Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/cev-champions-league

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

2012–13 CEV Champions League


FieldValue
title2012–13 CEV Champions League
leagueCEV Champions League
sportVolleyball
duration22 October 2012 – 18 March 2013
no_of_teams28
finalsFinals
finals_venueRUS Omsk
finals_champRUS Lokomotiv Novosibirsk
finals_MVPSWE Marcus Nilsson
seasonslistnamesCEV Champions League
prevseason_link2011–12 CEV Champions League
prevseason_year2011–12
nextseason_link2013–14 CEV Champions League
nextseason_year2013–14

The 2012–13 CEV Champions League was the 54th edition of the highest level European volleyball club competition organised by the European Volleyball Confederation.

Participating teams

RankCountryNumber of teamsTeams
13Diatec Trentino
Bre Banca Lannutti Cuneo
Lube Banca Marche Macerata
23Zenit Kazan
Lokomotiv Novosibirsk
Dynamo Moscow
33PGE Skra Bełchatów
ZAKSA Kędzierzyn-Koźle
Asseco Resovia
43Euphony Asse-Lennik
Noliko Maaseik
Knack Roeselare
52Fenerbahçe Grundig İstanbul
Arkas İzmir
62Tours VB
Arago de Sète
73VfB Friedrichshafen
Generali Unterhaching
Berlin Recycling Volleys
81Hypo Tirol Innsbruck
91CAI Teruel
101ACH Volley Ljubljana
111Crvena Zvezda Beograd
122Remat Zalău
Tomis Constanța
131Jihostroj České Budějovice
141Budvanska Rivijera Budva
151Marek Union-Ivkoni Dupnitsa

League round

28 teams were drawn to 7 pools of 4 teams each.

The 1st + the best 5 ranked with the best score qualified for the Playoff 12

The organizer of the Final Four were determined after the end of the League Round and qualified directly for the Final Four.

The team of the organizer of the Final Four was replaced by the next 2nd ranked team with the best score.

The remaining second-placed teams as well 3 third ranked teams with the best score moved to the Challenge Round of the CEV Cup

The remaining 3rd placed and all 4th placed teams were eliminated.

  • All times are local.

Pool A

Pool B

Pool C

Pool D

Pool E

Pool F

Pool G

Playoffs

GroupWinnersSecond placeABCDEFG
RUS Zenit Kazan
RUS Lokomotiv Novosibirsk (F4 Hosts)GER Berlin Recycling Volleys
ITA Diatec TrentinoPOL ZAKSA Kędzierzyn-Koźle
ITA Lube Banca Marche MacerataSLO ACH Volley Ljubljana
POL PGE Skra BełchatówRUS Dynamo Moscow
BEL Noliko MaaseikTUR Arkas İzmir
ITA Bre Banca Lannutti CuneoPOL Asseco Resovia

Playoff 12

First leg

Second leg

Playoff 6

First leg

Second leg

Final Four

  • Organizer: RUS Lokomotiv Novosibirsk
  • Place: Omsk
  • All times are Omsk Time (UTC+07:00).

|team-width=240 |16 March|ITA Bre Banca Lannutti Cuneo|3|POL ZAKSA Kędzierzyn-Koźle|2 |16 March|RUS Zenit Kazan|2|RUS Lokomotiv Novosibirsk|3 |17 March|ITA Bre Banca Lannutti Cuneo|2|RUS Lokomotiv Novosibirsk|3 |17 March|POL ZAKSA Kędzierzyn-Koźle|1|RUS Zenit Kazan|3

Semifinals

3rd place match

Final

Final standings

RankTeam
RUS Lokomotiv Novosibirsk
ITA Bre Banca Lannutti Cuneo
RUS Zenit Kazan
4POL ZAKSA Kędzierzyn-Koźle

Awards

  • Most valuable player
  • : SWE Marcus Nilsson (Lokomotiv Novosibirsk)
  • Best scorer
  • : SWE Marcus Nilsson (Lokomotiv Novosibirsk)
  • Best spiker
  • : FRA Antonin Rouzier (ZAKSA Kędzierzyn-Koźle)
  • Best server
  • : BRA Luiz Felipe Fonteles (ZAKSA Kędzierzyn-Koźle)
  • Best blocker
  • : USA David Lee (Zenit Kazan)
  • Best receiver
  • : RUS Yury Berezhko (Zenit Kazan)
  • Best libero
  • : ITA Daniele De Pandis (Bre Banca Lannutti Cuneo)
  • Best setter
  • : RUS Aleksandr Butko (Lokomotiv Novosibirsk)
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about 2012–13 CEV Champions League — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report