From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
2011 Wisconsin Supreme Court election
Judicial election in the U.S. state of Wisconsin
Judicial election in the U.S. state of Wisconsin
Field
Value
election_name
2011 Wisconsin Supreme Court election
country
Wisconsin
type
presidential
ongoing
No
previous_election
2009 Wisconsin Supreme Court election
previous_year
2009
next_election
2013 Wisconsin Supreme Court election
next_year
2013
election_date
April 5, 2011
image1
Dave Prosser (3484692420) (3x4).jpg
candidate1
David Prosser Jr.
popular_vote1
752,694
percentage1
50.23%
image2
Kloppenburg (5550956424) (1).jpg
candidate2
JoAnne Kloppenburg
popular_vote2
745,690
percentage2
49.77%
map_image
2011 Wisconsin Supreme Court Election.svg
map_size
250px
map_caption
County results
Prosser:
Kloppenburg:
title
Justice
before_election
David Prosser Jr.
after_election
David Prosser Jr.
previous_seat_election
2001 Wisconsin Supreme Court election
previous_seat_year
2001
next_seat_election
2020 Wisconsin Supreme Court election
next_seat_year
2020
colour2
c0c0c0
colour1
c0c0c0
**Prosser: **
**Kloppenburg: **
The 2011 Wisconsin Supreme Court election took place on Tuesday, April 5, 2011. The incumbent justice, David Prosser Jr., was re-elected to another ten-year term, defeating assistant attorney general JoAnne Kloppenburg. Unlike past elections for the Wisconsin Supreme Court, the race gained significant nationwide publicity as it was widely seen as the first referendum on Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker's proposed anti-union legislation and the resulting protests.
Primary election
In December 2010, Prosser's campaign director expressed strong support for governor-elect Walker, saying Prosser's "personal ideology more closely mirrors" Walker's, and that a win by Prosser would result in, "protecting the conservative judicial majority and acting as a common sense compliment to both the new administration and Legislature." He later disavowed the statements and claimed he had not seen the release. Prosser's campaign manager also said, "This election is about a 4-3 common sense conservative majority vs. a 3-4 liberal majority, and nothing more."
In a survey of attorneys conducted by the Milwaukee Bar Association that was published February 2011, Prosser received more votes saying he was "qualified" than any of his opponents; besting Kloppenburg by a margin of 296 to 112. He was endorsed in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, and the Sun Prairie Star. He won the primary handily, receiving 231,000 votes to second place finisher Kloppenburg's 105,000 votes; a 30% margin.
Candidates
Advanced
JoAnne Kloppenburg, assistant Wisconsin Attorney General
David Prosser, incumbent Justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court
Eliminated in primary
Marla Stephens, director of appeals for Wisconsin Public Defender office
Joel Winnig, attorney
Results
Results by county:
]]
General election
Campaign
In the general election of April 5, 2011, Prosser again faced Kloppenburg. The contest received considerable attention due to the ongoing protests of Walker's budget repair bill and limitations on public employee bargaining rights; issues which would likely soon come before the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Heading into the election, the court had a conservative majority of 4-2-1 with Prosser identifying as a conservative and N. Patrick Crooks considered a swing vote. Both candidates stated their unhappiness with the increasingly partisan nature of the race.
Kloppenburg, supported by unions, particularly those of the public sector employees, tried to tie Prosser to the policies of Republican Governor Walker, and his March 2011 law limiting most of Wisconsin's public employees' collective bargaining rights. The non-partisan race for the court seat was also characterized as a proxy battle or referendum on the administration of Governor Walker and other Republican officials. Both candidates indicated their unhappiness regarding the increasingly partisan nature of the race, with Prosser claiming that his defeat would mean the end of judicial independence.
On March 31, Prosser's campaign co-chair, former Democratic governor Patrick Lucey, resigned from the campaign and endorsed Kloppenburg, claiming Prosser had lost his impartiality, and was showing "a disturbing distemper and lack of civility that does not bode well for the High Court". The Wausau Daily Herald reversed its primary election endorsement, and urged its readers to vote against Prosser in the general, describing him as "an intemperate figure given to partisan rhetoric". Citing the earlier statement of Prosser's campaign director that the election is about maintaining a conservative majority on the court, The Capital Times endorsed Kloppenburg. Prosser was endorsed by the Sun Prairie Star, The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, and former Alaska governor Sarah Palin (via Twitter), among others for the general election.
State officials predicted a voter turnout of around 20 percent, a typical level of turnout for an April election. However, voter interest and turnout were unusually high with nearly 1.5 million votes cast.
Results
On April 6, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, with 100% of precincts reporting and absentee ballots all tallied, had Kloppenburg maintaining a 204 vote lead. Re-canvassing began the next day to verify to election results, and errors were found in counties favoring both contestants; Prosser gained votes from Winnebago and Waukesha, while Kloppenburg regained ground from a scattering of other counties, including Grant, Portage, Door, Iowa, Rusk, Vernon, and Shawano. A news conference on April 7, held by the County Clerk of Waukesha County reported the existence of errors in Brookfield, Wisconsin where votes were never submitted to the Waukesha County total due to human error and that Prosser had picked up a 7,500-vote margin over Kloppenburg in the county as a result. In response, the Kloppenburg campaign filed an Open Records request for the contact records of the Waukesha County Clerk and a request was filed with the region's US Attorney to impound the additional ballots.
As of April 8, 2011, Waukesha County's turnout was officially 47% (increased from 42% before the correction). Statewide turnout during the election was officially 33%. On election day, Deputy Clerk Gina Kozlik had estimated turnout in the county to be 20-25%, with up to 35% turnout in some polling locations within the county. Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight did an analysis on the turnout numbers and found the Waukesha results to be in line with previous elections. An independent investigation into the actions of Waukesha County Clerk found probable cause to believe that she violated the state law requiring county clerks to post all returns on Election Night, but concluded that the violation was not wilful and therefore did not constitute criminal misconduct.
The Wisconsin Government Accountability Board announced on April 8 that they were sending voting officials to Waukesha County to confirm the 14,315 votes that were found to never have been submitted from Brookfield. On April 15, Prosser was named the official winner by 7,316 votes after all county canvassing was completed. On April 20, Kloppenburg asked for a recount. The recount began on Wednesday, April 27 and must finish by May 9.
At the end of May 9, all Wisconsin counties aside from Waukesha had completed their recount process. In response, a Dane County judge gave them an extension until May 26 to complete the recount process. It was reported that Waukesha County was counting only one ward at a time and, on May 9, moved to a larger area in the Waukesha County courthouse in order to count two wards at one time. This is much slower than the rest of the counties, adjacent Milwaukee County reportedly counted eight wards simultaneously. Waukesha County reportedly took extra steps to ensure all votes were counted correctly.
On May 20, the recount was completed across the state with Prosser leading by 7,006 votes. On May 23, the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board confirmed Prosser won the election.
This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
