Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
politics

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

2005 Hong Kong Chief Executive election

none


none

FieldValue
election_name2005 Hong Kong Chief Executive election
countryHong Kong
typepresidential
ongoingno
previous_election2002 Hong Kong Chief Executive election
previous_year2002
next_election2007 Hong Kong Chief Executive election
next_year2007
election_date16 June 2005
votes_for_electionAll 800 votes of the Election Committee
needed_votes401
image1[[File:Donald Tsang WEF.jpg200x200px]]
nominee1Donald Tsang
party1Nonpartisan politician
alliance1Pro-Beijing camp
electoral_vote1Uncontested
titleChief Executive
before_electionHenry Tang (acting)
before_partyNonpartisan politician
after_electionDonald Tsang
after_partyNonpartisan politician

The 2005 Hong Kong Chief Executive election was held to fill the vacancy of the territory's top office. Then Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa submitted his resignation to the central government in Beijing, and was officially approved on 12 March. As Donald Tsang, Chief Secretary for Administration in Tung's cabinet, was the only candidate, he was declared elected unopposed on 16 June. Tsang took office on 21 June to begin his first two-year term.

Background

During the 1996 and 2002 elections, an 800-member Election Committee was used to elect the Chief Executive. There is no universal suffrage or universal right to vote in Hong Kong. Senior employees, managers and professionals mainly vote pro-China to ensure their businesses can run smoothly. They were entirely biased in favour of Beijing's stance in the previous two elections.

The previously elected Tung Chee-hwa had long been an unpopular Chief executive. Tung claimed his health was deteriorating early in 2005 and announced he was ready to resign. He filed for resignation on 10 March,{{cite web |access-date=11 January 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110522031840/https://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=4513&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=20050311&sear_year=2005 |archive-date=22 May 2011

There were debates over the term of office for Tung's successor: whether the new Chief Executive should serve Tung's remaining two-year term or a full five-year term. The government tabled Chief Executive Election (Amendment) (Term of Office of the Chief Executive) Bill. Since the election and the term of the Chief Executive are regulated by the Basic Law, to settle the disputes, the Acting Chief Secretary filed a request for interpretation of the Basic Law to the PRC National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC), amidst some oppositions to the request. On 27 April, the NPCSC interpreted Article 53 that

Relevant text of the Basic Law

Article 52

Article 52 item 1 cites a health illness as an acceptable reason for resignation:

Given the status of this resignation as voluntary (as Tung claims), and there are allegations that the citing of health reasons may not be an actual truth, as there is technically nothing prohibiting the use of excuses in such a manner. It is rumoured that the actual motive is a decision imposed by the central government, but it can also be a desire to spend more time with the family or many other reasons.

Article 53

Article 53 gives the provisions for an acting Chief Executive.

This gave Donald Tsang, the Secretary of Administration at the time, the right to act as Chief Executive from 12 March to 25 May. He then had to resign, since it was illegal for him to become a candidate while acting as Chief Executive at the same time. Henry Tang, who was then Financial Secretary, filled him in according to the article. He then appointed Michael Suen as the new (acting in the interim) Chief Secretary. When Tsang was elected he was brought before the central government for approval and inauguration. The second section of Article 53 gives provisions for a new election.

The process is well defined under this clause, and Tsang's term as acting Chief Executive was limited to six months. The Chief Executive Election Ordinance defines the time as 120 days, give or take a few days, (ensuring an election on Sunday rather than on a weekday), which made 10 July the date for the election, if one had been warranted by multiple candidature.

Election Committee by-elections

Main article: 2005 Hong Kong Election Committee Subsector by-elections

In April 2005, 33 vacancies (27 from the regular constituencies, 6 from the religious sector) existed in the Election Committee. Nominations were accepted over a one-week timeframe from 9 to 15 April to fill the seats. The six empty seats in the religious sector were appointed by the religious councils. Out of the 27 seats in 16 subsectors, 12 candidates were immediately declared elected to their seats because there were no more candidates competing than the number of seats available, and hence, these ones were declared elected unopposed.

In the other seven constituencies, where 15 vacancies were present, a poll was held on 1 May, and the count was conducted smoothly with all the elected candidates expected to be entered onto the official listing of Election Committee members within the near future. The by-election was marked by voter apathy, where only 15% of the eligible population turned up, with some constituencies reporting as low as 12%, despite the pleadings of the Hong Kong Government. Only two subsectors, Agriculture and Fisheries (85%) and District Council (86%) had higher voter turnouts than one quarter.

Candidates

From 3 to 16 June nominations were open to candidates who wanted to participate in this election. The support of 100 Election Committee members is required (Ann. 1, Sect. 4, above) for nominations to be valid. Given the largely pro-China status of the Election Committee, it became common for the favoured candidate of the Chinese government to get elected unopposed. Given there were four vacancies in the EC, 697 signatures would theoretically be necessary to secure unopposed election.

Nominee

CandidateBornPartyMost recent positionCampaignwidth=100pxNominations
received
Nonpartisan}}

Withdrawn

CandidateBornPartyMost recent positionCampaignwidth=100pxNominations
received
DPHK}}
Nonpartisan}}

Other minor invalid candidates included Chan Yuet-tung, Li Hau, Allen Tam Kwan-sui, Vincent Yang Yuen-shan, Yun Shat-man.

Expressed interest but did not run

  • Emily Lau Wai-hing, convenor of The Frontier and member of the Legislative Council
  • James Tien Pei-chun, chairman of the Liberal Party and member of the Legislative Council

File:Emily Lau cropped.jpg| File:James Tien cut.jpg|

Nominations

Tsang instantly became the frontrunner in the race to succeed Tung. According to Tsang's election website, he engaged in "closed door meetings" with individual EC members. Tsang was criticised for refusing to publicly debate with the other two competitors, and was accused of stifling debate, of obstructing a free discussion within the community about his position on the issues of the day.

Beijing was accused of pressuring, and intimidating EC members to support Tsang; some EC members reportedly left Hong Kong to avoid the pressure.

On 15 June, Tsang handed in his nomination form which bore the signatures of 674 members of Election Committee. Later in the evening, the Returning Officer, Madam Justice Carlye Chu Fun Ling vetted the nomination form and determined that his nomination as a candidate in the election was valid. The other candidates failed, having garnered fewer than the required 100 backers, Tsang was declared the only valid candidate in the election. Tsang was declared elected unopposed on 16 June, gazetted by the Government on 21 June, and duly inaugurated on 24 June.

Campaign finances

During the election campaign, Donald Tsang received about HK$27.33 million sponsorship for the campaign, about 20% of which came from the businessmen from the property sector. Although Tsang stated publicly that each sponsor could not sponsor in excess of one hundred-thousand Hong Kong dollars, some of the businessmen sponsored him in different names, for example, Stanley Ho and Lee Shau Kee each sponsored HK$1 million under their family members' names. In the end Tsang used only HK$4.12 million of the sponsorship. The remaining HK$23.21 million would be donated to 14 charitable organisations.

References

References

  1. Bush, Richard C. [2005] (2005). Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait. Brookings Institution Press. {{ISBN. 0-8157-1288-X. pg 94.
  2. [http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr04-05/english/bc/bc56/reports/bc560525cb2-rpt-e.pdf Report of the Bills Committee on Chief Executive Election (Amendment) (Term of Office of the Chief Executive) Bill], Legislative Council of Hong Kong
  3. [http://www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/images/basiclawtext_doc20.pdf Interpretation of Paragraph 2, Article 53 of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress]
  4. HK basic law web pdf. "[http://www.info.gov.hk/basic_law/fulltext/Basic_Law.pdf HK basic law]." ''The Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative region of the People's Republic of China.'' Retrieved on 8 January 2007.
  5. (30 March 2005). "香港民主黨決定派人參選特首". RFA.
  6. link. (11 February 2010 , Ohmynews)
  7. ''[[The Standard (Hong Kong). link. (22 May 2011 , ''The Standard'', 26 May 2005)
  8. [http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200506/15/06150310.htm Nomination for Chief Executive Election ruled valid], Hong Kong government press release, 15 Jun 2005. Retrieved 20 February 2007.
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about 2005 Hong Kong Chief Executive election — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report