From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
1991 Louisiana gubernatorial election
none
none
Field
Value
election_name
1991 Louisiana gubernatorial election
country
Louisiana
type
presidential
ongoing
no
previous_election
1987 Louisiana gubernatorial election
previous_year
1987
election_date
October 19, 1991 (first round)
November 16, 1991 (runoff)
next_election
1995 Louisiana gubernatorial election
next_year
1995
flag_year
1912
1blank
First round
2blank
Runoff
image1
File:Edwin Edwards (1986) (cropped).png
image_size
x150px
candidate1
Edwin Edwards
party1
Democratic Party (United States)
1data1
**523,096
33.76%**
2data1
**1,057,031
61.17%**
image2
File:David Duke.jpg
candidate2
David Duke
party2
Republican Party (United States)
1data2
**491,342
31.71%**
2data2
671,009
38.83%
image4
File:Buddy Roemer Congress.jpg
candidate4
Buddy Roemer
party4
Republican Party (United States)
1data4
410,690
26.51%
2data4
Eliminated
image5
File:Clyde C. Holloway.jpg
candidate5
Clyde C. Holloway
party5
Republican Party (United States)
1data5
82,683
5.34%
2data5
Eliminated
map
map_caption
Edwards:
Duke:
Roemer:
title
Governor
before_election
Buddy Roemer
before_party
Republican Party (United States)
after_election
Edwin Edwards
after_party
Democratic Party (United States)
November 16, 1991 (runoff)
33.76%**
61.17%**
31.71%**
38.83%
26.51%
5.34%
Duke: Roemer:
The 1991 Louisiana gubernatorial election resulted in the election of Democrat Edwin Edwards to his fourth non-consecutive term as governor of Louisiana. The election received national and international attention due to the unexpectedly strong showing of David Duke, a former Grand Wizard of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, who had ties to other white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups. Incumbent Republican Governor Buddy Roemer, who had switched from the Democratic to Republican Party during his term, ran for re-election to a second term but was eliminated in the first round of voting.
Background
In 1991, all elections in Louisiana except U.S. presidential elections followed a variation of the open primary system called the jungle primary. Candidates of all parties are listed on one ballot; voters need not limit themselves to the candidates of one party. Unless one candidate takes 50% or more of the vote in the first round, a run-off election is then held between the top two candidates, who may be members of the same party. In this election, the first round of voting was held on October 19, 1991, and the runoff was held on November 16. In 1990, Duke mounted a campaign for the U.S. Senate, losing to incumbent Democrat J. Bennett Johnston. Leading Republicans repudiated Duke's candidacy, citing his history as a white supremacist.
Public Service Commissioner Kathleen Blanco, a Democrat, announced her candidacy in May 1991. Edwards was not impressed by her entry. It was the first time in 40 years a woman had seriously run for Governor but Edwards surmised she would not get out of single digits. Blanco, who came from Acadiana, could have complicated Edwards' bid for a fourth term but after 100 days she suddenly withdrew and ran for Public Service Commissioner again. Blanco would later be elected governor in her own right in 2003.
Meanwhile, Governor Roemer was facing a potential opponent for the Republican support who could have denied him major party support he needed to stave off Holloway and Duke. Another prominent party-switcher, Secretary of State Fox McKeithen, who withdrew from a 1990 U.S. Senate bid, actively explored a gubernatorial bid. His father, former Governor John McKeithen, would prove to be a strong asset had he run, but in the end, McKeithen figured that his time had come and gone and ran for reelection as Secretary of State.
Primary election
After the withdrawal of Blanco and McKeithen, the field of candidates began to solidify. Then late in March, incumbent Governor Buddy Roemer changed his party affiliation from Democrat to Republican, dismaying many members of both parties. One irate Republican was the state party chairman, Billy Nungesser of New Orleans. After failing to get the Louisiana Republicans' endorsement convention canceled, Roemer announced he would skip the event. The convention, as expected, endorsed U.S. Representative Clyde C. Holloway, the favored candidate of the anti-abortion forces in the state, with whom Roemer was at odds at the time.
The first round primary gubernatorial contest included Roemer, Edwin Edwards, David Duke, and Eighth District Congressman Holloway who all ran in Louisiana's open primary. Roemer was wounded by his mistakes as governor, while Edwards and Duke each had a passionate core group of supporters. Roemer placed third in the primary. One of the contributing factors to his defeat was a last-minute advertising barrage by Marine Shale owner Jack Kent; Marine Shale had been targeted by the Roemer administration as a polluter, and Kent spent $500,000 of his own money in the closing days of the campaign to purchase anti-Roemer commercials.
Results
First voting round, October 19
1991 Louisiana gubernatorial election
Party
Candidate
Votes
%
Total
1,549,255
100
Democratic
Edwin Edwards
523,096
33.76
Republican
David Duke
491,342
31.71
Republican
Buddy Roemer (incumbent)
410,690
26.51
Republican
Clyde C. Holloway
82,683
5.34
Democratic
Sam S. Jones
11,847
0.76
Other
Ed Karst
9,663
0.62
Democratic
Fred Dent
7,385
0.48
Republican
Anne Thompson
4,118
0.27
Democratic
Jim Crowley
4,000
0.26
Democratic
Albert Powell
2,053
0.13
Other
Ronnie Johnson
1,372
0.09
Democratic
Cousin Ken Lewis
1,006
0.06
Runoff election
Campaign
Faced with the alternative of David Duke, many Louisianans who were otherwise critical of Edwards now looked favorably on him as an alternative. This included Buddy Roemer, who ran on an "Anyone but Edwards" platform during his successful 1987 campaign. He ended up endorsing Edwards rather than Duke, who was the putative Republican candidate.
The resulting runoff campaign was widely seen as one of the dirtiest and most negative campaigns in recent history. Edwards and his supporters seized on Duke's record as a white supremacist; Duke responded by claiming to be a born-again Christian who had renounced racism and anti-Semitism after his conversion.
Nearly the entire Republican leadership rejected Duke's candidacy. In a news conference, President George H. W. Bush condemned Duke as unfit for public office, stating:
When someone has a long record, an ugly record, of racism and bigotry, that record simply cannot be erased by the glib rhetoric of a political campaign. So I believe David Duke is an insincere charlatan. I believe he's attempting to hoodwink the voters of Louisiana. I believe he should be rejected for what he is and what he stands for.
Humorous unofficial bumper stickers were created in support of Edwards over Duke, despite Edwards' negative reputation. One bumper sticker read "Vote for the Lizard, not the Wizard", while another read "Vote For The Crook: It's Important."
Debate
The runoff debate, held on November 6, 1991, received significant attention when reporter Norman Robinson questioned Duke. Robinson, who is African-American, told Duke that he was "scared" at the prospect of his winning the election because of his history of "diabolical, evil, vile" racist and anti-Semitic comments, some of which he read to Duke. He then pressed Duke for an apology. When Duke protested that Robinson was not being fair to him, Robinson replied that he did not think Duke was being honest. Jason Berry of the Los Angeles Times called it "startling TV" and the "catalyst" for the "overwhelming" turnout of black voters that helped former Governor Edwin Edwards defeat Duke.
Results
Runoff, November 16
1991 Louisiana gubernatorial election runoff
Party
Candidate
Votes
%
Total
1,728,040
100
Democratic
Edwin Edwards
1,057,031
61.17
Republican
David Duke
671,009
38.83
Majority
386,022
22.34
Democratic gain from Republican
Runoff results by parish
Parish
Edwin Washington Edwards
Democratic
David Ernest Duke
Republican
Margin
Total votes cast
#
%
#
%
#
%
Totals
1,057,031
61.17%
671,009
38.83%
386,022
22.34%
1,728,040
Acadia
14,928
60.44%
9,772
39.56%
5,156
20.88%
24,700
Allen
6,171
60.46%
4,036
39.54%
2,135
20.92%
10,207
Ascension
14,792
53.48%
12,867
46.52%
1,925
6.96%
27,659
Assumption
6,488
59.67%
4,385
40.33%
2,103
19.34%
10,873
Avoyelles
9,044
53.72%
7,792
46.28%
1,252
7.44%
16,836
Beauregard
5,565
46.70%
6,351
53.30%
786
6.60%
11,916
Bienville
4,685
59.30%
3,216
40.70%
1,469
18.60%
7,901
Bossier
14,536
50.14%
14,457
49.86%
79
0.28%
28,993
Caddo
59,933
64.08%
33,591
35.92%
26,342
28.16%
93,524
Calcasieu
40,617
65.71%
21,193
34.29%
19,424
31.42%
61,810
Caldwell
2,112
37.04%
3,590
62.96%
1,478
15.92%
5,702
Cameron
2,669
64.75%
1,453
35.25%
1,216
19.50%
4,122
Catahoula
2,815
44.79%
3,470
55.21%
655
10.42%
6,285
Claiborne
4,329
57.70%
3,174
42.30%
1,155
15.40%
7,503
Concordia
4,544
47.41%
5,040
52.59%
496
5.18%
9,584
De Soto
6,607
59.11%
4,571
40.89%
2,036
18.22%
11,178
East Baton Rouge
100,138
66.41%
50,656
33.59%
49,482
32.82%
150,794
East Carroll
3,017
68.98%
1,357
31.02%
1,660
37.96%
4,374
East Feliciana
4,949
59.55%
3,362
40.45%
1,587
19.10%
8,311
Evangeline
8,947
54.50%
7,470
45.50%
1,477
9.00%
16,417
Franklin
4,410
41.65%
6,179
58.35%
1,769
16.70%
10,589
Grant
3,516
43.86%
4,500
56.14%
984
12.28%
8,016
Iberia
16,594
56.43%
12,814
43.57%
3,780
12.86%
29,408
Iberville
10,693
64.56%
5,870
35.44%
4,823
29.12%
16,563
Jackson
3,345
44.49%
4,173
55.51%
828
11.02%
7,518
Jefferson
102,261
59.30%
70,183
40.70%
32,078
18.60%
172,444
Jefferson Davis
8,581
63.79%
4,870
36.21%
3,711
27.58%
13,451
Lafayette
40,816
64.63%
22,336
35.37%
18,480
29.26%
63,152
Lafourche
21,346
59.29%
14,655
40.71%
6,691
18.58%
36,001
LaSalle
2,432
33.12%
4,910
66.88%
2,478
33.76%
7,342
Lincoln
9,382
61.22%
5,943
38.78%
3,439
22.44%
15,325
Livingston
12,152
39.58%
18,554
60.42%
6,402
20.84%
30,706
Madison
3,582
61.04%
2,286
38.96%
1,296
22.08%
5,868
Morehouse
6,517
47.30%
7,261
52.70%
744
5.60%
13,778
Natchitoches
8,870
58.24%
6,360
41.76%
2,510
16.48%
15,230
Orleans
173,744
87.02%
25,921
12.98%
147,823
74.04%
199,665
Ouachita
26,137
49.45%
26,722
50.55%
585
1.10%
52,859
Plaquemines
6,689
55.79%
5,301
44.21%
1,388
11.58%
11,990
Pointe Coupee
7,430
61.32%
4,687
38.68%
2,743
22.64%
12,117
Rapides
27,638
55.95%
21,762
44.05%
5,876
11.90%
49,400
Red River
2,674
53.34%
2,339
46.66%
335
6.68%
5,013
Richland
3,970
43.39%
5,179
56.61%
1,209
13.22%
9,149
Sabine
4,635
46.88%
5,251
53.12%
616
6.24%
9,886
St. Bernard
14,394
44.23%
18,153
55.77%
3,759
11.54%
32,547
St. Charles
12,680
61.66%
7,885
38.34%
4,795
23.32%
20,565
St. Helena
3,700
60.18%
2,448
39.82%
1,252
20.36%
6,148
St. James
8,028
66.34%
4,074
33.66%
3,954
32.68%
12,102
St. John the Baptist
11,993
64.21%
6,685
35.79%
5,308
28.42%
18,678
St. Landry
23,362
61.34%
14,725
38.66%
8,637
22.68%
38,087
St. Martin
12,726
64.20%
7,095
35.80%
5,631
28.40%
19,821
St. Mary
15,039
61.42%
9,447
38.58%
5,592
22.84%
24,486
St. Tammany
32,678
55.88%
25,800
44.12%
6,878
11.76%
58,478
Tangipahoa
18,779
53.28%
16,469
46.72%
2,310
6.56%
35,248
Tensas
1,993
58.84%
1,394
41.16%
599
17.68%
3,387
Terrebonne
19,799
59.17%
13,662
40.83%
6,137
18.34%
33,461
Union
4,029
40.09%
6,020
59.91%
1,991
19.82%
10,049
Vermillion
14,477
64.75%
7,882
35.25%
6,595
29.50%
22,359
Vernon
6,676
49.33%
6,856
50.67%
180
1.31%
13,532
Washington
9,157
46.40%
10,577
53.60%
1,420
7.20%
19,734
Webster
9,024
51.77%
8,406
48.23%
618
3.54%
17,430
West Baton Rouge
6,016
59.52%
4,092
40.48%
1,024
19.04%
10,108
West Carroll
1,625
31.12%
3,596
68.88%
1,971
37.76%
5,221
West Feliciana
2,896
64.47%
1,596
35.53%
1,300
28.94%
4,492
Winn
3,660
46.05%
4,288
53.95%
628
7.90%
7,948
Analysis
Edwards' large victory was credited to his almost unanimous support from black voters, who had a turnout of 80%. He also won 75% of voters who supported Roemer. 63% of female voters and 59% of male voters supported Edwards. Duke received 56% of white voters with family incomes under $15,000, 63% of those with incomes between $15,000 and $29,999, and 60% of those with incomes between $30,000 and $49,999. 51% of white voters with family incomes between $50,000 and $74,999 and 66% with incomes above $75,000 supported Edwards.
This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.