Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
sports

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

1902 LSU Tigers football team

American college football season

1902 LSU Tigers football team

American college football season

FieldValue
year1902
teamLSU Tigers
sportfootball
imageLSU Football 1902 team-1.jpg
image_size285
conferenceSouthern Intercollegiate Athletic Association
short_confSIAA
record6–1
conf_record5–1
head_coachW. S. Borland
hc_year2nd
captainHenry E. Landry
stadiumState Field
championSIAA co-champion

The 1902 LSU Tigers football team represented the Tigers of Louisiana State University during the 1902 Southern Intercollegiate Athletic Association football season. W. S. Borland returned in 1902 for his second season as LSU head coach. The seven-game 1902 season was the longest for the Tigers since their first game in 1893 and also featured the most games on the road: five games played away and only two in Baton Rouge. Despite a single conference loss to Vanderbilt, the 1902 LSU team claimed an SIAA co-championship with Clemson.

Schedule

|{{CFB schedule entry | w/l = w |{{CFB schedule entry | w/l = w |{{CFB schedule entry | w/l = w |{{CFB schedule entry | w/l = w |{{CFB schedule entry | w/l = l |{{CFB schedule entry | w/l = w |{{CFB schedule entry | w/l = w

Game summaries

Texas

In one of the season's "liveliest games" in San Antonio, LSU upset Texas 4–0, using its speed and teamwork.

Auburn

Players near the goal line in 1902 LSU vs. Auburn game at State Field

LSU beat Auburn in a hard-fought game 5–0. Captain Henry Landry scored the game's only touchdown. "Nearly every business house in Baton Rouge closed at noon and everybody went to the game". The trip to Louisiana made some Auburn players sick.

The starting lineup was Gueno (left end), Guldry (left tackle), Leseur (left guard), Sharp (center), Klock (right guard), Rhodes (right tackle), Martin (right end), Coleman (quarterback), Mundinger (left halfback), Kennedy (right halfback), Landry (fullback).

Vanderbilt

  • The Nashville Banner gave this report on the Monday, November 17 game in Baton Rouge against LSU:

"Vanderbilt defeated Louisiana State University, 27 to 5, yesterday. It was an ideal day and about 1,000 people witnessed the game. A place kick only saved Louisiana State University from a whitewash. The game was lacking in interest, for Vanderbilt displayed her superiority so strongly that Louisiana was outclassed.

"Louisiana State University kicked off and Vanderbilt advanced the ball steadily for a touch-down. This was repeated, Tigert making the two touchdowns. Louisiana State University got the ball only once in the first half and lost on downs. At the end of the half the score stood 11 to 0.

"Vanderbilt kicked off and Louisiana State University lost on downs in the second half. The visitors advanced the ball for a touchdown. Davis failed, in kicking a goal. Louisiana State University seemed to be very weak. Vanderbilt made her gains every time, and only lost the ball on fumbles. Louisiana State University never advanced far before losing on downs, they were entirely outclassed in weight and skill. It is hard to say who were the star players for Vanderbilt. Every man played a good game. The playing of Edgerton, Davis, Tigert, and Lawler deserves special notice. For Louisiana State University the playing of Sales, deserves notice.

"The Vanderbilt boys are sore over the treatment they received. The Louisiana State University team couldn't take defeat in a sportsmanlike manner. They claimed that Vanderbilt knew their signals and made uncomplimentary remarks from their sidelines, and altogether the treatment was not as good as the team expected. Vanderbilt played a harder game than at Tulane, and Louisiana State University has a much better team than Tulane. Vanderbilt played a much faster game than Louisiana State University and every trick was a success. Louisiana State University depended entirely on straight football and never succeeded in working any trick.

"The teams were entertained with an elegant dinner after the game by Mr. W. P. Connell, and the University Athletic Association invited the two teams to a theatre party."

Alabama

Landry scored both touchdowns in an 11–0 defeat of Alabama to close the season.

References

References

  1. (October 17, 1902). "L.S.U. defeats the Industrial Institute at football". The Times-Democrat.
  2. (October 19, 1902). "The Varsity defeated, the Louisiana boys won by a score of 4 to 0". Austin Daily Statesman.
  3. (October 28, 1920). "L. S. U. 5, Auburns 0". The Times-Democrat.
  4. (October 28, 1902). "Louisiana State Downs Red Haired Auburnites". Atlanta Constitution.
  5. (November 9, 1902). "Giants on gridiron; Mississippians lose in hotly contested game". The Times-Democrat.
  6. (November 18, 1902). "Vanderbilt victors; State University is defeated by score of 27 to 5". The Times-Democrat.
  7. (November 28, 1902). "L.S.U. wins good game - Louisianans defeat Mississippi A. and M. team by score of 6 to 0". The Times-Democrat.
  8. (November 30, 1902). "Result of the last game of the season was 11 to 0". The Tuskaloosa Gazette.
  9. (October 19, 1902). "Louisiana 4, Texas 0". The Courier-Journal.
  10. (October 28, 1920). "L. S. U. 5, Auburns 0". The Times-Democrat.
  11. (October 28, 1902). "Louisiana State Downs Red Haired Auburnites". Atlanta Constitution.
  12. (November 16, 1902). "Clemson Wins From Auburn". Atlanta Constitution.
  13. "Archived copy".
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about 1902 LSU Tigers football team — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report