From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
1964 West German presidential election
None
None
| Field | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| election_name | 1964 West German presidential election | |
| country | Germany | |
| type | presidential | |
| ongoing | no | |
| previous_election | 1959 West German presidential election | |
| previous_year | 1959 | |
| next_election | 1969 West German presidential election | |
| next_year | 1969 | |
| 1blank | Nominators | |
| election_date | 1 July 1964 | |
| image1 | [[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1994-034-22A, Heinrich Lübke.jpg | 150x150px]] |
| nominee1 | Heinrich Lübke | |
| 1data1 | CDU/CSU, SPD | |
| party1 | Christian Democratic Union (Germany) | |
| electoral_vote1 | 710 | |
| image2 | [[File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F017420-0020, Bucher, Ewald cropped.jpg | 150x150px]] |
| nominee2 | Ewald Bucher | |
| party2 | Free Democratic Party (Germany) | |
| 1data2 | FDP | |
| electoral_vote2 | 123 | |
| title | President | |
| before_election | Heinrich Lübke | |
| before_party | Christian Democratic Union (Germany) | |
| after_election | Heinrich Lübke | |
| after_party | Christian Democratic Union (Germany) |
An indirect presidential election (officially the 4th Federal Convention) was held in West Germany on 1 July 1964. President Heinrich Lübke was renominated by the Christian Democratic Union. The Free Democratic Party nominated justice minister Ewald Bucher. The Social Democratic Party was divided. The official party line was that they supported President Lübke's re-election. Some have speculated this was a first move towards the grand-coalition that brought Kurt Kiesinger to power two years later. However, the high number of abstentions seems to indicate that not all members of the SPD caucus agreed with this move, as does the fact that Ewald Bucher received at least 19 votes from outside his own party.
Composition of the Federal Convention
The president is elected by the Federal Convention consisting of all the members of the Bundestag and an equal number of delegates representing the states. These are divided proportionally by population to each state, and each state's delegation is divided among the political parties represented in its parliament so as to reflect the partisan proportions in the parliament.
| By party | By state | Party | Members | State | Members |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDU/CSU | 485 | Bundestag | 521 | ||
| SPD | 445 | Baden-Württemberg | 73 | ||
| FDP | 104 | Bavaria | 89 | ||
| BP | 3 | Berlin | 20 | ||
| GB/BHE | 2 | Bremen | 6 | ||
| SVP | 1 | Hamburg | 17 | ||
| DPS | 1 | Hesse | 45 | ||
| Independents | 1 | Lower Saxony | 61 | ||
| Total | 1042 | North Rhine-Westphalia | 147 | ||
| Rhineland-Palatinate | 32 | ||||
| Saarland | 10 | ||||
| Schleswig-Holstein | 21 | ||||
| Total | 1042 |
Source: Eine Dokumentation aus Anlass der Wahl des Bundespräsidenten am 18. März 2012
Results
| Candidate | Parties | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heinrich Lübke | CDU/CSU, SPD | 710 | 68.1 |
| Ewald Bucher | FDP | 123 | 11.8 |
| Abstentions | 187 | 17.9 | |
| Invalid votes | 4 | 0.4 | |
| Not present | 18 | 1.7 | |
| Total | 1,042 | 100 | |
| Source: Bundestag |
References
References
- (2 July 1964). "Man in the News; Tenacious President; Heinrich Lubke". The New York Times.
- (1998). "Keeping Weimar at Bay: The German Federal Presidency since 1949". German Politics & Society.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 1964 West German presidential election — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report