From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
2008 Colorado Amendment 46
none
none
| Field | Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| name | Amendment 46 | |||
| title | Discrimination and Preferential Treatment by Governments | |||
| date | November 4, 2008 | |||
| country | Colorado | |||
| yes | 1,102,046 | |||
| no | 1,138,134 | |||
| total | 2,240,180 | |||
| map | [[File:2008 Colorado Amendment 46 results map by county.svg | 300px]] | ||
| mapcaption | ||||
| {{legend | #B6C8D9 | 50–60% | border | 1px #AAAAAA solid}} |
| {{legend | #BCBC83 | 60–70% | border | 1px #AAAAAA solid}} |
| {{legend | #DEDEBD | 50–60% | border | 1px #AAAAAA solid}} |
For Against Amendment 46, also known as the Colorado Civil Rights Initiative, was a proposed initiative on the Colorado ballot for the state during the 2008 U.S general election. If ratified, Article II of the Colorado Constitution would have stated:
The State shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.
Controversy
The proposed initiative was sponsored by Californian Ward Connerly. In April, 2008, a Colorado group sued, claiming that over 69,000 signatures on the ballot petition were invalid. Some citizens also claimed that they signed the petition through voter fraud.
Governor Bill Ritter opposed the amendment, along with the Colorado Council of Churches.
Petition company
National Ballot Access was hired to manage this petition drive.
Result
Aftermath
Initiatives with the same language have been introduced and approved in five other states, including California (1996), Washington (1998), Michigan (2006), Nebraska (2008), and Arizona (2010); Colorado was the first state where it was defeated. On December 17, 2010 the University of Colorado at Boulder released a report analyzing the factors that led to the defeat of Amendment 46. According to the study, "...Coloradans overwhelmingly intended to support affirmative action on Election Day; arguably, were Amendment 46 a clearly worded referendum on attitudes toward affirmative action, it would have failed by a much wider margin: 66 to 34 percent." The report also found that (a) many voters were confused by the initiative, (b) voters who followed the measure in the media were more likely to oppose it, and (c) proposed alternative initiatives in support of equal opportunity contributed to the measure's defeat.
References
References
- David Montero (April 24, 2008). "[http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/apr/24/suit-filed-over-amendment-46/ Suit filed over Amendment 46]", ''[[Rocky Mountain News]]''.
- Blake Wesley (April 16, 2008). "[http://www.electionunspun.org/issues/local-elections/234-colorado-anti-affirmative-action-legislation-amendment-46 Colorado Anti-Affirmative Action Legislation Amendment 46] {{webarchive. link. (2008-10-10 ", electionunspun.org.)
- Jerd Smith (September 29, 2008). "[http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/sep/29/ritter-amendment-46-undercuts-colorado/ Ritter: Amendment 46 'undercuts Colorado']", ''Rocky Mountain News''.
- Associated Press (June 10, 2008). "[http://cbs4denver.com/local/Affirmative.Action.Measure.2.745216.html Group Opposes Anti-Affirmative Action Measure]{{dead link. (August 2017)
- Dan Hayes [http://www.minutemanhq.com/state/read.php?chapter=CO&sid=822 Denver Ballot Proposal A Success] ''The Minutemen Civil Defense Corps''
- [https://theunionnews.blogspot.com/2008/04/unions-may-lose-labor-state.html Unions may lose a labor-state] ''The Union News'', April 10, 2008
- Buescher, Bernie. (June 29, 2009). "Official Publication of the Abstract of Votes Cast for the 2008 Primary 2008 General". [[Secretary of State of Colorado]].
- Michele Moses, et al (September, 2010). "[http://www.civilrights.org/publications/colorado-46/ Investigating the Defeat of Colorado's Amendment 46: An Analysis of the Trends and Principal Factors Influencing Voter Behaviors.] {{Webarchive. link. (2011-10-13 ", Leadership Conference on Human and Civil Rights.)
- link. (2011-07-07 ")
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 2008 Colorado Amendment 46 — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report