From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
2011 Levene Gouldin & Thompson Tennis Challenger – Doubles
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| champ | |
| runner | |
| score | 6–4, 6–3 |
| type | singles doubles |
Main article: 2011 Levene Gouldin & Thompson Tennis Challenger
Treat Conrad Huey and Dominic Inglot were the defending champions, but Inglot decided not to participate. Huey partnered up with Frederik Nielsen.
Juan Sebastián Cabal and Robert Farah won this tournament. They defeated Treat Conrad Huey and Frederik Nielsen 6–4, 6–3 in the final.
Seeds
- COL Juan Sebastián Cabal / COL Robert Farah (champions)
- PHI Treat Conrad Huey / DEN Frederik Nielsen (final)
- AUS Jordan Kerr / USA David Martin (semifinals)
- AUS Carsten Ball / AUS Chris Guccione (semifinals)
Draw
Draw
| RD1-seed01=1 | RD1-team01=**** | RD1-score01-1=6 | RD1-score01-2=6 | RD1-score01-3= | RD1-seed02= | RD1-team02= | RD1-score02-1=0 | RD1-score02-2=3 | RD1-score02-3=
| RD1-seed03= | RD1-team03=**** | RD1-score03-1=6 | RD1-score03-2=6 | RD1-score03-3= | RD1-seed04=WC | RD1-team04=USA William Mendler USA Alex Tsai | RD1-score04-1=2 | RD1-score04-2=3 | RD1-score04-3=
| RD1-seed05=3 | RD1-team05=**** | RD1-score05-1=6 | RD1-score05-2=6 | RD1-score05-3= | RD1-seed06=WC | RD1-team06= | RD1-score06-1=2 | RD1-score06-2=1 | RD1-score06-3=
| RD1-seed07= | RD1-team07=**** | RD1-score07-1=6 | RD1-score07-2=6 | RD1-score07-3= | RD1-seed08=Alt | RD1-team08=USA Ronald McKenzie USA John Valenti | RD1-score08-1=1 | RD1-score08-2=0 | RD1-score08-3=
| RD1-seed09= | RD1-team09=**** | RD1-score09-1=6 | RD1-score09-2=6 | RD1-score09-3= | RD1-seed10=Alt | RD1-team10=USA Krasimir Kolev BLR Tsimafey Senkevich | RD1-score10-1=0 | RD1-score10-2=3 | RD1-score10-3=
| RD1-seed11= | RD1-team11= | RD1-score11-1=65 | RD1-score11-2=2 | RD1-score11-3= | RD1-seed12=4 | RD1-team12=**** | RD1-score12-1=77 | RD1-score12-2=6 | RD1-score12-3=
| RD1-seed13= | RD1-team13=**** | RD1-score13-1=77 | RD1-score13-2=1 | RD1-score13-3=[12] | RD1-seed14= | RD1-team14= | RD1-score14-1=62 | RD1-score14-2=6 | RD1-score14-3=[10]
| RD1-seed15= | RD1-team15= | RD1-score15-1=4 | RD1-score15-2=4 | RD1-score15-3= | RD1-seed16=2 | RD1-team16=**** | RD1-score16-1=6 | RD1-score16-2=6 | RD1-score16-3=
| RD2-seed01=1 | RD2-team01=**** | RD2-score01-1=6 | RD2-score01-2=1 | RD2-score01-3=[10] | RD2-seed02= | RD2-team02= | RD2-score02-1=2 | RD2-score02-2=6 | RD2-score02-3=[8]
| RD2-seed03=3 | RD2-team03=**** | RD2-score03-1=7 | RD2-score03-2=6 | RD2-score03-3= | RD2-seed04= | RD2-team04= | RD2-score04-1=5 | RD2-score04-2=3 | RD2-score04-3=
| RD2-seed05= | RD2-team05= | RD2-score05-1=3 | RD2-score05-2=2 | RD2-score05-3= | RD2-seed06=4 | RD2-team06=**** | RD2-score06-1=6 | RD2-score06-2=6 | RD2-score06-3=
| RD2-seed07= | RD2-team07= | RD2-score07-1=2 | RD2-score07-2=1 | RD2-score07-3= | RD2-seed08=2 | RD2-team08=**** | RD2-score08-1=6 | RD2-score08-2=6 | RD2-score08-3=
| RD3-seed01=1 | RD3-team01=**** | RD3-score01-1=1 | RD3-score01-2=6 | RD3-score01-3=[10] | RD3-seed02=3 | RD3-team02= | RD3-score02-1=6 | RD3-score02-2=4 | RD3-score02-3=[6]
| RD3-seed03=4 | RD3-team03= | RD3-score03-1=4 | RD3-score03-2=77 | RD3-score03-3=[7] | RD3-seed04=2 | RD3-team04=**** | RD3-score04-1=6 | RD3-score04-2=64 | RD3-score04-3=[10]
| RD4-seed01=1 | RD4-team01=**** | RD4-score01-1=6 | RD4-score01-2=6 | RD4-score01-3= | RD4-seed02=2 | RD4-team02= | RD4-score02-1=4 | RD4-score02-2=3 | RD4-score02-3=
References
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 2011 Levene Gouldin & Thompson Tennis Challenger – Doubles — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report