Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
sports

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

2010 Levene Gouldin & Thompson Tennis Challenger – Doubles


FieldValue
champ
runner
score5–7, 7–6(2), [10–8]
typesingles doubles

Main article: 2010 Levene Gouldin & Thompson Tennis Challenger

Rik de Voest and Scott Lipsky were the defending champions, but de Voest chose to not participate this year.

Lipsky partnered with David Martin, but they lost to Treat Conrad Huey and Dominic Inglot in the final 5–7, 7–6(2), [10–8].

Seeds

  1. GBR Colin Fleming / GBR Ken Skupski (semifinals)
  2. AUS Carsten Ball / AUS Chris Guccione (semifinals, withdrew)
  3. USA Scott Lipsky / USA David Martin (final)
  4. AUS Adam Hubble / IND Harsh Mankad (quarterfinals)

Draw

Draw

| RD1-seed01=1 | RD1-team01=**** | RD1-score01-1=2 | RD1-score01-2=6 | RD1-score01-3=[10] | RD1-seed02= | RD1-team02= | RD1-score02-1=6 | RD1-score02-2=3 | RD1-score02-3=[4]

| RD1-seed03= | RD1-team03=**** | RD1-score03-1=6 | RD1-score03-2=6 | RD1-score03-3= | RD1-seed04=WC | RD1-team04= | RD1-score04-1=2 | RD1-score04-2=3 | RD1-score04-3=

| RD1-seed05=4 | RD1-team05=**** | RD1-score05-1=4 | RD1-score05-2=6 | RD1-score05-3=[10] | RD1-seed06= | RD1-team06= | RD1-score06-1=6 | RD1-score06-2=3 | RD1-score06-3=[7]

| RD1-seed07= | RD1-team07=**** | RD1-score07-1=6 | RD1-score07-2=4 | RD1-score07-3=[10] | RD1-seed08= | RD1-team08= | RD1-score08-1=3 | RD1-score08-2=6 | RD1-score08-3=[3]

| RD1-seed09=WC | RD1-team09=**** | RD1-score09-1= | RD1-score09-2= | RD1-score09-3= | RD1-seed10= | RD1-team10= | RD1-score10-1=w/o | RD1-score10-2= | RD1-score10-3=

| RD1-seed11= | RD1-team11= | RD1-score11-1=2 | RD1-score11-2=4 | RD1-score11-3= | RD1-seed12=3 | RD1-team12=**** | RD1-score12-1=6 | RD1-score12-2=6 | RD1-score12-3=

| RD1-seed13=WC | RD1-team13= | RD1-score13-1=4 | RD1-score13-2=63 | RD1-score13-3= | RD1-seed14= | RD1-team14=**** | RD1-score14-1=6 | RD1-score14-2=7 | RD1-score14-3=

| RD1-seed15=Q | RD1-team15= | RD1-score15-1=1 | RD1-score15-2=5 | RD1-score15-3= | RD1-seed16=2 | RD1-team16=**** | RD1-score16-1=6 | RD1-score16-2=7 | RD1-score16-3=

| RD2-seed01=1 | RD2-team01=**** | RD2-score01-1=66 | RD2-score01-2=6 | RD2-score01-3=[11] | RD2-seed02= | RD2-team02= | RD2-score02-1=7 | RD2-score02-2=4 | RD2-score02-3=[9]

| RD2-seed03=4 | RD2-team03= | RD2-score03-1=4 | RD2-score03-2=66 | RD2-score03-3= | RD2-seed04= | RD2-team04=**** | RD2-score04-1=6 | RD2-score04-2=7 | RD2-score04-3=

| RD2-seed05=WC | RD2-team05= | RD2-score05-1=4 | RD2-score05-2=6 | RD2-score05-3=[6] | RD2-seed06=3 | RD2-team06=**** | RD2-score06-1=6 | RD2-score06-2=3 | RD2-score06-3=[10]

| RD2-seed07= | RD2-team07= | RD2-score07-1=7 | RD2-score07-2=4 | RD2-score07-3=[6] | RD2-seed08=2 | RD2-team08=**** | RD2-score08-1=67 | RD2-score08-2=6 | RD2-score08-3=[10]

| RD3-seed01=1 | RD3-team01= | RD3-score01-1=64 | RD3-score01-2=65 | RD3-score01-3= | RD3-seed02= | RD3-team02=**** | RD3-score02-1=7 | RD3-score02-2=7 | RD3-score02-3=

| RD3-seed03=3 | RD3-team03=**** | RD3-score03-1= | RD3-score03-2= | RD3-score03-3= | RD3-seed04=2 | RD3-team04= | RD3-score04-1=w/o | RD3-score04-2= | RD3-score04-3=

| RD4-seed01= | RD4-team01=**** | RD4-score01-1=5 | RD4-score01-2=7 | RD4-score01-3=[10] | RD4-seed02=3 | RD4-team02= | RD4-score02-1=7 | RD4-score02-2=62 | RD4-score02-3=[8]

References

Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about 2010 Levene Gouldin & Thompson Tennis Challenger – Doubles — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report