From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
99 Percent Declaration
Non-profit organization in Kentucky, United States
Non-profit organization in Kentucky, United States
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| document_name | 99 Percent Declaration |
| image | 99 Percent Declaration logo.jpg |
| image_size | 200px |
| image_caption | Website logo |
| date_created | October 7, 2011 |
| writer | 99% Declaration Working Group |
The 99 Percent Declaration or 99% Declaration is a not-for-profit organization based in Kentucky that originated from a working group of the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement in Zuccotti Park, New York City, in October 2011. The organization published a document calling for a "National General Assembly" to be held beginning the week of July 4, 2012 in Philadelphia,{{cite news |access-date= 2012-01-23 |access-date= 2012-01-23 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20141015105217/http://articles.philly.com/2011-10-19/news/30298097_1_protesters-tents-encampment |url-status= dead |archive-date= October 15, 2014 |access-date= 2012-01-23 |access-date= 2012-01-23 |access-date= 2012-01-23 |archive-date= 2014-02-28 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140228131909/http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2011/10/19/%E2%80%98occupy%E2%80%99-to-hold-national-assembly-in-philadelphia/ |url-status= dead
Background
The Occupy Wall Street movement began as an advertised demonstration which posed the question "What is our one Demand?", inviting protesters to identify and rally around a particular cause. This led several individuals and groups to propose various demands including the 99 Percent Declaration.
"Occupy" protesters from across the country have said that the 99 Percent Declaration group "is simply co-opting the 'Occupy' name", and Occupy Wall Street has not endorsed the 99% Declaration, which reportedly "generated more controversy than consensus" at the New York General Assembly and was "flat out rejected by the Philadelphia General Assembly."{{cite web | access-date = June 1, 2012}} The Occupy Philadelphia General Assembly stated that "We do not support the 99% Declaration, its group, its website, its National GA and anything else associated with it." Occupy Wall Street released a statement indicating that "[t]he group's plans blatantly contradict OWS' Statement of Autonomy, as passed by the General Assembly at Occupy Wall Street," and clarifying that any statement issued outside of the New York City General Assembly's website "should be considered independent of Occupy Wall Street." A Washington Times editorial criticized the group's proposed restrictions on political contributions and speech, saying they "would leave us less free and show a woeful contempt for the First Amendment."
Attorney Michael Pollok had issued a press release representing himself as the group's co-founder and publicizing its plans, also expressing understanding that the NY General Assembly "fears 'co-opting' by Occupy spin-off groups like ours", but indicating his belief that "occupations and protests will not end the corporate state" and that a petition for redress of grievances is the best way to achieve the "dismantling [of] corporate control of our country".{{cite press release | access-date = April 20, 2012}}
Michael Pollok has stated on his earliest websites and Facebook pages (since deleted or edited) that he came into contact with OWS through providing legal representation to several of the people who were arrested on September 30, 2011 during a march of 700 protesters across the Brooklyn Bridge. None of those protesters has ever come forward to verify this.
Very early on, the group was fraught with contention among participants and went through several incarnations of leadership before the actual event that took place the weekend of July 4, 2012.
The group spent approximately $30,000 on voting software, voting handhelds, and support which depleted the group's budget and caused them to cancel promises to pay for all delegate transportation costs. Despite that setback, about 75 people attended out of the planned 100. A lot of debate occurred in the first of two days about only having Yes and No options on the handhelds. [A May 2025 Model Constitutional Convention held at Arizona State University used paddles. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSFPOrEtQGc]
Despite some setbacks, the National Assembly generated 15 grievances. Instead of grievances, some delegates preferred to call them proposed Amendments to the Constitution. After the two day assembly, the Executive Committee typed up the grievances and submitted them to the President and Congress as specified in the Constitution. Then the delegation marched to Independence Hall and read the grievances on the lawn.
For more information about the 2012 National Assembly, please view Eliot Hochberg's YouTube video below.
Due to depletion of funds for the National Assembly, 99 Percent Declaration disbanded afterwards.
In 2024, Michael Kelley, a delegate at the 2012 National Assembly, founded ProjectLeapfrog.org, a non-profit dedicated to calling a Limited Constitutional Convention with just two Draft Amendments: Rights of People Only and Rights of Campaign Finance Limits.
The document and national general assembly
A national general assembly, the Continental Congress 2.0, was announced in March 2012. It was organized by the 99% Declaration working group. The Congress was to comprise 878 delegates, from all 435 Congressional districts, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia; however not every district was represented though about 836 contributed to topics to be included and voting on their selection for inclusion in the petition. Only about 76 delegates were finally elected and present at the gathering, which lasted from July 2 to 4.
The Congress drafted and ratified a 21st-century petition for the redress of grievances, in accordance with the right to petition guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution. The petition was to be publicly presented to the American people and copies were to be served to the United States Congress, Supreme Court and President Barack Obama.
The Occupy National Gathering movement was protesting in Philadelphia during the gathering.
References
References
- Walsh, J. (October 20, 2011) [http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/do_we_know_what_ows_wants_yet/singleton/ "Do we know what OWS wants yet?"] ''Salon''
- "99% Declaration site".
- "99 Declaration Working Group". the99declaration.org.
- [http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20111217130645347 LaIntelligencia "99% Declaration Receives a Vote of “No Support” from OP GA" Occupy Philly Media, 15 December 2011]
- The 99% Working Group. (March 7, 2012). "Continental Congress 2.0". [[Marketwire]].
- "99 Declaration Working Group". the99declaration.org.
- Pollock, Michael. (April 2, 2012). "GUEST OPINION: Reboot democracy with 'Continental Congress 2.0'". WickedLocal.
- Rush, Stephen. (October 8, 2014). "Continental Congress 2.0 Petition". willofthepeople.agency.
- Price, Timothy. (July 6, 2012). "Continental Congress 2.0 update". occupyuppervalley.org.
- "The 99% Declaration". the99declaration.org.
- Pollock, Michael S. (April 9, 2012). "Reboot democracy with Continental Congress 2.0". [[Wickedlocal.com]].
- "What is national Gathering?". occupynationalgathering.com.
- Scala, Gina G. (July 2, 2012). "Occupy Philly inspires Continental Congress 2.0". newjerseynewsroom.com.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 99 Percent Declaration — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report