Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/theorems-in-functional-analysis

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Farrell–Markushevich theorem

Mathematical theorem


Summary

Mathematical theorem

In mathematics, the Farrell–Markushevich theorem, proved independently by O. J. Farrell (1899–1981) and A. I. Markushevich (1908–1979) in 1934, is a result concerning the approximation in mean square of holomorphic functions on a bounded open set in the complex plane by complex polynomials. It states that complex polynomials form a dense subspace of the Bergman space of a domain bounded by a simple closed Jordan curve. The Gram–Schmidt process can be used to construct an orthonormal basis in the Bergman space and hence an explicit form of the Bergman kernel, which in turn yields an explicit Riemann mapping function for the domain.

Proof

Let Ω be the bounded Jordan domain and let Ωn be bounded Jordan domains decreasing to Ω, with Ωn containing the closure of Ωn + 1. By the Riemann mapping theorem there is a conformal mapping f**n of Ωn onto Ω, normalised to fix a given point in Ω with positive derivative there. By the Carathéodory kernel theorem f**n(z) converges uniformly on compacta in Ω to z.See:

In fact Carathéodory's theorem implies that the inverse maps tend uniformly on compacta to z. Given a subsequence of f**n, it has a subsequence, convergent on compacta in Ω. Since the inverse functions converge to z, it follows that the subsequence converges to z on compacta. Hence f**n converges to z on compacta in Ω.

As a consequence the derivative of f**n tends to 1 uniformly on compacta.

Let g be a square integrable holomorphic function on Ω, i.e. an element of the Bergman space A2(Ω). Define g**n on Ωn by g**n(z) = g(f**n(z))f**n'(z). By change of variable

:\displaystyle{|g_n|^2_{\Omega_n} =|g|_\Omega^2.}

Let h**n be the restriction of g**n to Ω. Then the norm of h**n is less than that of g**n. Thus these norms are uniformly bounded. Passing to a subsequence if necessary, it can therefore be assumed that h**n has a weak limit in A2(Ω). On the other hand, h**n tends uniformly on compacta to g. Since the evaluation maps are continuous linear functions on A2(Ω), g is the weak limit of h**n. On the other hand, by Runge's theorem, h**n lies in the closed subspace K of A2(Ω) generated by complex polynomials. Hence g lies in the weak closure of K, which is K itself.

Notes

References

  • {{citation|last=Farrell|first= O. J.|title= On approximation to an analytic function by polynomials|journal= Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. |volume=40|year=1934|issue= 12|pages=908–914|doi=10.1090/s0002-9904-1934-06002-6|doi-access=free}}

References

  1. Bick, Theodore A.. (9 December 2019). ["A History of the Mathematics Department"](https://www.union.edu/mathematics/history-mathematics-department}}; {{cite web).
  2. {{harvnb. Conway. 2000
Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Farrell–Markushevich theorem — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report