Hazen–Williams equation

General form

Henri Pitot discovered that the velocity of a fluid was proportional to the square root of its head in the early 18th century. It takes energy to push a fluid through a pipe, and Antoine de Chézy discovered that the hydraulic head loss was proportional to the velocity squared. Consequently, the Chézy formula relates hydraulic slope S (head loss per unit length) to the fluid velocity V and hydraulic radius R: :V=C\sqrt{RS}=C, R^{0.5}, S^{0.5}

The variable C expresses the proportionality, but the value of C is not a constant. In 1838 and 1839, Gotthilf Hagen and Jean Léonard Marie Poiseuille independently determined a head loss equation for laminar flow, the Hagen–Poiseuille equation. Around 1845, Julius Weisbach and Henry Darcy developed the Darcy–Weisbach equation.

The Darcy-Weisbach equation was difficult to use because the friction factor was difficult to estimate. In 1906, Hazen and Williams provided an empirical formula that was easy to use. The general form of the equation relates the mean velocity of water in a pipe with the geometric properties of the pipe and the slope of the energy line.

:V = k, C, R^{0.63}, S^{0.54}

where:

• V is velocity (in ft/s for US customary units, in m/s for SI units)
• k is a conversion factor for the unit system (k = 1.318 for US customary units, k = 0.849 for SI units)
• C is a roughness coefficient
• R is the hydraulic radius (in ft for US customary units, in m for SI units)
• S is the slope of the energy line (head loss per length of pipe or hf/L)

The equation is similar to the Chézy formula but the exponents have been adjusted to better fit data from typical engineering situations. A result of adjusting the exponents is that the value of C appears more like a constant over a wide range of the other parameters.

The conversion factor k was chosen so that the values for C were the same as in the Chézy formula for the typical hydraulic slope of S=0.001. The value of k is 0.001−0.04.

Typical C factors used in design, which take into account some increase in roughness as pipe ages are as follows:

Pipe equation

The general form can be specialized for full pipe flows. Taking the general form :V = k, C, R^{0.63}, S^{0.54} and exponentiating each side by 1/0.54 gives (rounding exponents to 3–4 decimals) :V^{1.852} = k^{1.852}, C^{1.852}, R^{1.167}, S Rearranging gives :S = {V^{1.852} \over k^{1.852}, C^{1.852}, R^{1.167}} The flow rate , so :S = {V^{1.852} A^{1.852}\over k^{1.852}, C^{1.852}, R^{1.167}, A^{1.852}} = {Q^{1.852}\over k^{1.852}, C^{1.852}, R^{1.167}, A^{1.852}} The hydraulic radius R (which is different from the geometric radius r) for a full pipe of geometric diameter d is d/4; the pipe's cross sectional area A is π d2 / 4, so :S = {4^{1.167}, 4^{1.852},Q^{1.852}\over \pi^{1.852},k^{1.852}, C^{1.852}, d^{1.167}, d^{3.7034}} = {4^{3.019},Q^{1.852}\over \pi^{1.852},k^{1.852}, C^{1.852}, d^{4.8704}} = { 4^{3.019} \over \pi^{1.852},k^{1.852}} {Q^{1.852}\over C^{1.852}, d^{4.8704}} = { 7.8828 \over k^{1.852}} {Q^{1.852}\over C^{1.852}, d^{4.8704}}

U.S. customary units (Imperial)

When used to calculate the pressure drop using the US customary units system, the equation is: :S_{\mathrm{psi\ per\ foot}} = \frac{P_d}{L} = \frac{4.52\ Q^{1.852}}{C^{1.852}\ d^{4.8704}}

where:

• Spsi per foot = frictional resistance (pressure drop per foot of pipe) in psig/ft (pounds per square inch gauge pressure per foot)
• Sfoot of water per foot of pipe
• Pd = pressure drop over the length of pipe in psig (pounds per square inch gauge pressure)
• L = length of pipe in feet
• Q = flow, gpm (gallons per minute)
• C = pipe roughness coefficient
• d = inside pipe diameter, in (inches)

:Note: Caution with U S Customary Units is advised. The equation for head loss in pipes, also referred to as slope, S, expressed in "feet per foot of length" vs. in 'psi per foot of length' as described above, with the inside pipe diameter, d, being entered in feet vs. inches, and the flow rate, Q, being entered in cubic feet per second, cfs, vs. gallons per minute, gpm, appears very similar. However, the constant is 4.73 vs. the 4.52 constant as shown above in the formula as arranged by NFPA for sprinkler system design. The exponents and the Hazen-Williams "C" values are unchanged.

SI units

When used to calculate the head loss with the International System of Units, the equation will then become :

:S = \frac{h_f}{L} = \frac{10.67\ Q^{1.852}}{C^{1.852}\ d^{4.8704}}

where:

• S = hydraulic slope
• hf = head loss in meters (water) over the length of pipe
• L = length of pipe in meters
• Q = volumetric flow rate, m3/s (cubic meters per second)
• C = pipe roughness coefficient
• d = inside pipe diameter, m (meters) :Note: pressure drop can be computed from head loss as hf × the unit weight of water (e.g., 9810 N/m3 at 4 deg C)

References

References

1. "Hazen–Williams Formula".
2. (27 January 2009). "Hazen–Williams equation in fire protection systems". Canute LLP.
3. (1996). "Handbook of Hydraulics". McGraw Hill.
4. (2006). "Pumping station design". Butterworth-Heinemann.
5. Walski, Thomas M.. (March 2006). "A history of water distribution". American Water Works Association.
6. {{Harvnb. Walski. 2006
7. {{Harvnb. Walski. 2006
8. {{Harvnb. Williams. Hazen. 1914
9. {{harvnb. Williams. Hazen. 1914
10. {{harvnb. Williams. Hazen. 1914
11. "Hazen-Williams Coefficients". Engineering ToolBox.
12. 2007 version of NFPA 13: Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, page 13-213, eqn 22.4.2.1
13. "Comparison of Pipe Flow Equations and Head Losses in Fittings".