From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
1961–62 Yugoslav Second League
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| competition | Yugoslav Second League |
| season | 1961–62 |
| winners | Željezničar Sarajevo (West Division) |
| Budućnost (East Division) | |
| promoted | Željezničar Sarajevo |
| Sloboda | |
| Budućnost | |
| Radnički Niš | |
| relegated | Radnički Sombor |
| prevseason | 1960–61 |
| nextseason | 1962–63 |
Budućnost (East Division) Sloboda Budućnost Radnički Niš
The 1961–62 Yugoslav Second League season was the 16th season of the Second Federal League (), the second level association football competition of SFR Yugoslavia, since its establishment in 1946. The league was contested in two regional groups (West Division and East Division), with 12 clubs each.
West Division
Teams
A total of twelve teams contested the league, including nine sides from the 1960–61 season, one club relegated from the 1960–61 Yugoslav First League and two sides promoted from the third tier leagues played in the 1960–61 season. The league was contested in a double round robin format, with each club playing every other club twice, for a total of 22 rounds. Two points were awarded for wins and one point for draws.
RNK Split were relegated from the 1960–61 Yugoslav First League after finishing in the 11th place of the league table. The two clubs promoted to the second level were Borovo and Maribor.
| Team | Location | Federal subject | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| in 1960–61 | |||
| Borovo | Borovo Naselje | SR Croatia | |
| Čelik | Zenica | SR Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0044th |
| Karlovac | Karlovac | SR Croatia | 01010th |
| Lokomotiva | Zagreb | SR Croatia | 0077th |
| Maribor | Maribor | SR Slovenia | |
| Proleter Osijek | Osijek | SR Croatia | 0099th |
| Sloboda | Tuzla | SR Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0055th |
| RNK Split | Split | SR Croatia | |
| Šibenik | Šibenik | SR Croatia | 0088th |
| Trešnjevka | Zagreb | SR Croatia | 0033rd |
| Varteks | Varaždin | SR Croatia | 0066th |
| Željezničar Sarajevo | Sarajevo | SR Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0022nd |
League table
East Division
Teams
A total of twelve teams contested the league, including nine sides from the 1960–61 season, one club relegated from the 1960–61 Yugoslav First League and two sides promoted from the third tier leagues played in the 1960–61 season. The league was contested in a double round robin format, with each club playing every other club twice, for a total of 22 rounds. Two points were awarded for wins and one point for draws.
Radnički Belgrade were relegated from the 1960–61 Yugoslav First League after finishing in the 12th place of the league table. The two clubs promoted to the second level were Prishtina and Proleter Zrenjanin.
| Team | Location | Federal subject | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| in 1960–61 | |||
| Budućnost | Titograd | SR Montenegro | 0022nd |
| Mačva Šabac | Šabac | SR Serbia | 01010th |
| Prishtina | Pristina | SR Serbia SAP Kosovo | |
| Proleter Zrenjanin | Zrenjanin | SR Serbia SAP Vojvodina | |
| Radnički Belgrade | Belgrade | SR Serbia | |
| Radnički Kragujevac | Kragujevac | SR Serbia | 0088th |
| Radnički Niš | Niš | SR Serbia | 0055th |
| Radnički Sombor | Sombor | SR Serbia SAP Vojvodina | 0033rd |
| Rudar | Kosovska Mitrovica | SR Serbia SAP Kosovo | 0099th |
| Spartak Subotica | Subotica | SR Serbia SAP Vojvodina | 0066th |
| Srem | Sremska Mitrovica | SR Serbia SAP Vojvodina | 0044th |
| Sutjeska | Nikšić | SR Montenegro | 0077th |
League table
and Qualification for Balkans Cup
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 1961–62 Yugoslav Second League — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report