From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Antiisomorphism
Isomorphism from A to the opposite of B
Isomorphism from A to the opposite of B
In category theory, a branch of mathematics, an antiisomorphism (or anti-isomorphism) between structured sets A and B is an isomorphism from A to the opposite of B (or equivalently from the opposite of A to B). If there exists an antiisomorphism between two structures, they are said to be antiisomorphic.
Intuitively, to say that two mathematical structures are antiisomorphic is to say that they are basically opposites of one another.
The concept is particularly useful in an algebraic setting, as, for instance, when applied to rings.
Simple example
Let A be the binary relation (or directed graph) consisting of elements {1,2,3} and binary relation \rightarrow defined as follows:
- 1 \rightarrow 2,
- 1 \rightarrow 3,
- 2 \rightarrow 1.
Let B be the binary relation set consisting of elements {a,b,c} and binary relation \Rightarrow defined as follows:
- b \Rightarrow a,
- c \Rightarrow a,
- a \Rightarrow b.
Note that the opposite of B (denoted Bop) is the same set of elements with the opposite binary relation \Leftarrow (that is, reverse all the arcs of the directed graph):
- b \Leftarrow a,
- c \Leftarrow a,
- a \Leftarrow b.
If we replace a, b, and c with 1, 2, and 3 respectively, we see that each rule in Bop is the same as some rule in A. That is, we can define an isomorphism \phi from A to Bop by \phi(1) = a, \phi(2) = b, \phi(3) = c. \phi is then an antiisomorphism between A and B.
Ring anti-isomorphisms
Specializing the general language of category theory to the algebraic topic of rings, we have: Let R and S be rings and f: R → S be a bijection. Then f is a ring anti-isomorphism if :f(x +_R y) = f(x) +_S f(y) \ \ \ \text{and} \ \ \ f(x \cdot_R y) = f(y) \cdot_S f(x) \ \ \ \text{for all } x,y \in R. If R = S then f is a ring anti-automorphism.
An example of a ring anti-automorphism is given by the conjugate mapping of quaternions: : x_0 + x_1 \mathbf{i} + x_2 \mathbf{j} + x_3 \mathbf{k} \ \ \mapsto \ \ x_0 - x_1 \mathbf{i} - x_2 \mathbf{j} - x_3 \mathbf{k}.
Notes
References
References
- {{harvnb. Pareigis. 1970
- {{harvnb. Jacobson. 1948
- {{harvnb. Baer. 2005
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Antiisomorphism — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report