a religion or belief in worship, teaching, practice and observance, subject to certain restrictions that are "in accordance with law" and "necessary in a democratic society".

Article text

**Article 9 – Freedom of thought, conscience and religion**
  1. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change her/his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest her/his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.
  2. Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.}}

History

  • Cuius regio, eius religio was a principle of European international law, beginning in the 16th century in the wake of the Protestant Reformation, that established freedom of religion for states, but not individuals.
  • The First Amendment to the United States Constitution was one of the first legal protections for freedom of religion without reference to any specific religion.
  • Article X of the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, which influenced the European Convention, declares freedom of religious opinion as a universal right.

Case law

  • European Court of Human Rights:
    • Buscarini and Others v. San Marino (requirement of religious oaths for public office not permitted)
    • Kokkinakis v. Greece (criminalization of proselytism, as defined in Greek law, permitted)
    • Leyla Şahin v. Turkey (university ban on Islamic headscarf permitted)
    • Pichon and Sajous v. France (no right to refuse supply of contraceptives on religious grounds)
    • Leela Förderkreis E.V. and Others v. Germany (regarding state information campaigns about a religious movement)
    • Universelles Leben e.V. v. Germany (regarding state information campaigns about a religious movement)
    • Lautsi v. Italy (legal requirement to display a crucifix in school classrooms permitted)
    • S.A.S. v. France (French ban on face coverings permitted)
    • Osmanoğlu and Kocabaş v. Switzerland (permitted to require children to participate in mixed swimming lessons and enforce this through fines)
    • Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v. Belgium (bans on ritual slaughter without prior stunning permitted)
  • High Court of England and Wales:
    • Connolly v DPP (no ground for appeal under Article 9 against conviction for sending indecent or grossly offensive material, namely images of aborted foetuses)

Literature

Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report