2010 United Nations Security Council election

Rules

In accordance with the Security Council's rotation rules, whereby the ten non-permanent UNSC seats rotate among the various regional blocs into which UN member states traditionally divide themselves for voting and representation purposes, the five available seats were allocated as follows:

• One for the African Group (previously held by Uganda)
• One for the Asian Group (previously held by Japan)
• One for the Latin American and Caribbean Group (previously held by Mexico)
• Two for the Western European and Others Group (previously held by Turkey and Austria)

The five members served on the Security Council for the 2011–12 period.

Candidates

For the WEOG seats, Germany, Canada and Portugal stood for election. India ran uncontested for the Asian seat since Kazakhstan stood aside. South Africa also ran uncontested for the African seat after being endorsed by the African Union. After dropping out in favour of Brazil in the 2009 election, Colombia also ran unopposed.

Elected members

Africa: South Africa replaces Uganda

Asia: India replaces Japan

GRULAC: Colombia replaces Mexico

WEOG: Germany and Portugal replace Austria and Turkey

Results

The results in the three uncontested seats were as follows: India received 187 votes, South Africa 182 votes and Colombia 186 votes.

African and Asian States

Latin American and Caribbean States

Western European and Others Group

For the two Western European and Others Seats the results were as follows:

Round 1

Germany was elected as they passed the two-thirds majority.

Round 2

Following this round of voting Canada officially withdrew its candidacy.

Round 3

Some states continued to vote for Canada, as withdrawal of candidacy is not binding and member states may vote for any state they please. However, the withdrawal was sufficient to ensure the election of Portugal by a two-thirds majority.

Reactions

Canada

Canadian Foreign Minister Lawrence Cannon acknowledged that foreign policy under the Conservative government had played a role in the loss – even as he said that policy is based on sound democratic and human rights principles. "We will not back down from our principles that form the basis of our great country, and we will continue to pursue them on the international stage," Cannon said. "Some would even say that, because of our attachment to those values, we lost a seat on the council. If that's the case, then so be it." Blame was also shifted toward Liberal Party of Canada leader Michael Ignatieff for the defeat by the Conservative Party of Canada, though he rejected the blame as "ridiculous". "The blame game is a sign of a government that is unwilling to absorb the lessons of defeat." He, along with his foreign affairs critic Bob Rae, also said Prime Minister Stephen Harper had "paid the price" for a change in the foreign relations of Canada away from the traditional path of the Liberal and Progressive Conservative governments since the second half of the twentieth century. They cited Canada's tradition of peacekeeping missions, a balance in policies toward Israel and Palestine, aid and economic links with Africa and multilateral work on the environment and other global issues. One former diplomat said "We've suffered a loss that we haven't previously suffered in our foreign policy. It is a significant defeat for Canadian policy. We presented ourselves for a seat and the membership found us inadequate."

In a December 2011 interview, Canada's new foreign affairs minister John Baird attributed the failure to win a seat to principled positions taken by Canada on certain international issues: “Maybe if we had shut up, and not talked about gay rights in Africa; maybe if we had shut up and been more quiet about our concerns about Sri Lanka; maybe if we hadn't been so vocally against the deplorable human rights record in Iran, maybe Iran might have voted for us.... But we didn't and I don't think we regret anything. Iran probably voted against us; North Korea probably voted against us; Gadhafi probably voted against us. I think those are all badges of honour.”

India

India's envoy to the UN, Hardeep Singh Puri said "We have worked hard ... we have pushed for every single vote".

References

References

1. (22 September 2010). "Canada fears loss in UN Security Council race". CTV News.
2. (2008-10-14). "Turkey may in fact become a regional power through the UNSC". Panarmenian.Net.
3. "Question of equitable representation on the Security Council and the Economic and Social Council".
4. "UN Security Council non-permanent seat 2011-12". Germanyandafrica.diplo.de.
5. "Germany - Germany's candidature for the UN Security Council 2011/12". Auswaertiges-amt.de.
6. (2008-12-17). "Canada going for UN Security Council seat". Canada.com.
7. "Missão Permanente de Portugal junto das Nações Unidas". Un.int.
8. Collins, Michelle. (2009-03-04). "'Aggressive' Bid to Score Security Council Seat Underway | Embassy - Canada's Foreign Policy Newspaper". Embassymag.ca.
9. (2009-03-17). "CBC News - World - Tie Canada's bid for Security Council seat to water issue, Barlow urges". Cbc.ca.
10. "October's Security Council elections".
11. Lederer, Edith M.. (2010-10-12). "Germany and Portugal win Security Council seats". Seattle Times Newspaper.
12. (2010-10-12). "Canada loses prestige UN spot despite written guarantees from voting nations". Vancouver Sun.
13. (2010-10-12). "Don't blame me for UN Security Council defeat: Ignatieff". Montreal Gazette.
14. (2011-12-27). "Baird says no new UN Security Council campaign". CTV.
15. (2010-10-12). "India elected to UNSC with thumping majority". Rediff.com India News.