2010 Jordanian general election

Background

In 2009, King Abdullah II dissolved parliament on the grounds that it failed to "address the people's needs" only halfway through a four-year mandate, and also for "inept handling of legislation and failing to address poverty and unemployment."

In 1991, the National Accord was signed, 2 years after political parties were legalised and an election was called. In return for agreeing to work under the government instead of against it, political freedoms and legalisation of the parties were allowed. However, there had been allegations of repeated violations of the pact and attempts to undermine the election. An electoral law created in 1993 effectively gave the rural areas a larger representation at the expense of the urban areas and had in effect created sub-identities and split the country into Palestinian areas, most of whom tended to side with the Islamic Action Front or leftist and pan-Arab nationalists, and Bedouin areas.

Campaign

There were 763 candidates in the election, with 75% of incumbent MPs running again.

The main opposition, the Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated Islamic Action Front, announced on 30 July 2010 it would boycott the polls due to unfair election laws which gave undue weight to the rural, sparsely populated areas, and other issues. The "one-man-one-vote" law was seen as "engineered to deprive the Islamic Action Front of votes." Seven IAF candidates defied the boycott and ran as independents, with the IAF expelling five of them. As a result of the boycotts, including the main opposition group, the poll was viewed with skepticism.

Opinion polls

The result was expected to be a predictable win for pro-government candidates and tribesmen with strong ties to the monarchy.

Conduct

For the first time the government allowed international observers into the country, with 250 in attendance. The National Democratic Institute reported that there had been a "clear improvement" compared with the 2007 elections.

On election day, there were 53 instances of violence across the country,

Analysis

An Al Jazeera analysis said that while the election may have succeeded in "manufacturing consent", the costs may be much higher in that it fomented an "atmosphere of mutual suspicion that undermines national unity and social cohesion at a time when Jordan needs to confront tremors of regional instability."

References

References

1. [http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3809674,00.html Jordan calls early election] Ynetnews, 23 November 2009
2. (8 November 2010). "Scepticism mars Jordan polls – Middleeast". Al Jazeera.
3. "Jordan loyalists sweep election – Middle East". Al Jazeera.
4. AFP. (30 July 2010). "AFP: Islamists to boycott Jordan election".
5. [http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2163_E.htm Last elections] IPU
6. (26 October 2010). "Brotherhood expels members for defying boycott decision". The Jordan Times.
7. (9 November 2010). "Voting begins in Jordan elections – Middleeast". Al Jazeera.
8. Nisreen El-Shamayleh. (9 November 2010). "Jordan's parliament without an opposition | Al Jazeera Blogs". Blogs.aljazeera.net.
9. (9 November 2010). "Violence hits Jordanian election – Middleeast". Al Jazeera.
10. [http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/2010/11/2010111673416321438.html >> Manufacturing consent in Jordan ]