Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/periodic-comets

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

54P/de Vico–Swift–NEAT

Periodic comet


Periodic comet

FieldValue
name54P/de Vico–Swift–NEAT
imageComet de Vico-Swift 1965 (US Navy).jpg
caption54P/V–S–N photographed from the US Naval Observatory on 4 August 1965
discovererFrancesco de Vico
Edward D. Swift
NEAT
discovery_siteRome, Italy
discovery_date23 August 1844
mpc_name
designations
orbit_ref
observation_arc130.01 years
obs406
epoch17 October 2024 (JD 2460600.5)
semimajor3.786 AU
perihelion2.171 AU
aphelion5.40 AU
eccentricity0.42635
period7.37 years
inclination6.064°
asc_node358.8°
arg_peri1.986°
mean5.760°
tjup2.908
Earth_moid1.172 AU
Jupiter_moid0.097 AU
physical_ref
mean_diameter≤ 4.2 km
M114.2
M217.2
last_p3 September 2024
next_p2031-Dec-01

Edward D. Swift NEAT

54P/de Vico–Swift–NEAT is a periodic comet in the Solar System first discovered by Father Francesco de Vico (Rome, Italy) on 23 August 1844. It has become a lost comet several times after its discovery. The comet makes numerous close approaches to Jupiter. The comet was last observed on 3 December 2024.

Observational history

First discovery (1844)

Independent discoveries were made by Melhop (Hamburg, Germany) on 6 September and by Hamilton Lanphere Smith (Cleveland, Ohio, USA) on 10 September.

Paul Laugier and Felix Victor Mauvais calculated an orbit on 9 September 1844, and noted that a similarity existed with comets seen in previous years, by including 289P/Blanpain of 1819, into their calculations, they came up with an orbital period of between 4.6 and 4.9 years.

Hervé Faye (Paris, France) computed the first elliptical orbit on 16 September 1844, and the orbital period as 5.46 years.

The comet was considered lost as subsequent predicted returns after 1844 were never observed.

Second discovery (1894)

Edward D. Swift (Echo Mountain, California, USA) rediscovered the comet on 21 November 1894. Adolf Berberich suggested the comet might be the same as de Vico's comet on the basis of the comet's location and direction of motion.

After 1894, the comet was considered lost again after the 1901 and 1907 returns remained unseen, mainly due to perturbations caused by another close approach of Jupiter in 1897.

Third discovery (1965)

In 1963, Brian G. Marsden used a computer to link the 1844 and 1894 sightings and calculated a favourable return in 1965. The comet was subsequently recovered by Arnold Klemola (Yale-Columbia Southern Observatory, Argentina) on 30June 1965, at magnitude 17.

The comet made another close approach to Jupiter in 1968, which increased its perihelion distance and orbital period. As a result, its most favorable apparitions is expected to be no brighter than 18. The comet was not observed for subsequent predictions, by 1995 it was again considered lost.

Fourth discovery (2002)

The Near-Earth Asteroid Tracking (NEAT) program rediscovered the comet on 11 October 2002. The LINEAR program (New Mexico) found several prediscovery images from 4 October. It was confirmed as a return of comet 54P/de Vico–Swift by Kenji Muraoka (Kochi, Japan).

2009 apparition

On 17 August 2009, comet 54P/de Vico–Swift–NEAT was recovered, while it was 2.3 AU from the Sun.

References

| access-date= 15 April 2025 }}

| display-authors= 4

| access-date= 22 February 2012 }}

| doi-access= free }}

| doi-access= free }}

| access-date= 15 April 2025 }}

| access-date= 21 September 2009 }}

| doi-access= free }}

Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about 54P/de Vico–Swift–NEAT — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report