1994 Karamay fire

Building design

The Friendship Theatre was built in 1958 following Soviet architecture, renovated starting in 1989 and reentered operation in December 1991. The building had three floors and was originally designed with a capacity of 796 people. The renovation increased it to 810. The soundproofing material was made of asbestos and polyurethane; the curtains were made of cotton. In certain positions, the spotlight was only at a distance of 20 cm from the stage curtains. Due to a lack of awareness on fire safety, the refurbishments of the theatre introduced many flammable objects, such as the seats, which due to being made from artificial fibres, burned well, spread out toxic gasses and proved fatal in the fire to many people.

A prior fire had occurred in the building, also as a result of burning a stage curtain with the spotlights; the curtain was electronically lowered, and the fire was able to be put out.

The fire

On 8 December 1994, 500 schoolchildren were taken to a special variety performance at a theatre in Karamay at Friendship Theatre (友谊馆). Most were aged between 7 and 14. At 18:10, a spotlight aimed too close at the curtains overheated the curtains, igniting the curtains towards the rear of the stage. By 18:20, a student in the second row noticed a burning smell; while the stage workers had realised the seriousness, much of the audience believed that it was part of the special effects and remained seated. Unlike the previous fire, the two electricians who operated the curtains were not available, being on a business trip to Ürümqi. Eventually, the main stage curtains were closed, concealing the fire from the audience; the fire was starved of oxygen, though it continued to burn, eventually burning through the electrical wiring and causing a blackout in the theatre. The students, who had previously remained seated started panicking to exit the theatre. At some point after the blackout, the supporting frame for the stage curtains collapsed, causing oxygen to rush into the previously starved fire, creating a backdraft reaching up to 1200 °C at 60 ATM.

First response consisted of four fire brigade trucks, however, the firefighters who arrived on scene first did not have proper respiratory equipment and thus struggled in the toxic environment, resulting in 27 injuries to firefighters due to the smoke. The fire crews also lacked powered equipment, with each fire truck having only one fire axe; the fire pump pressure around the hall was also lacking. The dry powder fire extinguishers in the theatre, though potent against chemical fires, were wholly useless against the fire, high up in the curtains.

"Let the officials leave first"

In 1995, the China Youth Daily was the first to have reported that somebody had asked the students 'let the officials leave first' (让领导先走). The phrase has since become a catch phrase, meaning the government officials have priority over ordinary folks in times of emergency. As such, this fire remains the most notorious fire in China.

Online articles identified the official as Kuang Li (况丽), the vice-director of the state petroleum company's local education centre, without official confirmation of this. By the time the leaders had filed out of the only open emergency exit, the other exits remained locked, preventing many teachers and pupils from escaping.

Other survivors agreed that while 'let the leaders go first' was indeed said, it was spoken at the beginning of the performance, as a manner of respect to them when the performance ends and China Youth Daily took the original sentence out of context. Notably, in the documentary Karamay, in an interview conducted in the hospital immediately after the fire, none of the interviewees spoke about the students being instructed to let the leaders go first.

The Guangxi Fire Department has argued that the evacuation issues were caused by panic, with people trying to escape through the doors from which they entered instead of the less crowded doors E and F. Additionally, the anti-robbery bars installed significantly hampered evacuation through windows and other doors.

Fatalities and justice

A total of 325 deaths were reported, with 288 of them being school children. Out of 25 officials, 17 died at the scene.

In 1995, 300 families of the dead and injured sent representatives to the National People's Congress in Beijing, supposedly the venue for Chinese citizens to seek justice and a fair hearing. They were led off by security guards to a walled government compound, where five buses took them back to the airport. The group were then escorted through special channels to a plane bound for Xinjiang.

A court convicted a total of 13 people. Four of them, senior officials, were convicted of dereliction of duty and sentenced up to five years in prison. Others were convicted of lesser crimes while Zhao Zheng was acquitted.

Families received compensation of up to 50,589 yuan. One week after the fire, city officials in Karamay announced plans to demolish the burned out Friendship Theater. This plan was quickly scrapped following protests by residents of Karamay and parents of the deceased children. Three years later, in September 1997, the theater portion of the building was torn down, leaving only the front hall. This unmarked memorial still stands in what is now the People's Park in the center of Karamay.

There is no plaque or memorial anywhere in Karamay that references the deadly fire.

In popular culture

Popular Chinese folk singer Zhou Yunpeng (周云蓬) has compiled a list of Chinese man-made disasters and turned it into a song, and the Karamay fire incident was mentioned in the song, as was the internet catch phrase, "Let the officials walk out first." (让领导先走)

References

References

1. (10 December 1994). "China Orders Safety Study After Fire Kills 300". [[The New York Times]].
2. "China aghast at 'sacrifice' of 288 pupils". [[The Times]].
3. (8 May 2007). "China 1994 fire killed 288 pupils as officials fled-expose". [[Reuters]].
4. "克拉玛依公布首批六处市级保护文物单位(组图)_新闻中心_新浪网".
5. "从克拉玛依友谊馆火灾论建筑的设计和管理问题".
6. 网易. (2018-12-10). "事件消防：克拉玛依大火启示录".
7. 雷, 进德. "克拉玛依大火难". 河南消防.
8. 麻, 庭光. "克拉玛依大火之谜". CHINESE SOCIETY FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY JOURNALISM.
9. 刘冰, 刘光牛. 人祸猛于火——克拉玛依"12·8"惨案的警示. 河南教育 (中国青年报). 1995-01-10 [http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/article/TECH505.028.htm Archived] 2012-12-14]. Note: the original text was '同学们，让领导先走......', 'students, let the officials leave first...'
10. "17年后，再看"让领导先走"_评论频道_腾讯网".
11. Xu, Xin. "Karamay".
12. 刘冰, 刘光牛. [http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/article/TECH505.028.htm 人祸猛于火——克拉玛依"12·8"惨案的警示]. 河南教育 (中国青年报). 1995-01-10 [2012-12-14]. ([https://web.archive.org/web/20150816234522/http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/article/TECH505.028.htm Archived] on 2015-08-16)
13. 潘丽. [http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95651X/199602/2087076.html 从克拉玛依友谊馆火灾论建筑的设计和管理问题]. 建筑知识. 1996, (2) [2012-12-17]. (Archived 2013-12-11)
14. (2016-04-05). "案例全文页-标准显示模式".
15. (3 December 2019). "Karamay Fire 1994: The Real Story Behind China's Worst Fire Disaster".
16. Wang, Jingyi (Veronica). (12 May 2020). "From Rebellion to Erasure: The Rise and Fall of Urban Folk Rocker Li Zhi". Made in China Journal.