Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
politics

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

1995 Croatian parliamentary election

none


none

FieldValue
countryCroatia
previous_election1992
next_election2000
seats_for_electionAll 127 seats in the Chamber of Representatives
majority_seats64
turnout68.79% ( 6.82pp)
election_date29 October 1995
party1Croatian Democratic Union
leader1Franjo Tuđman
last_election185
seats175
percentage145.23
party2HSS–HNS–IDS
leader2Zlatko Tomčić
last_election213
seats218
percentage218.26
party3Croatian Social Liberal Party
leader3Dražen Budiša
last_election314
seats312
percentage311.55
party4Social Democratic Party of Croatia
leader4Ivica Račan
last_election411
seats410
percentage48.93
party5Croatian Party of Rights
leader5Anto Đapić
last_election55
seats54
percentage55.01
heading6Minority lists
party6Serb People's Party (Croatia)leader6 = Milan Đukićpercentage6= 60.60last_election6 = 3seats6 = 2
party7Social Democratic Action of Croatialeader7 =percentage7 = 34.34last_election7 = Newseats7 = 1
party8Independentsleader8 =percentage8 = –last_election8 = 4seats8 = 4
map1995 Croatian election map.svg
map_captionResult by constituency
Voting was not held in the eastern territory still under control of the Republic of Serbian Krajina (in dark gray)
titlePrime Minister
posttitleSubsequent Prime Minister
before_electionNikica Valentić
before_partyCroatian Democratic Union
after_electionZlatko Mateša
after_partyCroatian Democratic Union

Voting was not held in the eastern territory still under control of the Republic of Serbian Krajina (in dark gray)

Parliamentary elections were held in Croatia on 29 October 1995 to elect the 127 members of the Chamber of Representatives. The election was held in conjunction with special elections for Zagreb City Assembly, which resulted in the Zagreb Crisis.

The result was a victory for the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ), which won an absolute majority of 75 seats. Voter turnout was 69%.

This was the last election to date in Croatia in which a single party won enough seats to govern alone without the need for parliamentary support from pre-election or post-election coalition partners.

Background

The term of the existing Chamber of Representatives was to expire one year later, in 1996. However, the Croatian government of Franjo Tuđman and his Croatian Democratic Union party hoped to exploit national euphoria over the success of Operation Storm. The Chamber of Representatives was quickly dissolved, but not before passing yet another piece of electoral legislation, introducing a new voting system which was to improve chances of the ruling party.

According to the new electoral law, 32 seats were won in individual constituencies on First past the post basis, while 80 seats were to be distributed on the basis of proportional representation, with the threshold being raised from previous 2% to 5%.

Another addition was a raised threshold for lists of party coalitions - 8% for coalition of two parties and 11% for coalition of three and more parties. It is more than obvious that the new rules were introduced to discourage coalitions of small opposition parties and subsequently have their votes dispersed and wasted below the threshold, allowing the stronger party to get additional seats.

While 12 seats were kept for Croatian expatriates, the number of seats reserved for ethnic minorities have changed. This was most evident in the case of Serbs, who had only 3 seats compared with the previous 11.

Under such conditions, opposition parties were more concerned about their own political survival than actually challenging the ruling party. Learning from their mistakes during the 1992 elections, they created ad hoc coalitions and circumvented electoral thresholds by fielding other parties' members as their own candidates on the lists.

Results

The HDZ received a similar percentage of vote and number of seats as three years earlier. More significant changes were among the ranks of the opposition; the Social Democratic Party re-emerged as a significant political factor with 9% of the vote, at the expense of the Croatian Social Liberal Party, which saw its vote share almost halved. Neither party was as successful as the large opposition coalition which included the Croatian Peasant Party, the Croatian People's Party and the Istrian Democratic Assembly.

The most tense moment of the campaign occurred during the vote count. It appeared that the Croatian Party of Rights would fail to break the 5% threshold, only for the vote to increase afterwards.

Subsequent changes

The following changes happened after elections:

  • The Croatian Pure Party of Rights gained one member of parliament
  • The Croatian Christian Democratic Union gained one more member of parliament
  • The Serb People's Party lost one member of parliament
  • The Independent Democratic Serb Party gained one member of parliament
  • The Liberal Party gained four members of parliament
  • The Istrian Democratic Forum gained one member of parliament
  • The Croatian Independent Democrats lost one member of parliament
  • Social Democratic Action of Croatia lost one member of parliament

Notes

References

References

  1. [[Dieter Nohlen]] & Philip Stöver (2010) ''Elections in Europe: A data handbook'', p410 {{ISBN. 978-3-8329-5609-7
  2. Nohlen & Stöver, p415
  3. (16 October 2010). "Davor Butković: Prva hrvatska Vlada koja bi mogla pasti".
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about 1995 Croatian parliamentary election — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report