From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
1991 North Bedfordshire Borough Council election
The 1991 North Bedfordshire Borough Council election took place on 2 May 1991 to elect members of North Bedfordshire Borough Council in England. This was on the same day as other local elections.
The 1991 North Bedfordshire Borough Council election took place on 2 May 1991 to elect members of North Bedfordshire Borough Council in England. This was on the same day as other local elections .
Prior to the election, two councillors quit the Conservative group to sit as Independents.
1991 North Bedfordshire Borough Council election
Conservative 10 1 58.8 11 21 40.4 15,241 42.9 +6.3
Labour 4 1 23.5 11 15 28.8 11,250 31.7 –6.4
Liberal Democrats 3 17.6 10 13 25.0 9,046 25.5 +1.5
Independent 0 0.0 3 3 5.8 N/A N/A –0.2
Party Candidate Votes % .mw-parser-output .tooltip-dotted{border-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help}±%
Liberal Democrats 1,606 49.8 +11.8
Conservative 1,383 42.9 −7.9
Labour 236 7.3 –3.9
223 6.9
3,225 54.4
5,926
Liberal Democrats gain from Conservative
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Conservative 1,398 75.3 +5.2
Liberal Democrats 256 13.8 −9.9
Labour 202 10.9 +4.6
1,142 61.5
1,856 48.6
3,821
Conservative hold
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Conservative 997 42.7 −7.5
Labour 791 33.9 –0.8
Liberal Democrats 546 23.4 +8.2
206 8.8
2,334 53.1
4,394
Conservative hold
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Labour 1,366 68.5 +14.7
Conservative 331 16.6 −17.6
Liberal Democrats 296 14.9 +4.4
1,035 51.9
1,993 36.2
5,505
Labour hold
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Conservative 604 50.6 +6.3
Labour 343 28.7 +13.2
Liberal Democrats 247 20.7 –19.4
261 21.9
1,194 41.6
2,868
Conservative hold
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Conservative 1,286 44.9 −4.3
Liberal Democrats 1,278 44.6 +5.1
Labour 300 10.5 –0.8
8 0.3
2,864 51.5
5,566
Conservative hold
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Liberal Democrats 1,153 46.2 +1.7
Labour 933 37.4 +8.1
Conservative 411 16.5 –9.7
220 8.8
2,497 47.1
5,304
Liberal Democrats hold
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Conservative 576 62.2 –14.6
Liberal Democrats 350 37.8 +29.9
226 24.4
926 47.5
1,951
Conservative hold
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Labour 1,244 54.8 +12.2
Conservative 815 35.9 −13.6
Liberal Democrats 212 9.3 +1.3
429 18.9
2,271 40.5
5,608
Labour gain from Conservative
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Conservative 1,412 45.1 −9.3
Labour 1,409 45.0 +11.6
Liberal Democrats 313 10.0 −2.2
3 0.1
3,134 43.8
7,163
Conservative hold
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Conservative 677 65.4 –6.2
Liberal Democrats 358 34.6 +19.8
319 30.8
1,035 50.1
2,067
Conservative hold
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Conservative 1,199 47.9 −7.8
Labour 1,072 42.8 +9.8
Liberal Democrats 234 9.3 −2.0
127 5.1
2,505 40.6
6,173
Conservative hold
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Labour 1,133 58.1 +21.3
Conservative 569 29.2 +9.9
Liberal Democrats 249 12.8 −31.1
564 28.9
1,951 36.9
5,294
Labour gain from Liberal Democrats
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Liberal Democrats 1,265 47.1 +6.8
Conservative 1,246 46.4 −5.5
Labour 176 6.6 –1.2
19 0.7
2,687 48.6
5,532
Liberal Democrats gain from Conservative
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Labour 1,264 54.9 –8.3
Conservative 711 30.9 +4.7
Liberal Democrats 329 14.3 +3.7
553 24.0
2,304 43.0
5,356
Labour hold
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Conservative 646 64.2 –1.2
Labour 206 20.5 +10.6
Liberal Democrats 155 15.4 –9.3
440 43.7
1,007 50.0
2,013
Conservative hold
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Conservative 980 55.9 +10.6
Labour 575 32.8 –8.5
Liberal Democrats 199 11.3 +3.3
405 23.1
1,754 48.3
3,629
Conservative hold
Want to explore this topic further?
Ask Mako anything about 1991 North Bedfordshire Borough Council election — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with Mako
Free with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up free
Content sourced from
Wikipedia , available under
CC BY-SA 4.0 .
This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report