Arch bridge

History

Possibly the oldest existing arch bridge is the Mycenaean Arkadiko Bridge in Greece from about 1300 BC. The stone corbel arch bridge is still used by the local populace. The well-preserved Hellenistic Eleutherna Bridge has a triangular corbel arch. The 4th century BC Rhodes Footbridge rests on an early voussoir arch.

Although true arches were already known by the Etruscans and ancient Greeks, the Romans were – as with the vault and the dome – the first to fully realize the potential of arches for bridge construction. A list of Roman bridges compiled by the engineer Colin O'Connor features 330 Roman stone bridges for traffic, 34 Roman timber bridges and 54 Roman aqueduct bridges, a substantial part still standing and even used to carry vehicles. A more complete survey by the Italian scholar Vittorio Galliazzo found 931 Roman bridges, mostly of stone, in as many as 26 countries (including former Yugoslavia).

Roman arch bridges were usually semicircular, although a number were segmental arch bridges (such as Alconétar Bridge), a bridge which has a curved arch that is less than a semicircle. The advantages of the segmental arch bridge were that it allowed great amounts of flood water to pass under it, which would prevent the bridge from being swept away during floods and the bridge itself could be more lightweight. Generally, Roman bridges featured wedge-shaped primary arch stones (voussoirs) of the same in size and shape. The Romans built both single spans and lengthy multiple arch aqueducts, such as the Pont du Gard and Segovia Aqueduct. Their bridges featured from an early time onwards flood openings in the piers, e.g. in the Pons Fabricius in Rome (62 BC), one of the world's oldest major bridges still standing.

Roman engineers were the first and until the Industrial Revolution the only ones to construct bridges with concrete, which they called Opus caementicium. The outside was usually covered with brick or ashlar, as in the Alcántara Bridge.

The Romans also introduced segmental arch bridges into bridge construction. The 330 m Limyra Bridge in southwestern Turkey features 26 segmental arches with an average span-to-rise ratio of 5.3:1, giving the bridge an unusually flat profile unsurpassed for more than a millennium. Trajan's bridge over the Danube featured open-spandrel segmental arches made of wood (standing on 40 m concrete piers). This was to be the longest arch bridge for a thousand years both in terms of overall and individual span length, while the longest extant Roman bridge is the 790 m long Puente Romano at Mérida. The late Roman Karamagara Bridge in Cappadocia may represent the earliest surviving bridge featuring a pointed arch.

In medieval Europe, bridge builders improved on the Roman structures by using narrower piers, thinner arch barrels and higher span-to-rise ratios on bridges. Gothic pointed arches were also introduced, reducing lateral thrust, and spans increased as with the eccentric Puente del Diablo (1282). With more advanced design and bridge-building techniques, the alternative informal name of Devil's Bridge became more widely used across Europe, because many people could not believe that these were man-made and capable of carrying the size of loads that they did.

The 14th century in particular saw bridge building reaching new heights. Span lengths of 40 m, previously unheard of in the history of masonry arch construction, were now reached in places as diverse as Spain (Puente de San Martín), Italy (Castelvecchio Bridge) and France (Devil's bridge and Pont Grand) and with arch types as different as semi-circular, pointed and segmental arches. The bridge at Trezzo sull'Adda, destroyed in the 15th century, even featured a span length of 72 m, not matched until 1796.

Constructions such as the acclaimed Florentine segmental arch bridge Ponte Vecchio (1345) combined sound engineering (span-to-rise ratio of over 5.3 to 1) with aesthetical appeal. The three elegant arches of the Renaissance Ponte Santa Trinita (1569) constitute the oldest elliptic arch bridge worldwide. Such low rising structures required massive abutments, which at the Venetian Rialto Bridge (1591) and the Pegnitz or Fleischbrücke (1598) in Nuremberg (span-to-rise ratio 6.4:1) were founded on thousands of wooden piles, partly rammed obliquely into the grounds to counteract more effectively the lateral thrust.

In China, the oldest extant arch bridge is the Zhaozhou Bridge of 605 CE, which combined a very low span-to-rise ratio of 5.2:1, with the use of spandrel arches (buttressed with iron brackets). The Zhaozhou Bridge, with a length of 51 m and span of 37.4 m, is the world's first wholly stone open-spandrel segmental arch bridge, allowing a greater passage for flood waters. Bridges with perforated spandrels can be found worldwide, such as the Bridge of Arta, (17th century) Greece and Cenarth Bridge, (18th century) in Wales.

With the coming of the Industrial Revolution, in the 18th and 19th centuries, stone and brick arches continued to be built by many prominent British civil engineers, including Thomas Telford, John Rennie, and latterly Isambard Kingdom Brunel. They also started the modern usage of different materials, such as cast iron — Telford designed the first bridge built of metal, completed in 1781, the Iron Bridge with a single arch of sections of cast iron constructed in traditional woodworking techniques — and then steel and concrete, which have been increasingly used in the construction of arch bridges, to almost the exclusion of other materials. A key pioneer was Jean-Rodolphe Perronet, who used much narrower piers, revised calculation methods, and exceptionally low span-to-rise ratios.

Simple compression arch bridges

Advantages of simple materials

Stone, brick and other such materials are strong in compression and somewhat so in shear, but cannot resist much force in tension. As a result, masonry arch bridges are designed to be constantly under compression, so far as is possible. Each arch is constructed over a temporary falsework frame, known as a centring. In the first compression arch bridges, a keystone in the middle of the bridge bore the weight of the rest of the bridge. The more weight that was put onto the bridge, the stronger its structure became. Masonry arch bridges use a quantity of fill material (typically compacted rubble) above the arch in order to increase this dead-weight on the bridge and prevent tension from occurring in the arch ring as loads move across the bridge. Other materials that were used to build this type of bridge were brick and unreinforced concrete. When masonry (cut stone) is used, the angles of the faces are cut to minimize shear forces. Where random masonry (uncut and unprepared stones) is used, they are mortared together and the mortar is allowed to set before the falsework is removed.

Traditional masonry arches are generally durable, and somewhat resistant to settlement or undermining. However, relative to modern alternatives, such bridges are very heavy, requiring extensive foundations. They are also expensive to build wherever labor costs are high.

Construction sequence

• Where the arches are founded in a watercourse bed (on piers or banks) the water is diverted so the gravel can first be excavated and replaced with a good footing (of strong material). From these, the foundation piers are erected/raised to the height of the intended base of the arches, a point known as the springing.
• Falsework centering (in British English: arch frame) is fabricated, typically from timbers and boards. Since each arch of a multi-arch bridge will impose a thrust upon its neighbors, it is necessary either that all arches of the bridge be raised at the same time, or that very wide piers be used. The thrust from the end arches is taken into the earth by substantial (vertical) footings at the canyon walls, or by large inclined planes forming in a sense ramps to the bridge, which may also be formed of arches.
• The several arches are (or single arch is) constructed over the centering. Once each basic arch barrel is constructed, the arches are (or arch is) stabilized with infill masonry above, which may be laid in horizontal running bond courses (layers). These may form two outer walls, known as the spandrels, which are then infilled with appropriate loose material and rubble.
• The road is paved and parapet walls protectively confine traffic to the bridge.

Types of arch bridge

Corbel arch bridge

File:arkadiko2.jpg|Corbel arch built from Cyclopean masonry, in the Greek Arkadiko bridge File:Eleutherna Bridge, Crete, Greece. Pic 03.jpg|Corbel arch in the shape of an isosceles triangle, supporting the Greek Eleutherna Bridge File:Corbelledarch.png|A corbelled arch with the masonry untrimmed File:Trabeate Arch in New Delhi India.jpg|A corbel arch with the masonry cut into an arch shape The corbel arch bridge is a masonry, or stone, bridge where each successively higher course (layer) cantilevers slightly more than the previous course. The steps of the masonry may be trimmed to make the arch have a rounded shape. The corbel arch does not produce thrust, or outward pressure at the bottom of the arch, and is not considered a true arch. It is more stable than a true arch because it does not have this thrust. The disadvantage is that this type of arch is not suitable for large spans.

Aqueducts

File:Pont du Gard BLS.jpg|The three-story Roman Pont du Gard aqueduct near Nimes, France File:Aqueduct of Segovia 02.jpg|Roman Aqueduct of Segovia, Spain File:Tomar December 2008-4.jpg|The Aqueduto dos Pegões in Tomar, Portugal File:Vila do Conde 3.jpg|The Aqueduct of Vila do Conde, Portugal with a distinct angular turn File:Aquadukt, Kavala.jpg|16th-century Ottoman Kavala aqueduct, Greece with both a distinct angular turn and a curve in the structure shown in an overhead image File:1, Μεσαιωνικό υδραγωγείο Καμάρες Καβάλας (photosiotas).jpg|Kavala aqueduct near Nikotsara Square showing the curve of the structure from street level File:Acueducto, Arcos del Sitio, Tepotzotlán.jpg|The colonial Aqueduct, Tepotzotlán, State of Mexico File:Vanvitelli aqueduct.jpg|UNESCO World Heritage Site Aqueduct of Vanvitelli, Italy, built by Luigi Vanvitelli File:pontcysyllte aqueduct arp.jpg|UNESCO World Heritage Site Pontcysyllte Aqueduct carrying the Llangollen Canal by civil engineers Thomas Telford and William Jessop in Wales, with a narrowboat crossing File:WalesC0047.jpg|The Pontcysyllte Aqueduct over the River Dee viewed from the Vale of Llangollen, with a narrowboat crossing File:Union icicle.jpg|The Almond Aqueduct carrying the Edinburgh and Glasgow Union Canal over River Almond at Ratho with a frozen overflow channel during the big freeze of 2010 File:Avon Aqueduct - geograph.org.uk - 1691980.jpg|The Avon Aqueduct carrying the Edinburgh and Glasgow Union Canal over the Avon near Linlithgow File:Dowley Gap Aqueduct - geograph.org.uk - 353210.jpg|The Dowley Gap or the Seven Arches Aqueduct by the civil engineer James Brindley carrying the Leeds and Liverpool Canal over the River Aire, Yorkshire File:Dundas Aqueduct, from south-east.jpg|The Dundas Aqueduct in Bath Stone by the civil engineer John Rennie carrying the Kennet and Avon Canal over the River Avon and the Wessex Main Line railway at Limpley Stoke, near Bath, England File:Engine Arm Aqueduct east.jpg|The Engine Arm Aqueduct, by the civil engineer Thomas Telford and cast by Horseley Ironworks, carrying the Engine Arm, a Birmingham Canal Navigations feeder, over the BCN Main Line File:Engine Arm Aqueduct west.jpg|The Engine Arm Aqueduct close-up image showing the arch from below

In some locations it is necessary to span a wide gap at a relatively high elevation, such as when a canal or water supply must span a valley. Rather than building extremely large arches, or very tall supporting columns (difficult using stone), a series of arched structures are built one atop another, with wider structures at the base. Roman civil engineers developed the design and constructed highly refined structures using only simple materials, equipment, and mathematics. This type is still used in canal viaducts and roadways as it has a pleasing shape, particularly when spanning water, as the reflections of the arches form a visual impression of circles or ellipses.

Open-spandrel deck arch bridge Closed-spandrel deck arch bridge

Deck arch bridge

File:Limyra Bridge Arch.svg|Diagram of a Roman segmental arch of a stone deck arch bridge with a closed spandrel — Bridge at Limyra File:arch bridge nomenclature.png|Diagram of an open-spandrel deck arch bridge File:Pont romain-Pont st Martin.jpg|Roman Pont-Saint-Martin File:Grosvenor_Bridge_Chester4.JPG|Grosvenor Bridge (Chester), a closed-spandrel arch bridge File:Alexander Hamilton Bridge from river jeh.jpg|Alexander Hamilton Bridge, an open-spandrel arch bridge File:Galena_Creek_Bridge_in_June_2012.jpg|Galena Creek Bridge, a cathedral arch bridge Open-spandrel deck arch bridge This type of bridge comprises an arch where the deck is completely above the arch. The area between the arch and the deck is known as the spandrel. If the spandrel is solid, usually the case in a masonry or stone arch bridge, the bridge is called a closed-spandrel deck arch bridge. If the deck is supported by a number of vertical columns rising from the arch, the bridge is known as an open-spandrel deck arch bridge. The Alexander Hamilton Bridge is an example of an open-spandrel arch bridge. Finally, if the arch supports the deck only at the top of the arch, the bridge is called a cathedral arch bridge.

:**

Through arch bridge

Main article: Through arch bridge

:**

This type of bridge has an arch whose base is at or below the deck, but whose top rises above it, so the deck passes through the arch. The central part of the deck is supported by the arch via suspension cables or tie bars, as with a tied-arch bridge. The ends of the bridge may be supported from below, as with a deck arch bridge. Any part supported from arch below may have spandrels that are closed or open.

The Sydney Harbour Bridge and the Bayonne Bridge are a through arch bridge which uses a truss type arch.

Tied-arch bridge

Main article: Tied-arch bridge

Also known as a bowstring arch, this type of arch bridge incorporates a tie between two opposite ends of the arch. The tie is usually the deck and is capable of withstanding the horizontal thrust forces which would normally be exerted on the abutments of an arch bridge.

The deck is suspended from the arch. The arch is in compression, in contrast to a suspension bridge where it's catenary arch is in tension. A tied-arch bridge can also be a through arch bridge.

File:USACE Fremont Bridge Portland.jpg|The deck of the Fremont Bridge goes through the arch, the central span is suspended from and ties the arch, while the side spans of the deck are supported.

Hinged arch bridge

Main article: Hinged arch bridge

An arch bridge with hinges incorporated to allow movement between structural elements. A single-hinged bridge has a hinge at the crown of the arch, a two-hinged bridge has hinges at both springing points and a three-hinged bridge has hinged in all three locations.

Gallery

• Bridge
• Viaduct
• List of bridge types
• Deck (bridge)
• List of arch bridges by length
• List of longest masonry arch bridge spans
• Flying junction
• Natural arch
• Parabolic arch
• Roman bridge
• Skew arch
• Through arch bridge
• Tied arch bridge
• Truss arch bridge
• List of bridges
  • Crueize Viaduct
  • Glenfinnan Viaduct
  • Ribblehead Viaduct

Footnotes

References

• {{Citation
• {{Citation
• {{Citation
• {{Citation
• {{Citation

References

1. link. (8 April 2008)
2. Nakassis, Athanassios (2000): "The Bridges of Ancient Eleutherna", ''The Annual of the British School at Athens'', Vol. 95, pp. 353–365
3. {{harvnb. Galliazzo. 1995. Boyd. 1978
4. Robertson, D.S.: Greek and Roman Architecture, 2nd edn., Cambridge 1943, p. 231:

   "The Romans were the first builders in Europe, perhaps the first in the world, fully to appreciate the advantages of the arch, the vault and the dome."

5. O'Connor, Colin: "Roman Bridges", Cambridge University Press 1993, p. 187ff. {{ISBN. 0-521-39326-4
6. Galliazzo, Vittorio (1994), I ponti romani. Catalogo generale, Vol. 2, Treviso: Edizioni Canova, {{ISBN. 88-85066-66-6, cf. Indice
7. Beall, Christine. (1988). "Designing the segmental arch". ebuild.com.
8. Temple, Robert. The Genius of China: 3,000 Years of Science, Discovery, and Invention. New York: Touchstone, 1986.
9. O'Connor, Colin: "Roman Bridges", Cambridge University Press 1993, p. 126 {{ISBN. 0-521-39326-4
10. {{harvnb. Galliazzo. 1995
11. Troyano, Leonardo Fernández: Bridge Engineering. A Global Perspective, Thomas Telford Publishing, London 2003, {{ISBN. 0-7277-3215-3, p. 49
12. Needham, Joseph. ''The Shorter Science and Civilisation in China''. Cambridge University Press, 1994. {{ISBN. 0-521-29286-7. pp. 145–147.
13. Richman, Steven M.. (2005). "The Bridges of New Jersey". Rutgers University Press.
14. Harris, Cyril M.. (1983). "Illustrated Dictionary of Historic Architecture". Courier Dover Publications.
15. Simpson, Frederick Moore. (1913). "A history of architectural development". Longmans, Green, and Co..
16. Durski, Brad F.. (Winter 2010). "Nevada's Galena Creek Bridge". Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute.
17. (7 August 2007). "Reinforced Concrete Designer's Handbook, Eleventh Edition". CRC Press.
18. Gorazd Humar. (September 2001). "World Famous Arch Bridges in Slovenia". Presses des Ponts.
19. "Longest bridge, steel arch bridge". Guinness World Records.