Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
politics

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

1902 Tasmania by-election


FieldValue
election_name1902 Tasmania by-election
candidate5Charles Hall
previous_year1901
previous_election1901 Australian federal election
ongoingno
typeParliamentary
after_partyFree Trade Party
candidate4John McCall
party4Protectionist Party
next_election1903 Australian federal election
party5Independent
percentage417.07%
percentage54.01%
popular_vote42,051
popular_vote5482
image2
image5
image4
election_date26 March 1902
next_year1903
popular_vote16,956
party2Labour
after_electionWilliam Hartnoll
before_partyFree Trade Party
before_electionFrederick William Piesse
titleMP
percentage221.02%
popular_vote22,525
candidate2James Whitelaw
turnout12,115 (30.47%)
percentage157.90%
party1Free Trade Party
countryAustralia
image1William Hartnoll.jpg
candidate1William Hartnoll
seats_for_electionThe Tasmania seat in the House of Representatives
registered39,762

Results

|reg. electors = 39,762

Aftermath

William Hartnoll was elected in the by-election, receiving nearly 58 per cent of the vote. When opposition leader George Reid received a telegram from the Freetrade Association of Launceston informing him of Hartnoll's impending victory, he proclaimed "Thanks! Hartnoll's triumph overshadows the inevitable fate of the Barton ministry."

Hartnoll's election was not without controversy. Under Tasmanian law, nominations from candidates were required to be signed by the candidate himself. Hartnoll's nomination paper was received and accepted by the Commonwealth electoral officer via telegram, and was not signed. J.C. Whitelaw, one of Hartnoll's opponents in the by-election, challenged the election on legal grounds, and instructed his solicitors in Melbourne to lodge a petition and a deposit of £100 to the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The petition was referred by the Prime Minister Edmund Barton to the Elections and Qualifications Committee of the House of Representatives. After hearing the evidence, committee chair Sir Edward Braddon announced that the committee had found that Hartnoll had "committed an irregularity" by nominating via telegram, but that it was not considered a sufficient reason for disturbing the election.

References

References

  1. (28 March 1902). "The Tasmanian Election". Western Mail.
  2. (21 April 1902). "Mr. Hartnoll's Seat – Petition by Mr. Whitelaw". The Examiner.
  3. (30 May 1902). "The Disputed Tasmanian Election – Finding of the Committee". The Advertiser.
Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about 1902 Tasmania by-election — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report