Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/chess-endgames

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Réti endgame study

Chess endgame study with king and pawn versus king and pawn

Réti endgame study

Chess endgame study with king and pawn versus king and pawn

[[Image:Chess kll45.svg]][[Image:Chess pll45.svg]][[Image:Chess kdl45.svg]][[Image:Chess pdl45.svg]]
Richard Réti

The Réti endgame study is a chess endgame study by Richard Réti. It was published in 1921 in Kagans Neueste Schachnachrichten. It demonstrates how a king can make multiple threats and how it can take more than one path to a given location, using the same number of moves. It is covered in many books on the endgame (see chess endgame literature). The procedure is known as the "Réti Maneuver" or "Réti's Idea". Endgame composer Abram Gurvich called the theme "The Hunt of Two Hares" and it appears in many other studies and games. It is also called "chasing two birds at once".

The study

|tright |Richard Réti, 1921 | | | | | | | |kl | | | | | | | | |kd| |pl| | | | | | | | | | | | |pd | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |White to play and draw White is to move and draw in this position. At first inspection, it appears that White has no hope in drawing. His king is well outside the square of the black pawn (see ) and the king is a long way from supporting his own pawn. However, White can draw by making king moves that have dual purposes. One goal is getting in the square of the black pawn, so it can be intercepted, and the other is getting to the d6-square to support the promotion of his own pawn.

The black king will have to spend two tempi to stop the white pawn from promoting, and this is the number of tempi the white king needs to gain in order to get into the square of the black pawn.

|tright |de la Villa, page 179 | | | | |x4|x2|x1|kl | | | | |x5|x2|x1|x1 | | |pl|x9|x3|x1|x2|x2 | | | | |x1|x3|x5|x4 | | | | | |xo| | | | | | | | |xo| | | | | | | | |xo | | | | | | | | |Number of ways for the white king to get to squares in the minimum number of moves The second diagram shows the number of ways that the white king can get to various squares in the minimum number of moves. There are nine ways to get to d6, but only one of them allows him to get into the square of the black pawn.

The solution is for the white king to follow the path on the diagonal marked by "1" and then follow the dots to intercept the black pawn (if necessary): :1. Kg7 h4 1...Kb6 transposes.

:2. Kf6 Kb6 Black has to spend a tempo on preventing the white king from reaching his pawn. If 2...h3 then 3.Ke7 h2 4.c7 Kb7 5.Kd7 and both pawns promote, with a drawn position.

:3. Ke5! Kxc6 Black has to spend another tempo to the pawn, to prevent the white king from protecting it. If 3...h3 then 4.Kd6 h2 5.c7 h1=Q 6.c8=Q, draw. Now the white king has gained enough tempi to get in the square of the black pawn and intercept it.

:4. Kf4 Draw, since the white king can stop the pawn from promoting (e.g. 4...h3 5.Kg3 h2 6.Kxh2).

Another study with the same idea

|tright |Richard Réti, 1928

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |pd| |kd| |pl| | |pd| |pd | | | | | | | |kl | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |White to move and draw Réti used the same idea in another study. The solution is: : 1. Kg6 Kb6 : 2. Kxg7 f5 : 3. Kf6! f4 : 4. Ke5 f3 : 5. Kd6 f2 : 6. c7 f1=Q : 7. c8=Q Qf4+ : **8. Kd5 **

Examples from games

Yates vs. Marshall

|tright |Yates vs. Marshall, 1929

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |pd|kl| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |pl| | | |kd| | | | | | |Black to move In this game between Frederick Yates and Frank Marshall, Black draws using the same idea:

:60... Kb2! If 60...Kc2 61.f4 wins.

:61. Kxa4 If 61.f4 then 61...a3 wins.

:61... Kc3! :62. f4 Kd4 ½–½.

Lasker vs. Tarrasch

|tright |Lasker vs. Tarrasch, 1914

| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |kl| | | | | | | | | |pd|pd|pd| | |kd| | | | | | | | | | | |pl| | | | | | | |pl| | | | | |pl | | | | | | | | |White to move In this 1914 game between World Champion Emanuel Lasker and Siegbert Tarrasch, Black exchanged down into this position because he thought it was a win, but White used the maneuver above to draw the game.

:40. h4 Kg4 41. Kg6! Threatening 42.h5. Black had only considered the line 41.Kf6? c4 42.bxc4 bxc4 43.Ke5 c3 44.bxc3 a4 45.Kd4 a3, winning.

:41... Kxh4 This move is and the white king gains a tempo to return on a different diagonal which is not obstructed by his pawns.

:42. Kf5 Kg3 43. Ke4 Kf2 44. Kd5 Ke3 45. Kxc5 Kd3 46. Kxb5 Kc2 47. Kxa5 Kxb3 ½–½ The theme of this endgame was used later by Réti in the study.

References

Bibliography

  • {{citation
  • {{citation
  • {{citation
  • {{Citation
  • {{Citation
  • {{Citation
  • {{Citation
  • {{Citation

References

  1. {{Harvcol. Müller. Pajeken. 2008
  2. {{Harvcol. Nunn. 2007
  3. {{Harvcol. Dvoretsky. 2006
  4. {{Harvcol. Müller. Lamprecht. 2007
  5. {{Harvcol. Dvoretsky. 2006
  6. {{Harvcol. Müller. Pajeken. 2008
  7. {{Harvcol. de la Villa. 2008
  8. {{Harvcol. Fishbein. 1993
  9. "Yates vs. Marshall".
  10. {{Harvcol. Fishbein. 1993
  11. {{Harvcol. Dvoretsky. 2006
  12. "Lasker vs. Tarrasch".
  13. {{Harvcol. Giddins. 2007
  14. {{Harvcol. Kasparov. 2003
  15. {{Harvcol. Giddins. 2007
  16. {{Harvcol. Kasparov. 2003
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Réti endgame study — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report